본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Surgical decision making for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based approach

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and a variety of procedures can beperformed to correct POP. When deciding on the proper surgical procedure, the surgeon must take into considerationthe individual patient’s risk for surgical complication and prolapse recurrence and her preference. This review willdiscuss the key issues faced in the surgical decision-making process for POP and recommendations based on thecurrent scientific evidence.

Abstract

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and a variety of procedures can beperformed to correct POP. When deciding on the proper surgical procedure, the surgeon must take into considerationthe individual patient’s risk for surgical complication and prolapse recurrence and her preference. This review willdiscuss the key issues faced in the surgical decision-making process for POP and recommendations based on thecurrent scientific evidence.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Olsen AL, "Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence", Obstet Gynecol, 89, pp.501~506 (1997)
  2. Smith FJ, "Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse", Obstet Gynecol, 116, pp.1096~1100 (2010)
  3. Løwenstein E, "Incidence and lifetime risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Denmark from 1977 to 2009", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 26, pp.49~55 (2015)
  4. Maher C, "Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10, pp.CD012376~ (2016)
  5. Rooney K, "Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 195, pp.1837~1840 (2006)
  6. Jelovsek JE, "Pelvic organ prolapse", Lancet, 369, pp.1027~1038 (2007)
  7. Stepp KJ, "Incidence of perioperative complications of urogynecologic surgery in elderly women", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 192, pp.1630~1636 (2005)
  8. Sung VW, "Effect of patient age on increasing morbidity and mortality following urogynecologic surgery", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194, pp.1411~1417 (2006)
  9. Bretschneider CE, "The effect of age on postoperative morbidity in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 21, pp.236~240 (2015)
  10. FitzGerald MP, "Colpocleisis: a review", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 17, pp.261~271 (2006)
  11. Dessie SG, "Obliterative versus reconstructive prolapse repair for women older than 70 : is there an optimal approach", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 23, pp.23~26 (2017)
  12. Lowder JL, "The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse", Obstet Gynecol, 111, pp.152~157 (2008)
  13. Eilber KS, "Outcomes of vaginal prolapse surgery among female Medicare beneficiaries : the role of apical support", Obstet Gynecol, 122, pp.981~987 (2013)
  14. Lowder JL, "Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 214, pp.718~ (2016)
  15. Walters MD, "Surgical treatment of vaginal apex prolapse", Obstet Gynecol, 121, pp.354~374 (2013)
  16. Siddiqui NY, "Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Obstet Gynecol, 125, pp.44~55 (2015)
  17. Haya N, "Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 212, pp.755~ (2015)
  18. De Gouveia De Sa M, "Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 27, pp.3~17 (2016)
  19. Pan K, "A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 132, pp.284~291 (2016)
  20. Nieminen K, "Anatomic and functional assessment and risk factors of recurrent prolapse after vaginal sacrospinous fixation", Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 82, pp.471~478 (2003)
  21. Whiteside JL, "Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 191, pp.1533~1538 (2004)
  22. Diez-Itza I, "Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal surgery : a review at 5 years after surgery", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 18, pp.1317~1324 (2007)
  23. Jeon MJ, "Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 66, pp.268~273 (2008)
  24. Whitehead WE, "Gastrointestinal complications following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 197, pp.78~ (2007)
  25. 조유리, "Significant gastrointestinal morbidity after sacrocolpopexy: The incidence and risk factors", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 57(04), pp.304~309 (2014), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
  26. Lowman JK, "Tobacco use is a risk factor for mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 198, pp.561~ (2008)
  27. Cundiff GW, "Risk factors for mesh", suture erosion following sacral colpopexy, 2008, pp.199, 688~
  28. Tan-Kim J, "Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 22, pp.205~212 (2011)
  29. Akyol A, "Additional surgical risk factors and patient characteristics for mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy", J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 40, pp.1368~1374 (2014)
  30. Frick AC, "Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 19, pp.103~109 (2013)
  31. Korbly NB, "Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 209, pp.470~ (2013)
  32. Ridgeway BM, "Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 213, pp.802~809 (2015)
  33. de Oliveira SA, "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse : systematic review and meta-analysis", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 28, pp.1617~1630 (2017)
  34. Meriwether KV, "Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery : a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 219, pp.129~146 (2018)
  35. Detollenaere RJ, "Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial", BMJ, 351, pp.h3717~ (2015)
  36. Lin TY, "Risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse", J Formos Med Assoc, 104, pp.249~253 (2005)
  37. Suh DH, "Risk factors for the failure of iliococcygeus suspension for uterine prolapse", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 225, pp.210~213 (2018)
  38. Dallas K, "Association between concomitant hysterectomy and repeat surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair in a cohort of nearly 100, 000 women", Obstet Gynecol, 132, pp.1328~1336 (2018)
  39. Jelovsek JE, "Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial", JAMA, 319, pp.1554~1565 (2018)
  40. Gutman RE, "Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse", Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 28, pp.435~440 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)