조선후기 체제인식과 민중운동 試論
A Tentative Investigation about the Thoughts on the Monarchy and the Popular Movements in the Late Joseon Period
2
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The popular movements in the late Joseon period were ultimately supposed to overthrow the monarchy. Although Joseon people couldn’t reach to reset the relationship with the hierarchy or bring about a system revolution for themselves, we should keep studying what direction such tasks were being performed in. The ‘people-first’ ideology formulated in the early Joseon was progressive to stress the duty of the political elite. However, it was still the logic to justify the small ruling class. Including Jeong Yakyong in the 19th century, thinkers in the Joseon state did not seem to get over the Joseon ‘people-first’ ideology and organize a political ideology toward a new system. Meanwhile, Joseon dynasty was established to be crowned by subjects and two kings were replaced in the name of the restoration justified by subjects. They had stressed to the king that there were values more important than a state or a royal family. All efforts to stand against state power and its violence became people’s political capability. People’s movements in the 19th century succeeded to their social experience of the previous time. It will be the significant task for study of popular movements to catch how the direct challenge against the state power was organized and performed.
Abstract
The popular movements in the late Joseon period were ultimately supposed to overthrow the monarchy. Although Joseon people couldn’t reach to reset the relationship with the hierarchy or bring about a system revolution for themselves, we should keep studying what direction such tasks were being performed in. The ‘people-first’ ideology formulated in the early Joseon was progressive to stress the duty of the political elite. However, it was still the logic to justify the small ruling class. Including Jeong Yakyong in the 19th century, thinkers in the Joseon state did not seem to get over the Joseon ‘people-first’ ideology and organize a political ideology toward a new system. Meanwhile, Joseon dynasty was established to be crowned by subjects and two kings were replaced in the name of the restoration justified by subjects. They had stressed to the king that there were values more important than a state or a royal family. All efforts to stand against state power and its violence became people’s political capability. People’s movements in the 19th century succeeded to their social experience of the previous time. It will be the significant task for study of popular movements to catch how the direct challenge against the state power was organized and performed.
참고문헌 (31)
- 오수창, "18세기 조선 정치사상과 그 전후 맥락", 역사학보, (213), pp.25~48 (2012), 역사학회[DOI]
- "태조실록", ~
- 蕭公權, "중국 정치사상사", pp.157~162 (1998), 서울대학교 출판문화원
- 김훈식, "15세기 민본이데올로기와 그 변화", 역사와 현실, (창간), pp.186~190 (1989)
- 이석규, "麗末鮮初 新興儒臣의 民에 대한 인식, In ‘민’에서 ‘민족’으로", pp.37~38 (2006), 선인
- 배항섭, "19세기 지배질서의 변화와 정치문화의 변용 －仁政 願望의 향방을 중심으로－", 韓國史學報, (39), pp.109~158 (2010), 고려사학회
- 이석규, "조선초기 관인층의 민에 대한 인식 : 민본사상과 관련하여", 역사학보, 151, pp.55~ (1996)
- 이이화, "허균의 생각", pp.67~70 (1980), 뿌리깊은 나무
- 김백철, "조선후기 영조의 탕평정치", pp.211~277 (2010), 태학사
- 김인걸, "정조의 ‘국체’ 인식, In 정조와 정조시대", pp.120~123 (2011), 서울대 출판문화원
- 신용하, "조선후기 실학파의 사회사상연구", pp.54~63 (1997), 지식산업사
- 박충석, "한국 정치사상사 제2판", pp.397~398 (2010), 삼영사
- 강명관, "과연 탈중세적 인물인가", 한겨레신문 2012년 6월 20일자, 23~ (2012)
- 백민정, "정약용의 철학", pp.371~384 (2007), 이학사
- 李迎春, "조선후기 왕위계승 연구", pp.14~ (1998), 집문당
- 오수창, "국왕과 신료의 역학관계, In 조선중기 정치와 정책 : 인조-현종 시기", pp.41~49 (2003), 아카넷
- "｢太祖朝故事本末｣ 중 ｢開國定都｣, In 燃藜室記述 권1", pp.607~610 (1966), 민족문화추진회
- "朝野輯要 권2", pp.40~41 (1990), 여강출판사
- "중종실록", ~
- "승정원일기", ~
- "인조실록", ~
- 여진천, "황사영 백서의 원본과 이본에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 이장우, "한국천주교회사 2", pp.78~82 (2010), 한국교회사연구소
- 고석규, "19세기 조선의 향촌사회연구", pp.341~347 (1998), 서울대출판부
- 다산연구회, "역주 목민심서 II", pp.101~103 (1979), 창작과비평사
- "｢孝宗朝故事本末｣ 중 ｢金弘郁杖死｣, In 燃藜室記述 권30", pp.480~481 (1966), 민족문화추진회
- 오수창, "시대와 인물, 그리고 사회의식" (2009), 태학사
- 정석종, "조선후기의 정치와 사상", pp.286~309 (1994), 한길사
- 이종범, "1728년 무신란의 성격, In 조선시대 정치사의 재조명" (1985), 범조사
- 한명기, "1892년 농민전쟁연구 : 18․19세기의 농민항쟁, In 1892년 농민전쟁연구 : 18․19세기의 농민항쟁", pp.114~121 (1992), 역사비평사
- 김선경, "19세기 농민 저항의 정치 : 1862년 농민항쟁, 官民 관계 위기와 법 담론", 역사연구, 16, pp.125~128 (2006), 역사학연구소