도시지하공간 식물재배시설 조성에 대한 지불의사액 추정: 메트로팜 사례를 중심으로
WTP Estimation of Constructing Horticultural Facilities in Urban Underground Space: In the Case of Metro-Farm
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The underground and subway space, which is one of main public transportations and representative underground area in Seoul, causing interior air pollution and environmental degradation, could threaten citizens' health and aesthetic. The purpose of the research is to estimate willingness to pay for horticultural metro-farm facilities and air quality improvement by using onsite DBCV in metropolitan Seoul. The in-person 539 survey results show that 'aesthetic·emotional stability' gets the highest mark, followed by 'air quality improvement', 'scenery', 'environmental awareness', etc. The WTP estimated is about ￦2,382 per household and the benefit expanded of metro-farm introduction is calculated to be ￦234.1 billion (WTP ￦2,381.5/3years/1st× 4,117,000 households×response rate 79.6%), and then the following net benefit is ￦148.5 billion assuming that total cost is ￦85.7 billion (ten metro-farm facilities for each one of 298 stations in Seoul), and BC ratio is about 2.73. Hence, the result shows that introduction of horticultural metro-farm facilities to improve the underground environment in Seoul will produce a variety of beneficiary effects and their distribution and expansion is expectable.
Abstract
The underground and subway space, which is one of main public transportations and representative underground area in Seoul, causing interior air pollution and environmental degradation, could threaten citizens' health and aesthetic. The purpose of the research is to estimate willingness to pay for horticultural metro-farm facilities and air quality improvement by using onsite DBCV in metropolitan Seoul. The in-person 539 survey results show that 'aesthetic·emotional stability' gets the highest mark, followed by 'air quality improvement', 'scenery', 'environmental awareness', etc. The WTP estimated is about ￦2,382 per household and the benefit expanded of metro-farm introduction is calculated to be ￦234.1 billion (WTP ￦2,381.5/3years/1st× 4,117,000 households×response rate 79.6%), and then the following net benefit is ￦148.5 billion assuming that total cost is ￦85.7 billion (ten metro-farm facilities for each one of 298 stations in Seoul), and BC ratio is about 2.73. Hence, the result shows that introduction of horticultural metro-farm facilities to improve the underground environment in Seoul will produce a variety of beneficiary effects and their distribution and expansion is expectable.
참고문헌 (33)
- 권오상, "환경경제학" (2007), 박영사
- 경기도지역 대기오염의 사회적 비용 추정 및 적정 수준 달성방안, "경기개발연구원", ~ (2003)
- 김수봉, "식물을 이용한 지하공간의 친환경적 활용과 대구시 녹지환경의 개선에 대하여", 환경과학논집, 6(1), pp.41~51 (2001)
- 문윤석, "도시 녹지경관의 경제적 가치평가 - 독립공원을 중심으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 37(2), pp.70~77 (2009), 한국조경학회
- 박종훈, "동대문지역의 보행환경개선을 위한 지하공간 개발에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회 학술대회발표논문집, 26(1), pp.435~440 (2006)
- 박용치, "비시장채의가치평가: 공기오염의 건강영향 가치평가", 한국사회와 행정연구, 13(3), pp.283~300 (2002)
- 이은수, "가상적 가치평가모형을 이용한 목적지 관광활동의 지불의사 추정", 관광학연구, 29(3), pp.251~269 (2005), 한국관광학회
- 지하 입체도시 조성 마스터플랜 용역계획, "서울시", ~ (2009)
- 임혜진, "서울광장 조성에 대한 서울시민의 지불의사액 추정", 서울도시연구, 6(2), pp.39~56 (2005), 서울연구원
- 전철현, "수질 악화로 인한 후생변화의 추정", 환경정책연구, 9(2), pp.135~155 (2010), 한국환경정책·평가연구원
- "통계청 국가통계포털" (2010)[URL]
- DMZ일원 주요자원의 보전가치 추정 연구, "최성록", 강원발전연구원·경기개발연구원, ~ (2009)
- 지하철 공기질 개선대책, "환경부", ~ (2008)
- 환경부, "도시 지하공간 생태경관지침", ~ (2010)
- 홍종호, "다중이용시설 실내공기질 개선의 경제적 가치 추정: 서울시 지하역사를 중심으로", 한국경제연구, 17(3), pp.169~198 (2006), 한국경제연구학회
- Alberini, A., "Handbook on Contingent Valuation" (2006), Edward Elg
- Arrow, K., "Report of NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation", Federal Register, 58, pp.4601~4614 (1993)
- Bateman, I. J., "Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques(A Manual)" (2002), Edward Elgar
- Carson, R. T., "The Stated Preference Approach to Environmental Valuation(Volume 1)" (2007), ASHGATE
- Greene, W. H., "Econometric Analysis 7th ed" (2012), Pearson
- Haab, T. C., "Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources(The Econometrics of Non-market Valuation)" (2003), Edward Elgar
- Hanemann, W. M., "Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, pp.332~341 (1984)
- Hanemann, W. M., "Some Issues Continuous-and Discrete-Response Contingent Valuation Studies", Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 14(1), pp.5~13 (1985)
- Hanemann, W. M., "Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses Data: Reply", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, pp.1057~1061 (1989)
- The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response CV Data, "Hanemann, W. M.", University of California, ~, pp.Working Paper No. 798 (1998)
- Hill R. Carter, "Principles of Econometrics. 4th ed" (2011), Wiley
- Louviere, J. J., "Stated Choice Methods(Analysis and Applications)" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Powe, N. A., "Redesigning Environmental Valuation(Mixing Methods within Stated Preference Techniques)" (2007), Edward Elgar
- 엄영숙, "Preference Data for Environmental Valuation" (2011), Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
- Mascolell, A., "Microeconomic Theory" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Train, K. E., "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Wooldridge, J. M., "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data" (2001), The MIT Press
- Wooldridge, J. M., "Introductory Econometrics" (2006), Thomson South-Western