Engineering Design: A Facilitator for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics [STEM] Education
2
조회
0
다운로드
35
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to investigate the key common topics identified and discussed in relevant literature associated with the integrative efforts among STEM disciplines. The key methodology and pedagogy were examined and the significant benefits of using the design method for STEM education were discussed. Meta-analysis was employed and qualitative approach was mainly used to synthesize the major findings and conclusions of the 33 empirical studies. The findings of this meta-analysis revealed that the types and names describing the design methods used the various terms, but the key features have reflected the similar pedagogical benefits and key characteristics. The engineering design is an effective strategic methodology and pedagogy for STEM education. In addition, the design methods show the key benefits including (1) to improve academic achievement, (2) to promote students’ affective gains, (3) to facilitate collaborative learning, and (4) to explore STEM related careers and jobs. The collaborative works among STEM professions are needed to promote the benefits of using design methods for integrating STEM subjects
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the key common topics identified and discussed in relevant literature associated with the integrative efforts among STEM disciplines. The key methodology and pedagogy were examined and the significant benefits of using the design method for STEM education were discussed. Meta-analysis was employed and qualitative approach was mainly used to synthesize the major findings and conclusions of the 33 empirical studies. The findings of this meta-analysis revealed that the types and names describing the design methods used the various terms, but the key features have reflected the similar pedagogical benefits and key characteristics. The engineering design is an effective strategic methodology and pedagogy for STEM education. In addition, the design methods show the key benefits including (1) to improve academic achievement, (2) to promote students’ affective gains, (3) to facilitate collaborative learning, and (4) to explore STEM related careers and jobs. The collaborative works among STEM professions are needed to promote the benefits of using design methods for integrating STEM subjects
참고문헌 (50)
- "Criteria for accrediting engineering programs"[URL]
- American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Benchmarks for scientific literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
- Apedoe, X, "Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating", cooling unit, 2008, pp.17, 454~465
- Bers, M, "Teaching partnerships: Early childhood and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), pp.59~73 (2005)
- Bisogno, J, "Virtual bridge design", pp.26~33 (2008), Sciencescope
- Burghardt, M. D, "Informed design: A contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology", Technology Teacher, 64(1), pp.6~8 (2004)
- Cajas, F, "The science", technology interaction: Implications for science literacy, 2001, pp.38(7), 715~729
- Childress, V. W, "Does Integrating Technology, Science, and Mathematics Improve Technological Problem Solving? A Quasi-Experiment", Journal of Technology Education, 8(1), pp.16~26 (1996)
- Cunningham, C., "Integrating engineering in middle and high school classrooms", International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), pp.3~8 (2007)
- De Romero, N., "Design challenges ELL-ementary", pp.34~37 (2006), Science Children
- Doppelt, Y, "Engagement and achievement: A case study of design based learning in a science context", Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), pp.22~39 (2008)
- Doppelt, Y, "Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), pp.55~65 (2009)
- Drake, S., "Meeting standards through integrated curriculum", ASDC, ~ (2004)
- Fitzgerald, M, "Cereal box design: An interdisciplinary graphics activity", Techdirection, 22~25 (2004)
- Fortus, D., "Design based science and real-world problem solving", International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), pp.855~879 (2005)
- Frazier, W, "Motor mania: Revving up for technological design", pp.5~12 (2008), The Technology Teacher
- Hatch, G, "Integrating physical education, math, and physics", Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 75(1), pp.42~50 (2004)
- Hutchinson, J, "British technology education: An American view", The Technology Teacher, 46(3), pp.13~18 (1986)
- Hutchinson,P, "Children designing and engineering: Contextual learning units in primary design and technology", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), pp.122~145 (2002)
- International Technology Education Association, "Technology for all Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology", International Technology Education Association, ~ (1996)
- International Technology Education Association, "Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology", International Technology Education Association, ~ (2000)
- International Technology Education Association, "Advancing excellence in technological literacy: Students assessment, professional development, program standards", International Technology Education Association, ~ (2003)
- Kolodner, L, "Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), pp.9~40 (2002)
- Kolodner, J, "Problem based learning meet case-based reasoning in the middle school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), pp.495~547 (2003)
- LaPorte, J. E., "Integrating technology, science, and mathematics education. In Foundations of technology education: Forty-fourth yearbook of the council on Technology Teacher Education", Glencoe, 179~219 (1995)
- Leonard, M. J, "Toward epistemologically authentic engineering design activities in the Science Classroom", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, ~ (2004)
- Lewis, T, "Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), pp.255~281 (2006)
- McGinnis, J., "Perceptions of making connections between science and mathematics in a science methods course", Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18(2), pp.13~30 (2006)
- Merrill, C, "Integrated technology, mathematics and science education: A quasiexperiment", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 38(3), pp.45~61 (2001)
- Minogue, J., "Paper tower: Building students’understanding of technological design", Science Scope, 18~20 (2006)
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Principles and standards for school mathematics", National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, ~ (2000)
- Norton, S. J, "The use of design practice to teach mathematics and science", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, pp.19~44 (2007)
- Parkinson, E, "Practical modeling and hypothesis testing in primary design and technology education", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(3), pp.233~251 (2007)
- Perrenet, J, "From mathematical modeling to design based learning: A bridge too far?", International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 33(2), pp.187~197 (2002)
- Petrina, S, "The politics of research in technology education: A critical content and discourse analysis of the Journal of Technology Education", Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), pp.27~57 (1998)
- Piskow, T, "Straw tower competition builds student interest", Techdirections, 26~27 (2008)
- Putambekar, S., "Toward implementing distributed scaffolding helping students learn science from design", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), pp.185~217 (2005)
- Roth, W, "Learning science through technological design", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), pp.768~790 (2001)
- Rowell, P. W, "Characterization of technology within an elementary science program", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), pp.37~56 (1999)
- Sanders, M, "A rational for new approaches to STEM education and STEM education graduate programs", Paper presented at the 93rd Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference (2006)
- Satchwell, R, "Designing and implementing an integrated mathematics, science, and technology curriculum for the middle school", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), pp.41~66 (2002)
- Starkweather, K. N, "Testimony pertaining to the science framework for the 2009 national assessment of education progress", Technology Teacher, 65(4), pp.36~37 (2005)
- Venville, G. Rennie, L, "Decision making and sources of knowledge: How students tackle integrated tasks in science, technology, and mathematics", Research in Science Education, 34, pp.115~125 (2004)
- "STEM education graduate degree options (STEM ed options)"[URL]
- Wender, I, "Relation of technology, science, self-concept, interest, and gender", Journal of Technology Studies, 30(3), pp.43~51 (2004)
- West, S, "Integrated Science and mathematics: Doable? Desirable?", The Texas Science Teacher, 17~20 (2003)
- Wicklein, R. C, "Critical issues and problems in technology education", The Technology Teacher, 64(4), pp.6~9 (2005)
- Wicklein, R. C, "Five good reasons for engineering design as the focus for technology education", The Technology Teacher, 25~29 (2006)
- Wright, R. T, "British design and technology: A critical analysis", Journal of Technology Education, 4(2), pp.60~70 (1993)
- Zubrowski, B, "Integrating science into design technology projects: Using a standard model in the design process", Journal of Technology Education, 13, pp.47~65 (2002)