고종 친정 초기 지방관 임용과 당파 정치: 함경도 지방관 임용에 대한 사례 연구
Policy and Politics on Personnel Administration: A Case Study of Local official north-east area in the 19th century
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study reveals that the faction arrangement worked on personnel administration of the local officials of the King Kojong's period through the north-east area's local officials, which shows the faction politics and policies. King declared direct rule and tried to eliminate the political group that were the base of Daewongun, which explicitly excluded the political group that Daewongun exerciesd in consideration of the faction. However, the faction politics of King has hardly been discussed so far. So why has this policy not been noticed so far, and What kind of faction politics played and what was the specifics? Until now, researchers have figured out the period of King Kojong in the framework of the Sedo politics, and understood that the influence of the faction was weakened. In addition, there were not many data showing specific cases of personnel administration in consideration of factions. However, the north-east area's register of officials to be examined in this study specifies local officials's faction and families of origin in relation to local officials. It is presumed that the register of officials were made by the government, it is difficult to preserve which has recorded the official's faction and their families records. At that time, the fact that the family members and the factions were important indicators of the appointment were all recognized, but it should never have been officially revealed. Therefore, this study will focus on such records and discuss the faction politics in the appointment of local officials in north-east area. First of all, this study focused on the analysis of the register of officials, and then reviewed the data such as the mu-bo(武譜), and the um-an(蔭案) in relation to the history of local officials to identify the complex background surrounding local officials employees. It is presumed that there was a complicated policies in the appointment of office, but this is not revealed in the officially. In the register of officials which was not noted in the previous studies showed that there was a faction appointment in the office in the 19th century. Therefore, this register of official is an important source to understand of faction politics and policies of King. The study could be a new starting point for discussing political history and political culture in the late 19th century by capturing the faction politics which was revealed through the case of the register of official.
Abstract
This study reveals that the faction arrangement worked on personnel administration of the local officials of the King Kojong's period through the north-east area's local officials, which shows the faction politics and policies. King declared direct rule and tried to eliminate the political group that were the base of Daewongun, which explicitly excluded the political group that Daewongun exerciesd in consideration of the faction. However, the faction politics of King has hardly been discussed so far. So why has this policy not been noticed so far, and What kind of faction politics played and what was the specifics? Until now, researchers have figured out the period of King Kojong in the framework of the Sedo politics, and understood that the influence of the faction was weakened. In addition, there were not many data showing specific cases of personnel administration in consideration of factions. However, the north-east area's register of officials to be examined in this study specifies local officials's faction and families of origin in relation to local officials. It is presumed that the register of officials were made by the government, it is difficult to preserve which has recorded the official's faction and their families records. At that time, the fact that the family members and the factions were important indicators of the appointment were all recognized, but it should never have been officially revealed. Therefore, this study will focus on such records and discuss the faction politics in the appointment of local officials in north-east area. First of all, this study focused on the analysis of the register of officials, and then reviewed the data such as the mu-bo(武譜), and the um-an(蔭案) in relation to the history of local officials to identify the complex background surrounding local officials employees. It is presumed that there was a complicated policies in the appointment of office, but this is not revealed in the officially. In the register of officials which was not noted in the previous studies showed that there was a faction appointment in the office in the 19th century. Therefore, this register of official is an important source to understand of faction politics and policies of King. The study could be a new starting point for discussing political history and political culture in the late 19th century by capturing the faction politics which was revealed through the case of the register of official.
