조선 전기와 후기의 혈연의식 비교-‘族’ 관련 용어와 권리의무관계를 중심으로
A Comparative Study of the “Kindred Consciousness” in the Early and Latter Halves of the Joseon Dynasty period - Examination of the ‘Kinsmen(族)’-related terms, and the people’s relationship of privileges and obligations -
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the early half of the Joseon dynasty period, the degree of ‘closeness between people’ was gauged by their closeness in terms of their kinsmen-based relationship. The closeness between the ‘ancestors’ and ‘descendants’ naturally grew more and more diluted, as they grew apart from each other in terms of generations. The fundamental element of the kindred relationship was the relationship between the parents and the offsprings, and any relationships beyond the grandparents- grandchildren relationship range were significantly weak. Yet such kind of ‘kindred consciousness’ and ‘kindred relationship’ changed, particularly around the late 16th century. Existing interpretation of the Inheritance law was overthrown, and new perspectives viewing the range and principles of the practice of inheritance were presented. Finally in the 18th century, kinship-related terms were modified to reflect the reinforced patrilineal reality of the time, and related laws that had been enacted during the early days of the dynasty were either rendered irrelevant or revised. With such changes in place, the closeness between individuals came to be decided by their closeness in terms of patrilineal relationships, and not just of any kind of kinship relationship. Privileges and obligations generated by patrilineal relationships continued to exist, yet such concepts meant for non-patrilineal relationships were reduced and eventually disappeared. In the early half period of the Joseon dynasty, patrilineal elements did not factor in the people’s lives and consciousness, yet it came to do so rather dominantly, in the following periods.
Abstract
In the early half of the Joseon dynasty period, the degree of ‘closeness between people’ was gauged by their closeness in terms of their kinsmen-based relationship. The closeness between the ‘ancestors’ and ‘descendants’ naturally grew more and more diluted, as they grew apart from each other in terms of generations. The fundamental element of the kindred relationship was the relationship between the parents and the offsprings, and any relationships beyond the grandparents- grandchildren relationship range were significantly weak. Yet such kind of ‘kindred consciousness’ and ‘kindred relationship’ changed, particularly around the late 16th century. Existing interpretation of the Inheritance law was overthrown, and new perspectives viewing the range and principles of the practice of inheritance were presented. Finally in the 18th century, kinship-related terms were modified to reflect the reinforced patrilineal reality of the time, and related laws that had been enacted during the early days of the dynasty were either rendered irrelevant or revised. With such changes in place, the closeness between individuals came to be decided by their closeness in terms of patrilineal relationships, and not just of any kind of kinship relationship. Privileges and obligations generated by patrilineal relationships continued to exist, yet such concepts meant for non-patrilineal relationships were reduced and eventually disappeared. In the early half period of the Joseon dynasty, patrilineal elements did not factor in the people’s lives and consciousness, yet it came to do so rather dominantly, in the following periods.
참고문헌 (34)
- 박병호, "우리나라 솔서혼속에 유래된 친족과 금혼범위 : 모족 처족을 중심으로", 법학, 4(2) (1962)
- 최재석, "한국가족제도사연구" (1983), 일지사
- 노명호, "산음장적을 통해 본 17세기 초 촌락의 혈연 양상", 한국사론, 5 (1979)
- 문숙자, "조선시대 재산상속과 가족" (2004), 경인문화사
- 이종서, "고려·조선의 친족용어와 혈연의식 : 친족관계의 정형과 변동" (2009), 신구문화사
- 이종서, "高麗後期 이후 ‘同氣’ 理論의 전개와血緣意識의 變動", 동방학지, (120), pp.1~35 (2003), 국학연구원
- 함한희, "한국사학과 인접학문 : 인류학을 중심으로", 한국사시민강좌, 20 (1997)
- 김주희, "조선시대 출계율 논쟁: '족'(族) 관련 개념들을 중심으로", 한국문화인류학, 38(1), pp.205~234 (2005), 한국문화인류학회
- 박병호, "우리나라 솔서혼속에 유래된 친족과 금혼범위 : 모족 처족을 중심으로", 법학, 4(2) (1962)
- 노명호, "고려의 오복친과 친족관계 법제", 한국사연구, 33 (1981)
- 이종서, "14~16세기 한국의 친족용어와 일상 친족관계", 박사, pp.2003
- 정긍식, "1999 16세기사송법서집성", pp.29~ (1999), 한국법제연구원
- 임상혁, "대전사송유취와 조선전기의 법이론", 법제연구, 18 (2000)
- "世宗實錄", ~
- "經國大典", ~
- "經國大典註解", ~
- "太宗實錄", ~
- "高峯集", ~
- "成宗實錄", ~
- "성종실록", ~
- "眉巖集", ~
- "晦谷集", ~
- "爾雅, In 釋親", ~
- "與猶堂全書", ~
- "順菴集", ~
- "性潭集", ~
- "靑莊館全書", ~
- "硏經齋全集", ~
- "弘齋全書", ~
- "五洲衍文長箋散稿", ~
- "정조실록", ~
- "일성록", ~
- "국역승정원일기", ~
- "한국고전종합DB"[URL]
