한말 ‘立憲政體’ 논의와 ‘민주공화’의 의미
The discussion about the Costitutional System of Government and Democracy․Republic’s meaning at the end of the Korean Empire
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the internal reasons for the adoption of democratic republican government in the Korean Provisional government, centering on the constitutional system of government theory that was discussed as a construction plan for the modern nation. Since 1905, the concern of the enlightenment intellectuals has focused on the change of the form of government rather than the democratic principles of the modern political system or the fundamental rights of the people. It was a declarative argument that came from the recognition that people’s sovereignty or civil rights were a national community. They recognized democracy as ‘non-monarchy’(非君主) or ‘republic’. Moreover, in the presence of monarchs, republican was the meaning of treason, so they favored the constitutional monarchy as a means of building a modern state. However, since the late Joseon Dynasty, the civil rights consciousness that grew from below has had a great influence on the enlightened intellectuals of the Daehanmaeilshinbo(大韓每日申報) line. Since 1904, local people have participated in a local civil rights movement called Iljinhae(一進會), which has promoted national civil rights. In 1907, the late patriotic soldier recognized Kojong’s demise of the Crown as a “the fall of a nation” and made himself clear that they were a sovereign as the representative of Korean people. Reflecting such a sense of sovereignty of the people, the Daehanmaeilshinbo emphasized people's sovereignty more. This indwelled consciousness of people's sovereignty was the driving force of the republican government movement, which was developed at home and abroad after the illegal annexation of Japan in 1910. The March 1 movement, which won people's sovereignty, played a decisive role in the establishment of the provisional government of the Democratic Republic in April 1919. At this time, democratic republic was not far from the democratic and republican consciousness. Democracy in a democratic republic is synonymous with republic, and the emphasis is on people's sovereignty. For this reason, it is clear that the Democratic Republic of the 1919 Provisional Charter was a landmark event, but it is an overestimation from the historical fact that this democratic republic is interpreted or evaluated in the Western and contemporary sense.
Abstract
This paper examines the internal reasons for the adoption of democratic republican government in the Korean Provisional government, centering on the constitutional system of government theory that was discussed as a construction plan for the modern nation. Since 1905, the concern of the enlightenment intellectuals has focused on the change of the form of government rather than the democratic principles of the modern political system or the fundamental rights of the people. It was a declarative argument that came from the recognition that people’s sovereignty or civil rights were a national community. They recognized democracy as ‘non-monarchy’(非君主) or ‘republic’. Moreover, in the presence of monarchs, republican was the meaning of treason, so they favored the constitutional monarchy as a means of building a modern state. However, since the late Joseon Dynasty, the civil rights consciousness that grew from below has had a great influence on the enlightened intellectuals of the Daehanmaeilshinbo(大韓每日申報) line. Since 1904, local people have participated in a local civil rights movement called Iljinhae(一進會), which has promoted national civil rights. In 1907, the late patriotic soldier recognized Kojong’s demise of the Crown as a “the fall of a nation” and made himself clear that they were a sovereign as the representative of Korean people. Reflecting such a sense of sovereignty of the people, the Daehanmaeilshinbo emphasized people's sovereignty more. This indwelled consciousness of people's sovereignty was the driving force of the republican government movement, which was developed at home and abroad after the illegal annexation of Japan in 1910. The March 1 movement, which won people's sovereignty, played a decisive role in the establishment of the provisional government of the Democratic Republic in April 1919. At this time, democratic republic was not far from the democratic and republican consciousness. Democracy in a democratic republic is synonymous with republic, and the emphasis is on people's sovereignty. For this reason, it is clear that the Democratic Republic of the 1919 Provisional Charter was a landmark event, but it is an overestimation from the historical fact that this democratic republic is interpreted or evaluated in the Western and contemporary sense.
