본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대한제국기 한일 경찰복 제도 비교

A Comparative Analysis of Police Uniform Systems in Korea and Japan During the Korean Empire Period

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This study examines the degree of Japanese influence on Korean police uniforms during the Korean Empire by comparing them with Japanese uniform systems and assesses their value as cultural heritage. The key findings are as follows: The 1895 police uniform, Korea's first, adopted the Japanese system’s legal format for uniform regulations but differed significantly in design. It also showed distinct features from the contemporary military uniforms. The 1899 revision presented further divergence from Japanese standards in both regulation format and design, reflecting a period of reduced Japanese influence in Korea and aligning more closely with Korean military attire. Subsequent revisions were made in 1900, 1902, 1905, and March 1907. Comparing the 1899 and March 1907 versions shows that while ceremonial hats and topcoats remained mostly unchanged, the ceremonial jacket and cap underwent modifications. The differences between police and military uniforms were primarily in fabric color, emblem shape, and jacket trim and fastening. The 1905 revision saw a shift to red accents, aligning more closely with military attire. By March 1907, the police uniform’s jacket adopted a double-breasted style similar to the military, with differences primarily in color and trim. The October 1907 revision of the police uniform aligned almost entirely with the Japanese system, except for substituting Japanese national symbols with the Korean pear blossom. This study is the first to clarify the complete conformity of the October 1907 version with the Japanese system. The evolution of the highest-ranking police uniforms can be divided into three phases: the 1895 version, which adopted the Japanese regulation format but had distinct designs; the period from 1899 to March 1907, where both regulations and design diverged and became closer to military attire; and the October 1907 version, where both regulation and design conformed to the Japanese system. However, this study focuses only on the highest-ranking hats and jackets of metropolitan police. The October 1907 version does not signify full Japanese control over police uniforms, as lower ranks continued wearing the March 1907 version closer to military attire. Therefore, the 1895 to March 1907 police uniforms, which did not follow Japanese standards, can be seen as a unique cultural heritage of the Korean Empire. While there are many remaining diagrams of police uniforms, few exist for military ones. Conversely, there are few artifacts of police uniforms but several of military ones. This study’s comparison of police and military uniform regulations highlights commonalities and differences, allowing for a complementary understanding of available visual materials. The primary contributions of this study are threefold: identifying three stages in the evolution of police uniforms during the Korean Empire; recognizing the 1895 to March 1907 police uniforms as unique cultural heritage; and proposing ways to bridge gaps in visual materials for police and military uniform studies.

