홍익과 후천상생의 맥락화용
A Study on the Contextual Pragmatics between Humanitarian and Posterior Mutual-Living
10
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to find contextual pragmatics between humanitarian and mutual-living. In Dangun myth, we can find the motive of Being good broadly for the world. As for mutual-living, Jeung-San (1871-1909) define Won Han(resentment and regret) as social and personal insufficiency and Won(寃) as group’s revenge emotion. Jeung-San believed that the root of these dissatisfaction of Won can be solved mutual living’s mind and practice according to Three World’s Heaven Earth Public Affairs. Jeong-San(1900-1962), the second Master of Won-Buddhism established the ideal civilized society that is formed on the basis of Triple Identity ethics. The global village causes more problems than any other period and jeopardizes human survival. Among many problems such as ecocide, religious violence, aggressive warfare and terrorism, nuclear weapons and destruction of humanity, Triple Identity ethics is oriented to solve these various difficulties and antagonism. This paper is to find out mutual living’s structure and practice among Jeung-San Master and Jeong San Master’s Triple Identity ethics with You Yuong-Mo(1890-1981)’s Mutual Redemption. Firstly, the motive of Finding God’s nature in man. The principle of public communication and cooperation among vulgar being dies and new being that can communicate with God. Secondly, the motive of Ruling the world with reason. In Dangun myth, it can change the energy of the world into reason to create a harmonious culture keeping human being esteem, and public communication as human dignity. Thirdly, the motive of Being good broadly for the world can create the new environment of peace and co-existing living mode beyond ideological conflicts and different business. To help all the people for the mutual living, the mutual harmonious environment is very important beyond ideologies, nations, and global citizenship should be essential in global citizenship. In conclusion, mutual living is trans-versal values that require global responsibility for prosperity and happiness and community of rights and practice of cosmopolitans. Solution-Won Mutual Harmony and Triple Identity Mutual Harmony with Mutual Redemption can create common goodness as public common ethics of humanitarian spirit.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to find contextual pragmatics between humanitarian and mutual-living. In Dangun myth, we can find the motive of Being good broadly for the world. As for mutual-living, Jeung-San (1871-1909) define Won Han(resentment and regret) as social and personal insufficiency and Won(寃) as group’s revenge emotion. Jeung-San believed that the root of these dissatisfaction of Won can be solved mutual living’s mind and practice according to Three World’s Heaven Earth Public Affairs. Jeong-San(1900-1962), the second Master of Won-Buddhism established the ideal civilized society that is formed on the basis of Triple Identity ethics. The global village causes more problems than any other period and jeopardizes human survival. Among many problems such as ecocide, religious violence, aggressive warfare and terrorism, nuclear weapons and destruction of humanity, Triple Identity ethics is oriented to solve these various difficulties and antagonism. This paper is to find out mutual living’s structure and practice among Jeung-San Master and Jeong San Master’s Triple Identity ethics with You Yuong-Mo(1890-1981)’s Mutual Redemption. Firstly, the motive of Finding God’s nature in man. The principle of public communication and cooperation among vulgar being dies and new being that can communicate with God. Secondly, the motive of Ruling the world with reason. In Dangun myth, it can change the energy of the world into reason to create a harmonious culture keeping human being esteem, and public communication as human dignity. Thirdly, the motive of Being good broadly for the world can create the new environment of peace and co-existing living mode beyond ideological conflicts and different business. To help all the people for the mutual living, the mutual harmonious environment is very important beyond ideologies, nations, and global citizenship should be essential in global citizenship. In conclusion, mutual living is trans-versal values that require global responsibility for prosperity and happiness and community of rights and practice of cosmopolitans. Solution-Won Mutual Harmony and Triple Identity Mutual Harmony with Mutual Redemption can create common goodness as public common ethics of humanitarian spirit.
