본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

코경유눈물주머니코안연결술 시 calcium alginate와 polyurethane foam의 효과 비교

Comparison of Calcium Alginate and Polyurethane Foam Used as Nasal Packings after Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류안과학

초록

목적: 코경유눈물주머니코안연결술 시 비강 내에 삽입하는 흡수성 충전 물질인 calcium alginate (Algi-packⓇ)와 polyurethane foam (NasoporeⓇ)의 수술 후 결과에 미치는 영향을 비교하고자 하였다. 대상과 방법: 2008년 1월부터 2016년 7월까지 본원에서 원발코눈물관막힘으로 한 명의 집도의에 의해 코경유눈물주머니코안연결술을 받은 환자 중 조건에 부합하는 총 128안을 후향적으로 조사하였다. Algi-packⓇ 사용군에는 42안이 포함되었고, NasoporeⓇ 사용군에는 86안이 포함되었다. 술 후 2일째 통증의 정도, 1주일 내 재출혈 여부, 3개월 후 해부학적 및 기능적 성공률, 3개월 후 비강 내 유착, 수술 부위 육아종, 막형성 등을 평가하여 Algi-packⓇ 사용군과 NasoporeⓇ 사용군을 비교하였다. 결과: 술 후 통증의 정도 및 재출혈 빈도는 두 군 간에 유의한 차이가 없었으며(통증: 73.8% vs. 83.7%, p=0.38; 재출혈: 4.8% vs. 5.8%, p=0.058). 3개월 후 수술 부위 육아종, 비강 내 유착 및 막형성 빈도에는 유의한 차이가 없었다(육아종: 33.3% vs. 29.1%, p=0.62; 비강 내 유착: 1.2% vs. 4.8%, p=0.21; 막형성: 19.0% vs. 12.8%, p=0.35). 3개월째 해부학적 및 기능적 성공률 또한 두 군 간의 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(해부학적: 100% vs. 97.7%, p=0.32; 기능적: 100% vs. 95.3%, p=0.16). 결론: 코경유눈물주머니코안연결술 후 충전 물질로 사용하는 Algi-packⓇ과 NasoporeⓇ는 수술 부위 지혈 효과에 있어서 동등한 효과를 보이며 수술 결과에 있어서도 유의한 차이를 보이지 않는다.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of calcium alginate (Algi-packⓇ)and polyurethane foam (NasoporeⓇ), two types of absorbable packing used for nasal packing after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 128 eyes of patients who underwent endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy from January 2008 to July 2016. Algi-packⓇ was used to pack 42 eyes and NasoporeⓇ in 86 eyes. We compared the two groups in terms of pain on postoperative day 2; the re-bleeding frequency within 1 week; anatomical and functional success rates 3 months after surgery; and the frequencies of postoperative complications including synechiae, granulomas, and membrane formation at 3 months postoperatively. Results: There was no significant difference between the Algi-packⓇ and NasoporeⓇ groups in terms of postoperative pain or re-bleeding rate (pain: 73.8% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.38; re-bleeding: 4.8% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.058). There was no significant between- group difference in terms of the formation of synechiae, granulomas, or membranes to 3 months postoperatively (granulomas: 33.3% vs. 29.1%, p = 0.62; synechiae: 1.2% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.21; membranes: 19.0% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.35). The functional and anatomical success rates evaluated 3 months after surgery also did not differ significantly between the two groups (anatomical success: 100% vs. 97.7%, p = 0.32; functional success: 100% vs. 95.3%, p = 0.16). Conclusions: Algi-packⓇ and NasoporeⓇ equivalently suppressed bleeding after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and did not differentially affect the surgical success rate or the frequency of postoperative complications.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Moore WM, "Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical and holmium laser", Ophthalmology, 109, pp.1575~1582 (2002)[DOI]
  2. Rosen N, "Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tubes: evaluation of 253 cases", Ophthalmic Surg, 20, pp.115~119 (1989)
  3. Fayet B, "Complications of standardized endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with unciformectomy", Ophthalmology, 111, pp.837~845 (2004)[DOI]
  4. Anderson RL, "Gelfoam packing after dacryocystorhinostomy", Arch Ophthalmol, 95, pp.520~ (1977)
