開化啓蒙時代 ‘演說’과 ‘講演’의 分化와 非政治的 公論場 形成의 背景
A Study on Specialization of Yeonseol(演說, Speech) and Gangyeon(講演, Lecture) and Background of formation of Non-politic public opinion field in the time of Enlightenment
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This Study focuses on determining that the translated term of “speech”, Yeonseol (演說) had the distinct tendency to violate against the politic fundamental that has been laid the foundation of the loyal road politics throughout the Joseon Dynasty,with the homophones in Korean, Yeonseol(筵說) has represented the relations of sovereign and subject in Joseon. At the least, the term, Yeonseol(演說) seemed to have the critical meaning to the politic system of toward the end of the 19th century because the activity or media of Yeonseol(演說) made the public opinion field of democracy and took the propagation of new thought through the leverage of the human voice. The old politic forces of the Daehan empire made desperate efforts to control the political nature of Yeonseol(演說). The representative example of such a repression was the compulsory winding-up of the independence association(獨立協會) through the imperial order of the dispersal of the private association. Guardians of the imperial power tried to establish the law of the rally and the organization of private association. Consequentially, no private association has been admitted in Joseon after the dissolution of the independence association(獨立協會), until Iljin association came to establish in 1904, relying on Japan imperial power. Then, the Korean people tried to establish the society claim to be non-politic naturally, stuck in the double restriction of the Daehan empire and Japan imperial power. For example, the people education association(國民敎育會) published the association rule in “Daehanmail shinbo(大韓每日申報)” and “Hwangsung Shinmun(皇城新聞)”, in each Korean, and Korean and Chinese. Then, they found Gangron(講論) and Gangyeon(講演) in the possible substitution of Yeoseol(演說), the prohibition term. Since then, “Hwangsung Shinmun(皇城新聞)” tried to use the term, Gangyeon (講演) and to distinguish it and Yeonseol(演說), and it came to the origin of the functional separation of Yeonseol(演說) and Gangyeon(講演) throughout the Japanese Ruling Era.
Abstract
This Study focuses on determining that the translated term of “speech”, Yeonseol (演說) had the distinct tendency to violate against the politic fundamental that has been laid the foundation of the loyal road politics throughout the Joseon Dynasty,with the homophones in Korean, Yeonseol(筵說) has represented the relations of sovereign and subject in Joseon. At the least, the term, Yeonseol(演說) seemed to have the critical meaning to the politic system of toward the end of the 19th century because the activity or media of Yeonseol(演說) made the public opinion field of democracy and took the propagation of new thought through the leverage of the human voice. The old politic forces of the Daehan empire made desperate efforts to control the political nature of Yeonseol(演說). The representative example of such a repression was the compulsory winding-up of the independence association(獨立協會) through the imperial order of the dispersal of the private association. Guardians of the imperial power tried to establish the law of the rally and the organization of private association. Consequentially, no private association has been admitted in Joseon after the dissolution of the independence association(獨立協會), until Iljin association came to establish in 1904, relying on Japan imperial power. Then, the Korean people tried to establish the society claim to be non-politic naturally, stuck in the double restriction of the Daehan empire and Japan imperial power. For example, the people education association(國民敎育會) published the association rule in “Daehanmail shinbo(大韓每日申報)” and “Hwangsung Shinmun(皇城新聞)”, in each Korean, and Korean and Chinese. Then, they found Gangron(講論) and Gangyeon(講演) in the possible substitution of Yeoseol(演說), the prohibition term. Since then, “Hwangsung Shinmun(皇城新聞)” tried to use the term, Gangyeon (講演) and to distinguish it and Yeonseol(演說), and it came to the origin of the functional separation of Yeonseol(演說) and Gangyeon(講演) throughout the Japanese Ruling Era.
