본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of the performance of screening test for gestational diabetes in singleton versus twin pregnancies

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

Objective We compared the performance of the 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in singleton versus twin pregnancies and investigated the need for adjusting GCT cutoff values for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in twin pregnancies among Korean women. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed in women who underwent GCT at 24 to 28 weeks’ gestation and delivered in our department between January 2000 and April 2008. GCT performance was compared between singleton and twin pregnancies for an ideal cutoff value of the GCT for GDM screening. Results GCT results were available in 3,578 pregnancies (3,435 singleton and 143 twin pregnancies). The mean GCT value was higher in the twin group than in the singleton group. Women in the twin group had a higher mean GCT value (P=0.043) and a higher incidence of GCT ≥130, ≥135, and ≥140 mg/dL (P=0.014, 0.005, and 0.015, respectively). The false positive rate for GCT ≥140 mg/dL was significantly higher in the twin than in the singleton group (P=0.042). The optimal GCT screening cutoff value appears to be ≥145 mg/dL in twin pregnancies. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that the GCT is associated with a higher false positive rate in twin rather than singleton pregnancies. This study suggests we should consider adjusting the GCT cutoff value for GDM in Korean twin pregnancies.

Abstract

Objective We compared the performance of the 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in singleton versus twin pregnancies and investigated the need for adjusting GCT cutoff values for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in twin pregnancies among Korean women. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed in women who underwent GCT at 24 to 28 weeks’ gestation and delivered in our department between January 2000 and April 2008. GCT performance was compared between singleton and twin pregnancies for an ideal cutoff value of the GCT for GDM screening. Results GCT results were available in 3,578 pregnancies (3,435 singleton and 143 twin pregnancies). The mean GCT value was higher in the twin group than in the singleton group. Women in the twin group had a higher mean GCT value (P=0.043) and a higher incidence of GCT ≥130, ≥135, and ≥140 mg/dL (P=0.014, 0.005, and 0.015, respectively). The false positive rate for GCT ≥140 mg/dL was significantly higher in the twin than in the singleton group (P=0.042). The optimal GCT screening cutoff value appears to be ≥145 mg/dL in twin pregnancies. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that the GCT is associated with a higher false positive rate in twin rather than singleton pregnancies. This study suggests we should consider adjusting the GCT cutoff value for GDM in Korean twin pregnancies.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Committee on Practice Bulletins: Obstetrics., "Practice Bulletin No. 137: gestational diabetes mellitus", Obstet Gynecol, 2013(2 Pt 1), pp.406~416 (2013)
  2. Landon MB., "Gestational diabetes mellitus", Obstet Gynecol, 118, pp.1379~1393 (2011)
  3. Norwitz ER., "Maternal physiology and complications of multiple pregnancy", Semin Perinatol, 29, pp.338~348 (2005)
  4. Spellacy WN., "Human placental lactogen levels in multiple pregnancies", Obstet Gynecol, 52, pp.210~212 (1978)
  5. Kuhl C., "Etiology and pathogenesis of gestational diabetes", Diabetes Care, 21, pp.B19~B26 (1998)
  6. Kazer RR., "Maternal plasma concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and human placental lactogen (hPL) in twin pregnancies", Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma), 40(3- 4), pp.383~387 (1991)
  7. Chu SY., "Gestational weight gain among US women who deliver twins, 2001-2006", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 200, pp.390.e1~390.e6 (2009)
  8. Fox NS., "Weight gain in twin pregnancies and adverse outcomes : examining the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines", Obstet Gynecol, 116, pp.100~106 (2010)
  9. Buhling KJ., "Risk for gestational diabetes and hypertension for women with twin pregnancy compared to singleton pregnancy", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 269, pp.33~36 (2003)
  10. Rauh-Hain JA., "Risk for developing gestational diabetes in women with twin pregnancies", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 22, pp.293~299 (2009)
  11. Carpenter MW., "Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 144, pp.768~773 (1982)
  12. Spellacy WN., "A case-control study of 1253 twin pregnancies from a 1982-1987 perinatal data base", Obstet Gynecol, 75, pp.168~171 (1990)
  13. Simmons D., "Association between twin pregnancy and hyperglycemia in a multiethnic community in New Zealand", Diabetes Care, 25, pp.934~935 (2002)
  14. Wein P., "Gestational diabetes in twin pregnancy : prevalence and long-term implications", Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 32, pp.325~327 (1992)
  15. van Leeuwen M., "Glucose challenge test for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus : a systematic review", BJOG, 119, pp.393~401 (2012)
  16. Esakoff TF., "Screening for gestational diabetes: different cut-offs for different ethnicities?", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 193(3 Pt 2), pp.1040~1044 (2005)
  17. Leese B., "Appropriate maternal weight gain in singleton and twin pregnancies : what is the evidence?", Hum Fertil(Camb), 15, pp.194~199 (2012)
  18. Beemsterboer SN., "The paradox of declining fertility but increasing twinning rates with advancing maternal age", Hum Reprod, 21, pp.1531~1532 (2006)
  19. Alshami HA., "Pregnancy outcome in late maternal age in a high-income developing country", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 284, pp.1113~1116 (2011)
  20. Baci Y., "Effect of maternal obesity and weight gain on gestational diabetes mellitus", Gynecol Endocrinol, 29, pp.133~136 (2013)
  21. Elliott JP., "Preterm labor in twins and high-order multiples", Clin Perinatol, 34, pp.599~609 (2007)
  22. Yogev Y., "The performance of the screening test for gestational diabetes in twin versus singleton pregnancies", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 27, pp.57~61 (2014)
  23. Shinagawa S., "Maternal basal metabolic rate in twin pregnancy", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 60, pp.145~148 (2005)
  24. Rebarber A., "Screening approach for gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 211, pp.639.e1~639.e5 (2014)
  25. Catherine Kim, "Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Korean Women: Similarities and Differences from Other Racial", Ethnic Groups, 2014, pp.38(1), 1~12[DOI]
  26. Rao AK., "Perinatal complications among different Asian-American subgroups", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194, pp.e39~e41 (2006)
  27. Rao AK., "Perinatal outcomes among Asian American and Pacific Islander women", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 195, pp.834~838 (2006)
  28. Yogev Y., "The association between glucose challenge test, obesity and pregnancy outcome in 6390 non-diabetic women", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 17, pp.29~34 (2005)
  29. Melamed N., "Is abnormal 50-g glucose-challenge testing an independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome?", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 25, pp.2583~2587 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

