Surgical technique for single-port laparoscopy in huge ovarian tumors: SW Kim’s technique and comparison to laparotomy
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study aimed to introduce a method to remove huge ovarian tumors (≥15 cm) intact with single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) using SW Kim’s technique and to compare the surgical outcomes with those of laparotomy. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent either SPLS (n=21) with SW Kim’s technique using a specially designed 30×30-cm2-sized 3XL LapBag or laparotomy (n=22) for a huge ovarian tumor from December 2008 to May 2016. Perioperative surgical outcomes were compared. Results: In 19/21 (90.5%) patients, SPLS was successfully performed without any tumor spillage or conversion to multi-port laparoscopy or laparotomy. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics, including tumor diameter and total operation time, between both groups. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for the SPLS group than for the laparotomy group (median, 2 [1 to 5] vs. 4 [3 to 17] days; P<0.001). The number of postoperative general diet build-up days was also significantly shorter for the SPLS group (median, 1 [1 to 4] vs. 3 [2 to 16] days; P<0.001). Immediate post-operative pain score was lower in the SPLS group (median, 2.0 [0 to 8] vs. 4.0 [0 to 8]; P=0.045). Patient-controlled anesthesia was used less in the SPLS group (61.9% vs. 100%). Conclusion: SPLS was successful in removing most large ovarian tumors without rupture and showed quicker recovery and less immediate post-operative pain in comparison to laparotomy. SPLS using SW Kim’s technique could be a feasible solution to removing huge ovarian tumors.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to introduce a method to remove huge ovarian tumors (≥15 cm) intact with single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) using SW Kim’s technique and to compare the surgical outcomes with those of laparotomy. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent either SPLS (n=21) with SW Kim’s technique using a specially designed 30×30-cm2-sized 3XL LapBag or laparotomy (n=22) for a huge ovarian tumor from December 2008 to May 2016. Perioperative surgical outcomes were compared. Results: In 19/21 (90.5%) patients, SPLS was successfully performed without any tumor spillage or conversion to multi-port laparoscopy or laparotomy. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics, including tumor diameter and total operation time, between both groups. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for the SPLS group than for the laparotomy group (median, 2 [1 to 5] vs. 4 [3 to 17] days; P<0.001). The number of postoperative general diet build-up days was also significantly shorter for the SPLS group (median, 1 [1 to 4] vs. 3 [2 to 16] days; P<0.001). Immediate post-operative pain score was lower in the SPLS group (median, 2.0 [0 to 8] vs. 4.0 [0 to 8]; P=0.045). Patient-controlled anesthesia was used less in the SPLS group (61.9% vs. 100%). Conclusion: SPLS was successful in removing most large ovarian tumors without rupture and showed quicker recovery and less immediate post-operative pain in comparison to laparotomy. SPLS using SW Kim’s technique could be a feasible solution to removing huge ovarian tumors.
참고문헌 (14)
- Fagotti A, "Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial", Fertil Steril, 96, pp.255~259 (2011)
- Nieboer TE, "Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, pp.CD003677~ (2009)
- Sassone AM, "Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy", Obstet Gynecol, 78, pp.70~76 (1991)
- Chong GO, "Single-port (OctoPort)assisted extracorporeal ovarian cystectomy for the treatment of large ovarian cysts: compare to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 22, pp.45~49 (2015)
- Chua YD, "Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for a large ovarian tumour: first clinical case report", Minim Invasive Surg, 2011, pp.105643~ (2011)
- Garg P, "Single incision laparoscopic surgery ovarian cystectomy in large benign ovarian cysts using conventional instruments", J Minim Access Surg, 7, pp.232~235 (2011)
- Roh HJ, "Single-port-access, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for benign large adnexal tumors versus single-port pure laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors", Surg Endosc, 26, pp.693~703 (2012)
- Song T, "Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for extremely large ovarian cysts: a feasibility, safety, and patient satisfaction study", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 78, pp.81~87 (2014)
- Takeda A, "Management of large adnexal tumors by isobaric laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with a wound retractor", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 166, pp.185~189 (2013)
- Fagotti A, "Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for treatment of benign adnexal disease: singlecenter experience over 3-years", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 19, pp.695~700 (2012)
- Yim GW, "Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes", Surg Innov, 20, pp.46~54 (2013)
- Goh SM, "Minimal access approach to the management of large ovarian cysts", Surg Endosc, 21, pp.80~83 (2007)
- 이진화, "Single-port access versus conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large uterus", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 58(3), pp.239~245 (2015), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
- Bedaiwy MA, "Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for benign ovarian cystectomies", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 79, pp.179~183 (2015)