본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

樊巖 蔡濟恭과 교류한 인물로 본 18세기 고위관료의 社會關係網

Social Network of High-ranking Government Officials in the 18th Century - Focusing on the Case of Chae Jegong -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This study aims to analyze and categorize people who had social exchanges throughout their lives in the 18th century Joseon, and to present a methodology to understand the social network of ruling class of the Joseon Dynasty. I extracted the people who Chae Jegong(蔡濟恭) had interacted with through the contents of his anthology, Beonamjip(樊巖集) and reviewed how he had a relationship with them. His social network was largely composed of ‘kinship’, ‘literary friends’, and ‘bureaucrats’. First, ‘relatives’ were the primary factors that formed social networks, and were very important relationships that formed the same identity in pre-modern times. Second, ‘literary friends’ was an element that formed an extended social network outside of ‘relatives’ as people who interacted in the private sector. Third, ‘bureaucrats’ were people who had exchanges in the public space of the government, including politically hostile people, but they often lived in Seoul, so there was less diversity in the region. Meanwhile, Chae’s predecessors in Beonamjip show his political or academic origins well. There were also a number of people with a significantly lower social class, including the middle class, common people, and monks. It can be expected that the horizon of social network analysis can be further expanded by expanding the subject of research to past people and lower classes. This study also focused on how political color and residence influenced social network. In the private sphere, Chae mainly interacted with the politically and geographically homogeneous class, but he was also interacting with Yeongnam(嶺南) scholars, which shared academic origins. In the public sphere, there was a clear tendency to interact with people of various political colors, but it was characterized by being limited to the capital on a regional basis.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and categorize people who had social exchanges throughout their lives in the 18th century Joseon, and to present a methodology to understand the social network of ruling class of the Joseon Dynasty. I extracted the people who Chae Jegong(蔡濟恭) had interacted with through the contents of his anthology, Beonamjip(樊巖集) and reviewed how he had a relationship with them. His social network was largely composed of ‘kinship’, ‘literary friends’, and ‘bureaucrats’. First, ‘relatives’ were the primary factors that formed social networks, and were very important relationships that formed the same identity in pre-modern times. Second, ‘literary friends’ was an element that formed an extended social network outside of ‘relatives’ as people who interacted in the private sector. Third, ‘bureaucrats’ were people who had exchanges in the public space of the government, including politically hostile people, but they often lived in Seoul, so there was less diversity in the region. Meanwhile, Chae’s predecessors in Beonamjip show his political or academic origins well. There were also a number of people with a significantly lower social class, including the middle class, common people, and monks. It can be expected that the horizon of social network analysis can be further expanded by expanding the subject of research to past people and lower classes. This study also focused on how political color and residence influenced social network. In the private sphere, Chae mainly interacted with the politically and geographically homogeneous class, but he was also interacting with Yeongnam(嶺南) scholars, which shared academic origins. In the public sphere, there was a clear tendency to interact with people of various political colors, but it was characterized by being limited to the capital on a regional basis.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 趙成山, "樊巖 蔡濟恭의 先代家系와 學問淵源", 韓國人物史硏究, 5 (2006)
  2. 백승호, "樊巖 蔡濟恭의 文字政治", 진단학보, (101), pp.359~390 (2006), 진단학회
  3. 최우혁, "정조~순조대 近畿南人의 분화와 정치 명분 확립", 조선시대사학보, (90), pp.273~308 (2019), 조선시대사학회[DOI]
  4. 김문식, "정조시대 명재상: 번암 채제공" (2016), 수원화성박물관
  5. 이상국, "한국사 연구와 디지털역사학 연구방법론 -양적분석을 중심으로-", 한국사연구, (197), pp.1~27 (2022), 한국사연구회[DOI]
  6. 백광열, "조선후기 한 지방양반의 친족연결망 -海南尹氏 尹爾厚 친족의 사례 검토-", 태동고전연구, 39, pp.41~88 (2017), 태동고전연구소
  7. 백광렬, "조선후기 양반지배네트워크의 성격과 구조변동: 상층양반의 친족연결망을 중심으로", 박사, 사회학과, pp.2017
  8. 백광열, "『文化柳氏嘉靖譜』(1565) 등장 관료의 친족연결망을 통해 보는 조선 전기 사림파의 사회적 배경: 기묘사림을 중심으로", 규장각, (58), pp.391~437 (2021), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  9. 韓相祐, "朝鮮後期 兩班層의 親族 네트워크", 박사, 동아시아학과, pp.2014
  10. 나영훈, "조선후기 관상감(觀象監) 관원의 친족 네트워크와 결속", 한국학, 42(3), pp.45~86 (2019), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
  11. 나영훈, "조선 후기 의과 입격자의 친족 네트워크와 결속", 대동문화연구, (110), pp.231~270 (2020), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  12. 나영훈, "조선후기 율과입격자의 친족 네트워크과 결속", 국학연구, (45), pp.115~152 (2021), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
  13. 전경목, "『미암일기』를 통해 본 16세기 양반관료의 사회관계망 연구-해배 직후 시기를 중심으로-", 조선시대사학보, (73), pp.71~113 (2015), 조선시대사학회
  14. 김윤정, "李穀의 사회관계망과 在元 고려인 사회 -<稼亭集>에 대한 분석을 중심으로-", 학림, 44, pp.39~76 (2019), 연세사학연구회[DOI]
  15. "樊巖集", ~
  16. 윤민경, "조선 후기 ‘世嫌譜’ 제작과 世嫌의 실제", 조선시대사학보, (84), pp.223~263 (2018), 조선시대사학회[DOI]
  17. 車長燮, "朝鮮後期 閥閱硏究" (1997), 일조각
  18. 前間恭作, "名世譜" (1973), 亞細亞文化社
  19. "南譜" (1987), 驪江出版社
  20. "縉譜", 청구기호 奎12418, ~
  21. "南譜" (2016), 학자원
  22. "南譜", 청구기호 古4657-5A, ~
  23. "南譜" (1984), 한국천주교회200주년기념사업위원회 교회역사자료 편찬부
  24. 권기석, "조선 정조(正祖)의 족보 활용과 탕평정치 - 『양문양공외예보(梁文襄公外裔譜)』와 『모당내외손록(慕堂內外孫錄)』을 중심으로 -", 한국사연구, (186), pp.299~362 (2019), 한국사연구회[DOI]
  25. 崔在錫, "韓國家族制度史硏究", pp.287~290 (1983), 一志社
  26. 이종서, "고려~조선전기 친족관계 ―'족(族)'을 중심으로―", 역사비평, (64), pp.261~280 (2003), 역사문제연구소
  27. 이종서, "조선 전기와 후기의 혈연의식 비교-‘族’ 관련 용어와 권리의무관계를 중심으로", 한국문화, (58), pp.89~110 (2012), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  28. 이종서, "14~16세기 한국의 친족용어와 일상 친족관계", 박사, 국사학, pp.2003
  29. 최성환, "영·정조대 채제공의 정치 생애와 정치 의리", 한국실학연구, (33), pp.187~228 (2017), 한국실학학회
  30. 고수연, "『戊申倡義錄』을 통해 본 18, 19세기 嶺南 南人의 정치동향", 역사와 담론, (65), pp.311~350 (2013), 호서사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)