朱子의 『易學啓蒙』에 근거한 東武의 易學的 思惟의 특징 -『格致藁』를 중심으로 -

Abstract

In this paper, studied about Dongmu’s thinking system on I-ching centered around contents about Zhuzi(朱子)’s the second volume Yuanguahua(「原卦畫」) of I-chingqimeng. Academic topics about Dongmu’s I-ching supposed on Kogchigo can be summerised in Three. First, it is that Dongmu’s I-ching quoted the first volume of Xici(繫辭) chapter 11st paragraph 'the Change Has TaiJi(易有太極)'. Second, It took name of subtitle on Bansungzam(「反誠箴」) from BokheePalkyedo(伏羲八卦圖). Dongmu said that atrigram’s names and meanings in BokheePalkyedo are identical to his opinion. And Dongmu said that some are different from his’, too. Third, he said that I-ching include principles of human nature mentioning MunwangPalkyedo(文王八卦圖) in Yulak(「儒略」). These I-ching’s Academic topics refered by Dongmu are correspond to the subject of the second volume Yuanguahua(「原卦畫」) of I-chingqimeng. But We can confirm that Dongmu’s mention about I-ching is identical with the subject of Yuanguahua(「原卦畫」), but are differernt point of view in definite contents. First, Zhuzi said that Yangui(兩儀) is Yin and Yang in I-chingqimeng, Sa-Sang is Taiyang(太陽)․Taium(太陰)․Soyang(少陽)․Soum(少陰) quoting paragraph 'the Change Has TaiJi’, defined about formation of the study of the Righteousness in situation on the basis of ‘TaiJi(太極)’. Meanwhile, Dongmu prescribed Yangui as SimSin(心身), and said that Sa-Sang is SaSimsinMul(事心身物) so mentioned centered around existential human From the viewpoint of medical. And in I-chingqimeng, he referenced that BokheePalkyedo and MunwangPalkyedo are Kyedo(卦圖) meaning SunHuchun(先後天). He  insistenced different kinds of view about 四象 and 八卦 through BokheePalkyedo. But Dongmu didn’t use a general idea of SunHuchun, just said his thinkings are different from BokheePalkyedo. He made an assertion creatively that MunwangPalkyedo include principles of human nature