Abstract

This study examines the degree of Japanese influence on Korean police uniforms during the Korean Empire by comparing them with Japanese uniform systems and assesses their value as cultural heritage. The key findings are as follows: The 1895 police uniform, Korea's first, adopted the Japanese system’s legal format for uniform regulations but differed significantly in design. It also showed distinct features from the contemporary military uniforms. The 1899 revision presented further divergence from Japanese standards in both regulation format and design, reflecting a period of reduced Japanese influence in Korea and aligning more closely with Korean military attire. Subsequent revisions were made in 1900, 1902, 1905, and March 1907. Comparing the 1899 and March 1907 versions shows that while ceremonial hats and topcoats remained mostly unchanged, the ceremonial jacket and cap underwent modifications. The differences between police and military uniforms were primarily in fabric color, emblem shape, and jacket trim and fastening. The 1905 revision saw a shift to red accents, aligning more closely with military attire. By March 1907, the police uniform’s jacket adopted a double-breasted style similar to the military, with differences primarily in color and trim. The October 1907 revision of the police uniform aligned almost entirely with the Japanese system, except for substituting Japanese national symbols with the Korean pear blossom. This study is the first to clarify the complete conformity of the October 1907 version with the Japanese system. The evolution of the highest-ranking police uniforms can be divided into three phases: the 1895 version, which adopted the Japanese regulation format but had distinct designs; the period from 1899 to March 1907, where both regulations and design diverged and became closer to military attire; and the October 1907 version, where both regulation and design conformed to the Japanese system. However, this study focuses only on the highest-ranking hats and jackets of metropolitan police. The October 1907 version does not signify full Japanese control over police uniforms, as lower ranks continued wearing the March 1907 version closer to military attire. Therefore, the 1895 to March 1907 police uniforms, which did not follow Japanese standards, can be seen as a unique cultural heritage of the Korean Empire. While there are many remaining diagrams of police uniforms, few exist for military ones. Conversely, there are few artifacts of police uniforms but several of military ones. This study’s comparison of police and military uniform regulations highlights commonalities and differences, allowing for a complementary understanding of available visual materials. The primary contributions of this study are threefold: identifying three stages in the evolution of police uniforms during the Korean Empire; recognizing the 1895 to March 1907 police uniforms as unique cultural heritage; and proposing ways to bridge gaps in visual materials for police and military uniform studies.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 김정민, "구한말 경찰복 연구", 석사, 의류학과, pp.2012
  2. 조우현, "韓國警察服制史", pp.71~120 (2015), 警察廳
  3. 박선희, "대한제국기 의례반차도의 경찰 제복(制服)연구", 석사, pp.2019
  4. "한국 근대 사료 DB 조선·대한제국 관보" (2024)[URL]
  5. "경시청복제(須原鐵二, 1877 『東京警視本署達全書明治七年)" (2024)[URL]
  6. "(일본)국립국회도서관 디지털 컬렉션, 관보" (2024)[URL]
  7. 마쓰다 토시히코, "일본의 조선 식민지 지배와 경찰", pp.45~ (2020), 경인문화사
  8. 伊藤俊介, "近代朝鮮の甲午改革と王権·警察·民衆", pp.76~85 (2022), 有志舎
  9. 伊藤俊介, "갑오개혁기 경찰기구 연구", 박사, 한국사, pp.2010
  10. 신창우, "식민지 조선의 경찰과 민중세계 1894-1919 : ‘근대’와 ‘전통’을 둘러싼 정치문화", pp.123~ (2019), 선인
  11. "일본 외교문서 디지털 아카이브 제27권 제2책" (1894)[URL]
  12. "議奏, 奎17705-v.6" (2024)[URL]
  13. "1890(명치23)년 칙령 제123호, 警察官及消防官服制改正 御署名原本" (1890)[URL]
  14. 손영상, "갑오개혁 이후 근대적(近代的)경찰(警察)제도(制度)의 정립과 운영", 한국사론, 53, pp.351~352 (2007)
  15. "警務使, 警務官, 總巡의 禮帽와 禮裝을 新製하고 常着帽裝을 改正하는 건에 대한 請議書, 『奏本』 , 奎17703-v.28"[URL]
  16. 차선혜, "대한제국기 경찰제도의 변화와 성격", 역사와 현실, 19, pp.86~87 (1996)
  17. 이윤정, "한국경찰사 근현대편", pp.60~ (2015), 소명출판
  18. 이경미, "대한제국기 육군 복장 법령의 시기별 변화", 한국문화, 83, pp.484~485 (2018)
  19. "1897(건양2)년 5월15일 조칙, ‘陸軍將卒服裝製式’, 관보 제639호" (1897)[URL]
  20. "1900(광무4)년 7월 2일 조칙, ‘開國五百六年五月十五日特下陸軍服裝規則中大禮衣常衣光武三年一月十五日改正陸軍大禮肩章製式如左改定’, 관보 제1624호" (1900)[URL]
  21. "警務官以下의 禮裝常裝費와 夏服의 制章을 개정하는 건에 대한 請議書, 『奏本』 , 奎17703-v.93"[URL]
  22. "警務廳官吏의 禮裝等을 改正하는 勅令案에 대한 請議書, 『奏本』 , 奎17703-v.112" (2024)[URL]
  23. 김성혜, "육군박물관 소장 군사복식", pp.61~ (2012), 육군사관학교 육군박물관
  24. "1906(광무10)년 2월 15일, 정오, 『관보』 제3377호" (1906)[URL]
  25. "1870(명치3)년 12월 22일, 태정관 포고, 陸軍徽章, 明治三年法令全書" (1870)[URL]
  26. "1886(명치19)년 7월 6일, 陸軍將校服制, 官報 호외" (1886)[URL]
  27. "1886년 칙령 제48호, 陸軍将校服制改正 御署名原本" (1886)[URL]
  28. 한성민, "1907년 체제 성립과정에서 일본의 한국정책과 한국사회의 대응", 일본역사연구, 49, pp.79~ (2019)
  29. "七月二十四日任警視副監敍勅任官三等前警務使具然壽, 『관보』 제3839호" (1907)[URL]
  30. 原昌通, "幕末明治大正史: 波瀾重畳 水之巻", pp.1932~1933 (1921), 松本書院
  31. "(일본)국립국회도서관 디지털 컬렉션"[URL]
  32. "明治大正連續記念寫眞帖: 皇室軍事天変人事" (1922)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)