洪敬謨의 「山居十供記」와 19세기 淸供의 문화적 함의
Hong Gyeong-mo’s SanGeoShipGongGi (山居十供記) and the Cultural Implications of CheongGong (淸供) in the Nineteenth Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the cultural implications of CheongGong (淸供, pure offerings) in the nineteenth century focusing on the SanGeoShipGongGi by Hong Gyeong-mo (洪敬謨, 1774~1851). Born in GyoungHwaSeJok (京華世族, a noble family of Seoul), Hong Gyeong-mo was describing elegant lifestyle with ten types of CheongGong in his cottage of Uidong indicating the literati's lifestyle and leading motives of an aesthetic taste in those days. In a sense, it is called CheongGong life. CheongGong came from a name for the offerings in all the traditional rituals and memorial services, and the notion was originated from a religious ritual offerings including Buddhism. CheongGong had expanded its notion the same as CheongWan (淸玩, pure appreciation) representing entire pattern of the literati’s WanSang (玩賞, appreciation) in the late Ming period, which affected to change the lifestyle of Joseon literati as well. CheongGong discussed in this paper is symbolized as an important keyword which explicates the formation and development of new aesthetic consciousness crossing over the border of WanMulSangJi (玩物喪志, Once one begins to be indulged in things, he may lose his mind) and opening a new door to the culture of WanMul (玩物, appreciation of objects) in Joseon’s Neo-Confucian perspectives. It means that the CheongGong life has been symbolized as CheongSa (淸事, pure activity) implying the spiritual cultivation for pure mind of the literati. In the notion of CheongGong by Hong Gyeong-mo, the serenity in mind enjoying the life of CheongWan is also interpreted as the state of purity reflecting one’s aesthetic consciousness, and all the appreciation objects belong to a method of Self-discipline. Hong Gyeong-mo’s view on CheongGong is interpreted that it keeps a clear ideological distance and distinction from WanMul and its vulgarity, which signifies CheongWan life as a non-vulgarity placing a special value on purity as well as implies free of vulgarity. Hong Gyeong-mo’s case well describing the ideological aura surrounding CheongGong could be seen as a concrete evidence explaining ideological mechanism that enabled the hierarchical taste of the literati in Joseon who enjoyed the indulgence in WanMul through a series of ideology process under purity. However, the hierarchical taste that the literati class aimed ultimately had spread to the vulgarized and popularized culture, which implies the ambivalent characteristics of culture in the sense of vulgarity out of non-vulgarity.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the cultural implications of CheongGong (淸供, pure offerings) in the nineteenth century focusing on the SanGeoShipGongGi by Hong Gyeong-mo (洪敬謨, 1774~1851). Born in GyoungHwaSeJok (京華世族, a noble family of Seoul), Hong Gyeong-mo was describing elegant lifestyle with ten types of CheongGong in his cottage of Uidong indicating the literati's lifestyle and leading motives of an aesthetic taste in those days. In a sense, it is called CheongGong life. CheongGong came from a name for the offerings in all the traditional rituals and memorial services, and the notion was originated from a religious ritual offerings including Buddhism. CheongGong had expanded its notion the same as CheongWan (淸玩, pure appreciation) representing entire pattern of the literati’s WanSang (玩賞, appreciation) in the late Ming period, which affected to change the lifestyle of Joseon literati as well. CheongGong discussed in this paper is symbolized as an important keyword which explicates the formation and development of new aesthetic consciousness crossing over the border of WanMulSangJi (玩物喪志, Once one begins to be indulged in things, he may lose his mind) and opening a new door to the culture of WanMul (玩物, appreciation of objects) in Joseon’s Neo-Confucian perspectives. It means that the CheongGong life has been symbolized as CheongSa (淸事, pure activity) implying the spiritual cultivation for pure mind of the literati. In the notion of CheongGong by Hong Gyeong-mo, the serenity in mind enjoying the life of CheongWan is also interpreted as the state of purity reflecting one’s aesthetic consciousness, and all the appreciation objects belong to a method of Self-discipline. Hong Gyeong-mo’s view on CheongGong is interpreted that it keeps a clear ideological distance and distinction from WanMul and its vulgarity, which signifies CheongWan life as a non-vulgarity placing a special value on purity as well as implies free of vulgarity. Hong Gyeong-mo’s case well describing the ideological aura surrounding CheongGong could be seen as a concrete evidence explaining ideological mechanism that enabled the hierarchical taste of the literati in Joseon who enjoyed the indulgence in WanMul through a series of ideology process under purity. However, the hierarchical taste that the literati class aimed ultimately had spread to the vulgarized and popularized culture, which implies the ambivalent characteristics of culture in the sense of vulgarity out of non-vulgarity.