참고문헌 (57)
- 이영록, "한국에서의 ‘민주공화국’의 개념사 －특히 ‘공화’ 개념을 중심으로 -", 법사학연구, (42), pp.49~83 (2010), 한국법사학회[DOI]
- 신용하, "한국의 근대국가형성과 민족문제" (1986), 문화학과 지성사
- 이승현, "신민회(新民會)의 국가건설사상: 공화제를 향하여", 한국학, 29(1), pp.55~78 (2006), 한국학중앙연구원
- 유영렬, "한국에 있어서 근대적 政體論의 변화과정", 국사관논총, 103 (2003)
- 박찬승, "한국의 근대국가 건설운동과 공화제", 역사학보, (200), pp.305~344 (2008), 역사학회
- 전종익, "대한민국임시정부 이전 정치체제 구상 －1910년대 군주제와 공화제를 중심으로－", 법사학연구, (56), pp.219~248 (2017), 한국법사학회[DOI]
- 윤대원, "한말 일제 초기 정체론의 논의 과정과 민주공화제의 수용", 중국근현대사연구, 21 (2001)
- 신주백, "1910년 전후 군주제에서 민주공화정체로 정치이념의 전환 - 공화론과 대동론을 중심으로 -", 한국민족운동사연구, (93), pp.151~184 (2017), 한국민족운동사학회[DOI]
- 鄭玉子, "紳士遊覽團考", 歷史學報, 27, pp.135~ (1965)
- "歐美立憲政體論", 漢城旬報, ~ (1884)
- "民主主義와 各國의 章程 및 公議堂에 대한 解釋", 漢城旬報, ~ (1884)
- 朴泳孝, "日本外交文書 21", pp.306~ (1964)
- 兪吉濬, "西遊見聞" (1969), 景仁文化社
- 김동택, "한국 근대국가형성과 3·1운동", 대동문화연구, (67), pp.403~435 (2009), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- "하의원은 급지 안타", 독립신문, ~ (1898)
- 박찬승, "한국근대정치사상사연구", pp.44~45 (1991), 역사비평사
- "國家論의 槪要 九號續", 西北學會月報, 11 (1909)
- 김효전, "근대한국의 법제와 법학", pp.411~ (2006), 세종출판사
- "近日憲政硏究會에서 憲政要義라", 皇城新聞, ~ (1906)
- "憲政要義第二回", 皇城新聞, ~ (1905)
- 法學少年, "憲法上八大自由에 就하여", 西北學會月報, 14
- 郭漢倬, "憲法", 太極學報, 6, pp.27~ (1907)
- 全永爵, "立法司法及行政의 區別과 其法意義", 太極學報, 8, pp.14~ (1907)[DOI]
- 서희경, "대한민국 건국헌법의 역사적 기원 (1898-1919):만민공동회？3.1운동？대한민국임시정부헌법의‘민주공화’정체 인식을 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 40(5), pp.139~163 (2006), 한국정치학회
- "皇城基督敎靑年會에서", 大韓每日申報, ~ (1906)
- 韓光鎬, "統治의 目的物", 西友, 5, pp.22~ (1907)
- 金振聲, "立憲世界", 大韓興學報, 4, pp.23~ (1909)
- "憲政硏究會의 必要", 大韓每日申報, ~ (1910)
- 薛泰熙, "法律上人의 權義", 大韓自强會月報, 8, pp.19~ (1907)[DOI]
- 金志侃, "靑年立志", 太極學報, 15, pp.8~9 (1907)[DOI]
- 警世生, "人權은 國權의 基礎", 大韓學會月報, 4, pp.18~ (1908)[DOI]
- 梧村 薛泰熙, "法律上人의 權義", 大韓自强會月報, 8, pp.17~ (1907)[DOI]
- 安國善, "政治家", 大韓協會會報, 5, pp.23~ (1908)[DOI]
- "憲法要義第六會", 皇城新聞, ~ (1905)
- 元泳義, "政體槪論", 大韓協會會報, 3, pp.27~ (1908)[DOI]
- "盧梭民約", 皇城新聞, ~ (1908)
- 鮮于, "國家論의 槪要(續)", 西北學會月報, 12, pp.10~ (1909)
- 法律續書人, "國家의 區別", 大同學會月報, 8, pp.21~ (1908)[DOI]
- "皇城基督敎靑年會에서", 皇城新聞, ~ (1906)
- "國家의 槪念(續)", 西北學會月報, 1, pp.16~ (1908)[DOI]
- 유성준, "法學通論", pp.66~ (1905), 박문사
- 元泳義, "政治의 進化(續)", 大韓協會會報, 10, pp.28~ (1909)[DOI]
- "國家의 主動力", 大韓留學生會會報, 2, pp.5~ (1907)[DOI]
- 배경환, "上海 南京지역의 초기(1911-1913) 韓人 망명자들과 신해혁명", 동양사학연구, 67 (1997)
- 김희곤, "辛亥革命과 한국 독립운동", 중국근현대사연구, (53), pp.1~18 (2012), 중국근현대사학회
- 조승래, "공화국과 공화주의", 역사학보, (198), pp.227~254 (2008), 역사학회
- "대한민국임시정부자료집 34 한국독립당 Ⅱ"[URL]
- 김종준, "일진회의 문명화론과 친일활동", pp.70~85 (2010), 신구문화사
- 金東臣, "한말의병전쟁자료집-檄文", pp.128~ (2000), 한국정신문화연구원
- 湖南義所, "韓國獨立運動史 1", pp.679~, 국사편찬위원회
- 沈魯術, "歸順勸誘書에 對한 返書(1908.05.07)", 暴徒編冊, 11, pp.146~ (1908)
- 鍊丹生, "所懷一福으로 普告同胞", 大韓每日申報, ~ (1908)
- "新國家觀念의 變遷", 大韓每日申報, ~ (1909)
- "國民의 權限", 大韓每日申報, ~ (1910)
- "二十世紀新國民(續)", 大韓每日申報, ~ (1910)
- "公法의 必要", 大韓每日申報, ~ (1910)
- 윤대원, "3.1운동과 대한민국임시정부의 재조명 Ⅰ" (2019), 동북아역사재단