본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고려 按察使의 연원과 ‘五道按察使’의 성립

Origin of the Anchal-sa(按察使) post in Goryeo, and the Establishment of the ‘5-Do Anchal-sa system(五道按察使)

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

In this article, the institutional origin of the Goryeo dynasty Anchal-sa(按察使) magistrates which operated in the Do(道) units, and how the ‘5-Do Ancahl-sa(五道按察使)’ system was established, are examined. The history of the Anchal-sa institution is documented in the “An’ryeom-sa(按廉使)” section of the “Governmental Officials and Offices(百官志)” chapter of 『Goryeo-sa(高麗史)』. But this record is a combination of information gathered from several sources, and is not a correct representation of the actual Anchal-sa history. The original name of Anchal-sa was “Sun’chal-sa(巡察使)” but it was changed to Anchal-sa in the 19th year of King Hyeonjong’s reign to avoid using the letter which was also the name of the king. The title “Seohae Sun’chal-sa(西海巡察使)” which appears in the “Gong’cheob Sangtong-shik(公牒相通式)” section of the “Penal Law(刑法志)” chapter refers to the Anchal-sa figure of the Seo’hae-do province(西海道按察使). The “Dong’hae Sun’chal-sa(東海巡察使)” that appears together is the same thing with the “Sun’geom-sa” figure of the Gyeongsang-do province(慶尙道巡檢使) and is also the same with the Dongnam’ hae-Dobu’seo-sa(東南海都部署使). The function of this post was absorbed by the Gyeongsang-do province’s Anchal-sa magistrate and was abolished at the end of King Munjong’s reign. This led people to believe that the two posts were institutionally linked, but in fact they were totally unrelated. After the provincial monitoring system expanded throughout the country and the 5 Do provinces were established, the Anchal-sa system became a dynastic one. The dispatching of “Anmu-sa(安撫使)” officials in the 2nd year of King Yejong’s reign provided a definitive platform for the establishment of Anchal-sa figures, but Chunju-do(春州道) was founded later and the ‘5-Do Anchal-sa’ system was finally launched during the reign of King Euijong.

Abstract

In this article, the institutional origin of the Goryeo dynasty Anchal-sa(按察使) magistrates which operated in the Do(道) units, and how the ‘5-Do Ancahl-sa(五道按察使)’ system was established, are examined. The history of the Anchal-sa institution is documented in the “An’ryeom-sa(按廉使)” section of the “Governmental Officials and Offices(百官志)” chapter of 『Goryeo-sa(高麗史)』. But this record is a combination of information gathered from several sources, and is not a correct representation of the actual Anchal-sa history. The original name of Anchal-sa was “Sun’chal-sa(巡察使)” but it was changed to Anchal-sa in the 19th year of King Hyeonjong’s reign to avoid using the letter which was also the name of the king. The title “Seohae Sun’chal-sa(西海巡察使)” which appears in the “Gong’cheob Sangtong-shik(公牒相通式)” section of the “Penal Law(刑法志)” chapter refers to the Anchal-sa figure of the Seo’hae-do province(西海道按察使). The “Dong’hae Sun’chal-sa(東海巡察使)” that appears together is the same thing with the “Sun’geom-sa” figure of the Gyeongsang-do province(慶尙道巡檢使) and is also the same with the Dongnam’ hae-Dobu’seo-sa(東南海都部署使). The function of this post was absorbed by the Gyeongsang-do province’s Anchal-sa magistrate and was abolished at the end of King Munjong’s reign. This led people to believe that the two posts were institutionally linked, but in fact they were totally unrelated. After the provincial monitoring system expanded throughout the country and the 5 Do provinces were established, the Anchal-sa system became a dynastic one. The dispatching of “Anmu-sa(安撫使)” officials in the 2nd year of King Yejong’s reign provided a definitive platform for the establishment of Anchal-sa figures, but Chunju-do(春州道) was founded later and the ‘5-Do Anchal-sa’ system was finally launched during the reign of King Euijong.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 河炫綱, "高麗 地方制度의 一硏究(上․下) : 道制를 中心으로", 史學硏究, 13, 14 (1962)
  2. 邊太燮, "高麗按察使考", 歷史學報, 40 (1968)
  3. 金潤坤, "麗代의 按察使制度 成立과 그 背景", 嶠南史學, (창간) (1985)
  4. 윤경진, "고려전기 道의 다원적 편성과 5道의 성립", 동방학지, (135), pp.1~46 (2006), 국학연구원
  5. "高麗史", ~
  6. 金南奎, "高麗 都部署考", 史叢, 11 (1966)
  7. 김호종, "東南海都部署使의 設置와 그 機能 : 金州本營을 中心으로", 民族文化論叢, 20 (1999)
  8. 윤경진, "高麗史 刑法志 公牒相通式 外官條의 분석", 역사문화연구, (27), pp.34~88 (2007), 역사문화연구소
  9. 윤경진, "고려 태조대 都護府 설치의 추이와 운영- 북방 개척과 통일전쟁 -", 군사, (64), pp.161~192 (2007), 국방부군사편찬연구소
  10. 윤경진, "고려 태조-광종대 북방 개척과 州鎭 설치: 『高麗史』 地理志 北界 州鎭 연혁의 분석과 補正", 규장각, (37), pp.251~288 (2010), 규장각한국학연구원
  11. 윤경진, "고려 성종-현종초 북방 개척과 州鎭 설치", 역사문화연구, (38), pp.59~94 (2011), 역사문화연구소
  12. 金南奎, "高麗 兩界의 監倉使에 對하여", 史叢, 17․18 (1973)
  13. 윤경진, "고려초기 10道制의 시행과 운영체계", 진단학보, (101), pp.99~134 (2006), 진단학회
  14. "東文選", ~
  15. "高麗墓誌銘集成", ~
  16. 윤경진, "朝鮮初期 郡縣體制의 개편과 運營體系의 변화", 韓國史論, 25 (1991)
  17. "高麗史節要", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)