본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중등 과학교사의 수업 실행 전문성의 발달과 학습 틀

A Framework for Progression in the Professional Development and Learning of Secondary Science Teachers' Teaching Practice

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구는 중등 과학교사의 수업 실행 전문성의 발달과 학습 틀을 개발하고 적용하는데 그 목적이 있다. 우필희의 틀(2010)을 수정, 보완하여 중등 과학교사의 수업실행 전문성의 발달과 학습 틀을 개발하였다. 과학수업 전문성 6개 요소, 36개 관점에 대한 발달과 학습 수준을 다섯 수준의 준거로 구성되어 있으며. 발달 틀의 내용타당도는 96.4%, 신뢰도는 .96이다. 학습 틀의 내용타당도는 96.0%, 신뢰도는 .95이었다. 중등 과학교사 203명의 수업 실행 전문성의 발달 수준과 학습 수준은 2. 21과 2.95이었으며, 대부분의 교사는 전문성의 발달수준과 학습 수준 모두 4 수준 미만의 낮은 상태에 있었다. 발달 수준은 교사의 성별, 경력, 학교, 전공과목, 학력에 따라 모두 유의미한 차이가 있었지만, 학습 수준은 경력을 제외하고 모두 유의미한 차이가 있었다. 발달 수준과 학습 수준은 상관관계가 있었다. 이상과 같이 개발된 틀은 중등 과학교사 개인이나 학교 단위에서 교사의 수업 실행 전문성의 발달 수준과 학습 수준을 파악하고 그 수준을 향상시키기 위한 방법의 결정이나 계획의 수립 및 그 개선을 평가하는데 활용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and apply a framework for progression in the professional development and learning of secondary science teachers' teaching practice. The progression in the professional development was modified Pilhee Woo's framework(2010), and in the learning was developed by the researchers. The former included 6 elements and 36 aspects. The progression of each aspect was composed of five level criteria. The content validity is 96.4% and the reliability is .96. The latter was composed of another five level criteria. The content validity is 96.0% and the reliability is .95. Internet-online test and the questionnaire were administered to 203 secondary science teachers who were selected by convenience sampling. The mean level of the progression in the professional development and learning were 2.21 and 2.95. ANOVA, t-test and correlation analysis were conducted to compare differences by the characteristics of teachers. The level of the progression in the professional development and learning was significant difference according to almost all of teachers' characteristics. The level of the progression in the professional development was significantly correlated with the level of the progression in the learning.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 곽영순, "과학과 교과교육학 지식 유형별 교사 전문성의 특징 연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), pp.592~602 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
  2. 김성원, "중등 과학교사의 전문성 향상을 위한 자기평가 도구의 개발과 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(7), pp.736~745 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
  3. 김희경, "과학 교사의 전문성 계발 프로그램의 조건과 모형", 초등과학교육, 26(3), pp.295~308 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
  4. 박성혜, "교사들의 과학 교과교육학 지식 측정도구 개발", 한국교원교육연구, 20(1), pp.105~134 (2003), 한국교원교육학회
  5. 우필희, "초등교사의 과학수업 실행 전문성 개발의 발달과 학습 틀", 석사, pp.2010
  6. 윤근영, "초등교사의 발달단계와 수업전문성과의 관계", 초등교육학연구, 14(2), pp.59~76 (2007)
  7. 이난숙, "교사의 직무발달 특성에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1991
  8. 이윤식, "장학론" (1999), 교육과학사
  9. 임청환, "과학 교과교육학 지식의 본질과 발달", 한국지구과학학회지, 24(4), pp.235~249 (2003)
  10. 정연수, "중등 과학교사를 위한 자기 평가 세부문항의 개발과 적용", 석사, pp.2006
  11. 진영은, "수업 전문성 재개념화 연구 동향 및 과제", 열린교육연구, 17(2), pp.47~71 (2009), 한국열린교육학회
  12. 수업평가 매뉴얼-과학과수업평가 기준, "한국교육과정평가원", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구자료ORM 2006-24-7 (2006)
  13. AAMT, "National Professional Standards for accomplished primary teaching 1st draft" (2009), The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc
  14. American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Benchmarks for Science Literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
  15. Anderson, M. F., "Provision of professional development & training to all employees within government schools in Queensland", 박사, pp.2000
  16. Anderson, R. D., "Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, pp.1~12 (2002)
  17. Appleton, K., "Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. in: Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice", pp.31~54 (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum in association with the Association for Science Teacher Education
  18. Appleton, K., "Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers’practices", International Journal of Science Education, 21, pp.155~168 (1999)
  19. Bell, B., "Teacher development: A model from science education" (1996), Falmer Press
  20. Bell, J., "The evolution of pedagogical content knowledge in prospective secondary physics teachers", Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (1998)
  21. Chan, K., "A case study of physicists' conceptions about the theory of evolution", Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (1998)
  22. Cochran, K. F., "Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation", Journal of Teacher Education, 44, pp.263~272 (1993)
  23. Cunningham, J., "Building education professional", Leadership, 31(4), pp.34~38 (2002)
  24. Gess-Newsome, J., "Pedagogical content knowledge: An introdution and orientation. in: Examining pedagogical content knowledge", pp.3~17 (1999), Kluwer
  25. Grossman, P. L., "The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education" (1990), Teachers College Press
  26. Loughran, J., "Science cases in action: Developing an understanding of science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the America Education Research Association (2000)
  27. Magnusson, S., "Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. in: Examining pedagogical content knowledge", pp.95~132 (1999), Kluwer
  28. "National Professional Standards for Teachers"[URL]
  29. Mellado, V., "A framework for learning to teach science in initial primary teacher education", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9, pp.195~219 (1998)
  30. Mills, G. E., "Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher. (3rd ed.)", pp.2007, Merrill
  31. Monsour, F., "Mentoring to develop and retain new teachers", Kappa Delta Pi Record, 39(3), pp.134~136 (2003)
  32. Morine-Dershimer, G., "The complex nature and sources of teachers' pedagogical knowledge. in: Examining pedagogical content knowledge", pp.21~50 (1999), Kluwer
  33. National Research Council, "National science education standard" (1996), National Academy Press
  34. "National Professional Standards for Highly Accomplished Teachers of Science"[URL]
  35. ". Arlington: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards"[URL]
  36. OECD, "Teacher Matter: Attracting" (2005), developing and retaining effective teachers
  37. Peers, C. E.., "Supports and concerns for teacher professional growth during the implementation of a science curriculum innovation", Research in Science Education, 33(1), pp.89~110 (2003)
  38. SEF, "Framework for progression in the professional development of science teachers in secondary schools", Science Education Forum (2006)
  39. Shulman, L, S., "Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching", Educational Research, 15(2), pp.4~14 (1986)
  40. Shulman, L, S., "Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of new reform", Harvard Educational Review, 57, pp.1~22 (1987)
  41. van Driel, J. H., "Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, pp.673~695 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)