본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

형태소 개념과 국어사 기술

The Concept of the Morpheme and the Description on the History of the Korean Language

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Abstract

The Concept of the Morpheme and the Description on the History of the Korean Language Morphs which are allomorphs of a morpheme have a complementary distribution or an exclusive distribution. It is known that the terms of a complementary distribution or a exclusive distribution have the same meaning in synchroninic linguistics. But the meaning of the two terms are not equal conceptually. Exactly a complementary distribution refers to the follows; in units consisting of more than one alternant, the total distribution of all the alternants equals the range of environments in which some unit with only a single alternant occurs. And an exclusive distribution refers to the follows; no one of two or more alternants ever occurs in the same environment as the other. When all the alternants are in a stable state synchronically, it is said that a complementary distribution and an exclusive distribution have the same meaning because they have the same denotation. However when all the alternants are in the process of historical change, a complementary distribution and an exclusive distribution must be distinguished respectively. For example, the postposition of nominative case '이' and '가' is in a complementary distribution and an exclusive distribution at the same time in modern Korean. But while the new form '가' emerged and encroached on the territory of the old form '이', the two forms '이' and '가' was in a complementary distribution but not in an exclusive distribution diachronically. The notion that a complementary distribution are different from an exclusive distribution diachronically can explain many other phenomena of the history of Korean language such as ' ' and '는', '-았-' and '-었-', '니르-' and '니를-', etc.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 고영근, "국어형태론연구", 1989 (1978), ~[DOI]
  2. 구본관, "의미와 통사범주를 바꾸지 않는 접미사류에 대하여", 29 (1997)
  3. 김성규, "어휘소 설정과 음운현상 국어연구" (1987)
  4. 김영욱, "중세국어 원칙법 '-니-'와 둘째설명법 어미 '-니라'의 설정에 따른 문제점 해결을 위하여 관악어문연구" (1989)
  5. 김영욱, "문법형태의 역사적 연구" (1995), 박이정
  6. 김영욱, "공형태소에 대하여", 9 (1997)
  7. 송기중, "현대국어 한자어의 구조", 1 (1992), 한국정신문화연구원
  8. 송철의, "언어 변화와 언어의 화석 국어사 자료와 국어학의 연구" (1993)
  9. 양정호, "중세국어의 기에 대하여" (2004)
  10. 이승재, "융합형의 형태분석과 형태의 화석" (1992)
  11. 이승재, "동명사 어미의 역사적 변화" (1995), 태학사
  12. 이현희, "중세국어 '둔겁-'의 형태론" (1987)
  13. 장윤희, "공형태 분석의 타당성 검토", 1-2 (1999)
  14. Aronoff, "Word Formation in Generative Grammar" (1976), MIT Press
  15. Crystal, "A First Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics" (1980)
  16. Harris, "Morpheme Alternants in Linguistic Analysis", pp.~18 (1942)
  17. Hockett, "Problem of Morphemic Analysis", pp.~23 (1947)
  18. Nida, "the Discriptive Analysis of Word" (1949), Univ of Michigan Press
  19. Nida, "the Discriptive Analysis of Word" (1949), Univ of Michigan Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)