참고문헌 (42)
- J. S. Gale, "韓英字典(Korean-English Dictionary)", pp.699~ (1911), The Fukuin Printing Co
- "대한매일신보 1904년 8월 24일자 잡보 일진회", ~ (1904)
- "대한매일신보 1904년 9월 9일자, 2면, 國民敎育會규측의대요", ~ (1904)
- "독립신문", ~
- "독립신문 1896 년 12월 3일자", 1~ (1896)
- "독립신문 1898년 11월 22일자, 어젓긔 광경", 1~ (1898)
- "독립신문 1898년 11월 22일자", 2~ (1898)
- "독립신문 1898년 12월 27일자", 1~2 (1898)
- "독립신문 1898년 1월 27일자, 슈뎡 위원", 2~ (1898)
- "독립신문 1899년 1월 10일자", 2~ (1899)
- "독립신문 1899년 1월 21일자, 3면, 집회 集會와 밋 협회 규례외 밋 보안 保安죠례에 관계 된 쳥의셔", ~ (1899)
- "독립신문 1899년 1월 27일자", 1~2 (1899)
- "매일신문 1899년 2월 4일자", 3~ (1899)
- "承政院日記", ~
- "신판 獨立協會연구 : 독립신문·獨立協會·萬民共同會의 사상과 운동 상·하권" (2006), 일조각
- "皇城新聞 1899년 1월 17일자", 2~ (1899)
- "皇城新聞 1901년 11월 25일자, 被捉自現", 2~ (1901)
- "皇城新聞 1904년 10월 19일자, 天荒漸闢", ~ (1904)
- "皇城新聞 1904년 8월 22일자, 一進會聞", 3~ (1904)
- "皇城新聞 1904년 8월 27일자", 3~ (1904)
- "皇城新聞 1904년 9월 19일자", 3~ (1904)
- "皇城新聞 1905년 1월 27일자, 法校開學詳報", 2~ (1905)
- "皇城新聞 1905년 4월 10일자, 沁校講演", 1~ (1905)
- "皇城新聞 1905년 7월 21일자, 萬國平和會議의 提出問題", 2~ (1905)
- "皇城新聞 1906년 4월 3일자", 2~ (1906)
- "皇城新聞 1906년 6월 23일자", 3~ (1906)
- "皇城新聞 1907년 7월 31일자", 1~ (1907)
- 김권정, "愛國啓蒙派의 기독교 인식에 관한 연구 : 『大韓每日申報』를 중심으로", 숭실사학, 17, pp.69~73 (2004), 숭실사학회
- 김종준, "대한제국말기(1904~1910년) 일진회 연구", 박사, pp.2008
- 김창제, "연설법요령", 청춘, 7 (1917)
- 민족문화추진위원회, "신편 국역 고종승정원일기" (2005), 한국학술정보
- 福澤諭吉, "緖言, In 福澤全集 1", pp.80~81 (1898), 時事新報社
- 小森陽一, "일본어의 근대 : 근대 국민국가와 ‘국어’의 발견", pp.46~ (2003), 소명출판
- 愼鏞廈, "獨立協會의 사회사상의 사회학적 연구", 박사, pp.1975
- 신지영, "연설, 토론이라는 제도의 유입과 감각의 변화", 한국근대문학연구, (11), pp.9~41 (2005), 한국근대문학회
- 전영우, "한국 근대토론의 사적연구" (1991), 일지사
- 정진석, "대한제국 최초의 신문지조례 제정과 그 내용", 언론중재 (2001), 언론중재위원회
- 정진석, "역사와 언론인", pp.164~180 (2001), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 제임스 게일, "Korea in transition" (1909), Laymen’s Missionary Movement
- 최기영, "한말 國民敎育會의 설립에 관한 검토", 한국근현대사연구, 1, pp.29~30 (1994), 한국근현대사학회
- C.Levy, "한불자전 DICTIONNAIRE CORÉEN-FRANCAIS", pp.130~ (1880), imprimeur-libraire
- 홍순애, "근대소설의 형성과 연설의 미디어적 연계성 연구 -1910년대를 중심으로-", 현대소설연구, (42), pp.599~626 (2009), 한국현대소설학회