참고문헌 (64)
- "漢語大詞典", ~
- 王娜, "浅论中国传统哲学与中国古代揷花艺术的发展", 西北林学院学报, 21(3), pp.159~160 (2006), 西北农林科技大学 人文学院
- "南史", ~
- 박심은, "조선시대 책가도의 기원 연구", 석사, 미술, pp.2002
- 黃永川, "中國古代揷花藝術", pp.56~ (1984), 中華民國國立歷史博物館
- 허보인, "韓國의 器皿折枝圖 연구", 석사, pp.1998
- 袁宏道, "甁史", ~
- 高濂, "遵生八牋 卷8, 起居安樂牋 下", ~
- 赵丽红, "淸代御用文房淸供", 文物天地, 190 (2007), 杂志社
- 손정희, "19세기 博物學的 趣向과 繪畵의 새로운 경향", 한국문화, (44), pp.49~73 (2008), 규장각한국학연구원
- 李穡, "牧隱詩藁 第35卷", ~
- 한영우, "19세기 전반 홍경모의 역사서술", 한국문화, 11 (1990), 규장각한국학연구소
- 강석화, "19세기 京華士族 洪敬謨의 생애와 사상", 한국사연구, 112 (2001), 한국사연구회
- 신영주, "18, 19세기 홍양호家의 예술 향유와 서예 비평", 민족문학사연구, 18 (2001), 민족문학사학회
- 이군선, "관암 홍경모의 중국문인과의 교류와 그 의의 -1차 연행을 중심으로-", 동방한문학, 23 (2002), 동방한문학회
- 이군선, "관암 홍경모의 시문과 그 성격", 박사, 한국한문학, pp.2003
- 이군선, "李溪家와 牛耳洞", 한국한문학연구, (33), pp.179~203 (2004), 한국한문학회
- 이군선, "관암 홍경모의 가문의식", 동아시아문화연구, 39 (2005), 한양대학교 동아시아문화연구소
- 李君善, "冠巖 洪敬謨의 中國文人과의 交遊와 그 意義", 동방한문학, 23, pp.251~272 (2002), 동방한문학회
- 이종묵, "조선후기 경화세족의 주거문화와 四宜堂", 漢文學報, 19, pp.567~592 (2008), 우리한문학회
- 이종묵, "사의당지, 우리 집을 말한다" (2009), 휴머니스트
- 장유승, "홍경모의 생애와 저술 :冠巖全書를 중심으로", 문헌과해석, 52 (2010), 문헌과 해석사
- 김문식, "홍경모가 기록한 정조의 화성행차", 문헌과해석, 52 (2010), 문헌과 해석사
- 이종묵, "관암 홍경모와 19세기 학술사" (2011), 경인문화사
- 洪敬謨, "山居十供記, In 冠巖全書 冊15", pp.443~444
- 이종묵, "홍경모 집안의 우이동 별서, In 관암 홍경모와 19세기 학술사", pp.103~161
- 洪善杓, "朝鮮後期의 繪畵 愛好風潮와 鑑評活動", 美術史論壇, (5) (1997), 한국미술연구소
- 박효은, "조선후기 문인들의 회화수집활동 연구", 석사, 회화사, pp.1999
- 강명관, "조선시대 문학예술의 생성공간" (1999), 소명출판
- 정민, "18세기 조선지식인의 발견" (2007), 휴머니스트
- 장진성, "조선후기 고동서화(古董書畵) 수집열기의 성격 : 김홍도의 <포의풍류도>와 <사인초상>에 대한 검토", 미술사와 시각문화, 3 (2004), 사회평론
- 장진성, "조선후기 士人風俗畵와 餘暇文化", 美術史論壇, (24), pp.261~291 (2007), 한국미술연구소
- 안대회, "조선 후기 취미생활과 문화현상", 한국문화, (60), pp.65~96 (2012), 규장각한국학연구원
- 李夏坤, "題一源爛芳焦光帖, In 頭陀草 冊18"
- 洪良浩, "芸窩集跋, In 耳溪集 卷16"
- 洪重聖, "哀辭, In 芸窩集 卷6"
- 南公轍, "李尙書東園雅集圖記, In 金陵集 卷12"
- 丁範祖, "畫帖序, In 海左先生文集 卷22"
- 강관식, "조선후기 궁중화원 연구 상" (2001), 돌베개
- 張混, "平生志, In 而已广集 卷14"
- 강혜선, "장혼이 인왕산에 그린 집, 이이엄", 문헌과해석, 30, pp.40~51 (2005)
- 李德懋, "耳目口心書 2, In 靑莊館全書 卷 49"
- 김울림, "翁方綱의 金石考證學과 東蘇坡像", 미술사논단, 18 (2004), 한국미술연구소
- 김현권, "추사 김정희가 수용한 翁方綱소장 蘇軾 진영", 도시역사문화, 4 (2006), 서울역사박물관
- 신지원, "당호를 통해서 본 19세기초 소동파 관련 서화 소장 문화와 대청 문화 교류", 한국문화, (45), pp.75~96 (2009), 규장각한국학연구원
- 申緯, "鳴琴采藥之軒存藁, In 警修堂全藁 冊2"
- 申緯, "花徑賸墨 6, In 警修堂全藁 冊10"
- 金正喜, "答趙怡堂冕鎬, In 阮堂集 卷1"
- "阮堂集 卷5, 與草衣 2", ~
- 金正喜, "山寺, In 阮堂集 卷9"
- "阮堂集 卷10", ~
- 徐居正, "四佳詩集"
- 李廷龜, "月沙集 卷34"
- 張維, "谿谷集 卷31"
- 成海應, "皛堂記, In 硏經齋全集續集 册17"
- 朴思浩, "留館雜錄, In 心田稿 2"
- 徐有榘, "自然經室記, In 金華知非集 卷第5"
- 姜寬植, "朝鮮後期 宮中 冊架圖 : 조선후기 ‘民畵’ 개념의 새로운 이해를 위한 小考", 美術資料, (66), pp.79~95 (2001), 국립중앙박물관
- 방병선, "이형록의 책가문방도 팔곡병에 나타난 중국도자", 강좌미술사, (28), pp.209~238 (2007), 한국불교미술사학회
- 신영주, "18·9세기 홍양호가의 예술 향유와 서예 비평", 석사, 한문학, pp.2001
- 황정연, "조선시대 서화수장 연구", 박사, 미술사학, pp.2007
- 이완우, "홍경모의 금석서예 題跋, In 관암 홍경모와 19세기 학술사", pp.371~447 (2011)
- 손정희, "17세기 조선의 관물론에 나타난 완물과 천기 개념의 연구", 석사, 미학과, pp.2012
- 이종묵, "조선의 문화공간 4", pp.214~215 (2006), 휴머니스트