How high is too high in cutoff levels from 50-g glucose challenge test김종화, 김지예, 노정래, 오수영, 차현화, 최석주대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2016 · 제59권 제3호Treatment of gestational diabetes diagnosed by the IADPSG criteria decreases excessive fetal growth곽동욱, 김문영, 김민형, 김성훈, 김진하, 류현미, 양성우, 이경희, 정진훈, 한유정대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2020 · 제63권 제1호Insulin secretion and insulin resistance in Korean women with gestational diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance김성훈, 김영설, 김태년, 김태선, 남문석, 박용수, 백세현, 양세정, 우정택, 이관우대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2013 · 제28권 제3호한국인에서 임신성 당뇨병의 진단적 100 gm경구 당 부하 검사의 진단 기준의 비교김경태, 김승룡, 안유헌, 이재규, 이정한, 이홍주, 황정혜대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2005 · 제48권 제11호50-g 경구 당부하 검사의 결과와 임신성 당뇨와의 상관관계에 관한 연구김영아, 김종화, 노정래, 서용수, 양순하, 최성진대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2003 · 제46권 제11호임신성 당뇨병의 당 부하 검사에 대한 임상적 고찰최범, 김동진, 김정석, 오은희, 윤은미, 이상혁, 최영미대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2003 · 제46권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)