  5. Durrani OM, "Use of a novel topical hemostatic sealant in lacrimal surgery: a prospective, comparative study", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 23, pp.25~27 (2007)[DOI]
  6. Konuk O, "Unsuccessful lacrimal surgery: causative factors and results of surgical management in a tertiary referral center", Ophthalmologica, 224, pp.361~366 (2010)[DOI]
  7. Chandra RK, "Advantages and disadvantages of topical packing in endoscopic sinus surgery", Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 12, pp.21~26 (2004)[DOI]
  8. von Schoenberg M, "Nasal packing after routine nasal surgery--is it justified?", J Laryngol Otol, 107, pp.902~905 (1993)
  9. Ozcan C, "Comparison of rapid rhino and merocel nasal packs in endonasal septal surgery", J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 37, pp.826~831 (2008)
  10. Chevillard C, "Evaluation of calcium alginate nasal packing (Algosteril) versus Polyvinyl acetal (Merocel) for nasal packing after inferior turbinate resection", Rhinology, 44, pp.58~61 (2006)
  11. Okushi T, "Evaluation of symptoms and QOL with calcium alginate versus chitin-coated gauze for middle meatus packing after endoscopic sinus surgery", Auris Nasus Larynx, 39, pp.31~37 (2012)[DOI]
  12. Sirimanna KS, "Calcium alginate fibre (Kaltostat 2) for nasal packing after trimming of turbinates--a pilot study", J Laryngol Otol, 103, pp.1067~1068 (1989)[DOI]
  13. 장선영, "Effects of Nasopore Packing on Dacryocystorhinostomy", Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, 27(2), pp.73~80 (2013), 대한안과학회
  14. Rose GE, "The lacrimal paradox: toward a greater understanding of success in lacrimal surgery", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 20, pp.262~265 (2004)[DOI]
  15. Wang YP, "The effects of Vaseline gauze strip, Merocel, and Nasopore on the formation of synechiae and excessive granulation tissue in the middle meatus and the incidence of major postoperative bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery", J Chin Med Assoc, 74, pp.16~21 (2011)[DOI]
  16. Weber R, "Packing in endonasal surgery", Am J Otolaryngol, 22, pp.306~320 (2001)[DOI]
  17. Shoman N, "Prospective, double-blind, randomized trial evaluating patient satisfaction, bleeding and wound healing using biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam (NasoPore) as a middle meatal spacer in functional endoscopic sinus surgery", J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 38, pp.112~118 (2009)
  18. Park DY, "Comparison of calcium alginate and carboxymethyl cellulose for nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomised, controlled single-blinded trial", Clin Otolaryngol, 41, pp.234~240 (2016)[DOI]
  19. 백지선, "코경유 눈물주머니코안연결술시 코패킹 물질로 사용한 NasoporeⓇ의 임상적 결과", 대한안과학회지, 54(4), pp.557~561 (2013), 대한안과학회
  20. Wu W, "Effects of Merogel coverage on wound healing and ostial patency in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for primary chronic dacryocystitis", Eye (Lond), 25, pp.746~753 (2011)[DOI]
  21. Lee J, "Effectiveness of synthetic polyurethane foam as a nasal packing material in endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy", J Craniofac Surg, 26, pp.2207~2211 (2015)[DOI]
  22. 안성민, "코경유 눈물주머니코안연결술에서 폴리에테르 에스테르 우레탄의 임상적 효과", 대한안과학회지, 53(6), pp.743~748 (2012), 대한안과학회[DOI]
  23. Field FK, "Overview of wound healing in a moist environment", Am J Surg, 167(1A), pp.2S~6S (1994)[DOI]
  24. Lawrence JC, "Dressings and wound infection", Am J Surg, 167(1A), pp.21S~24S (1994)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)