참고문헌 (50)
- 이원균, "조선시대의 수령직 교체실태: 東萊府使의 경우", 역사와세계, 3, pp.61~86 (1979)
- 구완회, "선생안을 통해 본 조선후기의 수령", 복현사림, 4, pp.189~232 (1982)
- 이존희, "조선초기의 수령제도", 역사교육, 30․31, pp.29~85 (1982)
- 임승표, "18,9세기 文․武․蔭官邑制", 민족문화, 16, pp.197~234 (1993)
- 이동희, "19세기 전반 수령의 임용실태", 전북사학, 11, pp.211~236 (1989)
- 박정민, "함경도 『觀察使先生案』의 명단 검토와 재임 실태", 전북사학, (52), pp.63~96 (2018), 전북사학회[DOI]
- 오용원, "祈雨祭儀를 통해 본 영남 지방관의 일상과 대민의식", 영남학, (16), pp.125~160 (2009), 영남문화연구원[DOI]
- 채휘균, "시험의 힘: 지방관의 영향력 행사와 이미지 형성 - 조선후기 수령의 개인기록을 중심으로 -", 영남학, (15), pp.189~228 (2009), 영남문화연구원[DOI]
- 김성윤, "吳宖黙(1834∼?)을 통해서 본 수령 군현통치의 과정과 전략", 조선시대사학보, (53), pp.83~140 (2010), 조선시대사학회
- 박동욱, "조선 지방관의 고단한 서북(西北) 체험-「북정고」를 중심으로-", 영남학, (23), pp.37~61 (2013), 영남문화연구원[DOI]
- 김건우, "조선후기 어느 지역민의 지방관 인식 - 구상덕의 『승총명록』을 중심으로 -", 古文書硏究, 45, pp.77~93 (2014), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
- 糟谷憲一, "大院君政權の權力構造", 東洋史硏究, 49(2), pp.140~163 (1990)
- 은정태, "고종친정 이후 정치체제 개혁과 정치세력의 동향", 한국사론, 40, pp.159~214 (1998)
- 안외순, "고종의 초기(1864-1873) 대외인식 변화와 친정", 한국정치학회보, 30, pp.247~265 (1996)
- 김병우, "고종의 친정체제 형성기 정치세력의 동향", 대구사학, 63 (2001)
- 장영숙, "고종의 정권운영과 閔氏戚族의 정치적 역할", 한국학, 31(3), pp.183~212 (2008), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- 김성혜, "고종 재위 전기 강관의 구성(1864-1876)", 한국문화, (46), pp.53~83 (2009), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 김성혜, "1873년 고종의 통치권 장악 과정에 대한 일고찰", 대동문화연구, (72), pp.341~387 (2010), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- 김성혜, "고종 친정 직후 정치적 기반 형성과 그 특징(1874～1876)", 한국근현대사연구, (52), pp.7~48 (2010), 한국근현대사학회
- 김덕헌, "19세기 후반 당파 정치와당파 기록물의 이중성― 승정원일기(초)와 조보(초)의 사례 분석을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (105), pp.375~404 (2019), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- "일성록", ~
- "한국고전종합DB"[URL]
- "성종실록 권178", ~
- "세종실록 권35", ~
- "중종실록 권95", ~
- "한古朝57-가451", ~
- "관북관안", ~
- 강석화, "조선후기 함경도와 북방영토의식" (2000), 경세원
- 오수창, "19세기 초 평안도 사회문제에 대한 지방민과 중앙관리의 인식과 정책", 한국문화, (36), pp.125~156 (2005), 규장각한국학연구원
- 오수창, "조선시대 평안도 출신 문신(文臣)에 대한 차별과 통청(通淸)", 한국문화연구, 15, pp.45~78 (2008), 한국문화연구원[DOI]
- 강석화, "19세기 함경도 지역의 환폐(還弊)와 민의 동요", 역사학보, (232), pp.261~281 (2016), 역사학회[DOI]
- 김백철, "조선시대 咸鏡道 지역사 試論 - 奎章閣소장 地理志자료를 중심으로 -", 규장각, (51), pp.1~62 (2017), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- Maurice Courant, "韓國書誌", pp.395~ (1994), 일조각
- 이건식, "韓國 家系記錄資料의 家系 데이터 모델에 관한 硏究", 藏書閣, (16), pp.195~232 (2006), 한국학중앙연구원
- "道內官案", ~
- "규장각한국학연구원 소장(奎 27370)", ~
- 차장섭, "조선후기 벌열연구", pp.29~ (1997), 일조각
- 마르티나 도이힐러, "한국의 유교화 과정" (2013), 너머북스
- "고종실록 권3", ~ (1866)
- "선조실록", ~
- 장필기, "조선후기 『무보』의 자료적 검토", 조선시대사학보, 7, pp.155~ (1998)
- 강석화, "조선후기 확대된 영토의식과 북방지역 18세기 함경도지역의 개발과 사족", 역사비평, 37, pp.366~378 (1996)
- 車長燮, "綾城具氏 族譜의 刊行과 그 特徵", 韓國史學報, (22), pp.303~331 (2006), 고려사학회
- 장필기, "조선후기 무반가계의 구성과 벌열화", 민족문화논총, 25, pp.148~ (2002)
- 김성희, "『1872년 郡縣地圖』의 소장 현황과 장황 형태", 규장각, (46), pp.149~174 (2015), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 문상명, "『1872년 지방지도』에 나타나는 조선 후기 지역 사회의 특수성 -함경도를 중심으로", 열상고전연구, (50), pp.173~221 (2016), 열상고전연구회[DOI]
- "承政院日記", ~
- 김성혜, "고종시대 군주권 위협 사건에 대한 일고찰", 한국문화연구, 18, pp.125~166 (2010), 한국문화연구원[DOI]
- "승정원일기(초)", ~ (1864)
- 한철호, "고종 친정 초(1874) 암행어사 파견과 그 활동: 지방관 징치를 중심으로", 사학지, 31, pp.193~244 (1874)