본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy

Jung-Ho Shin|Sumin Oh
대한산부인과학회 (Korean Soceity of Obstetrics and Gynecology)|2023.11|Obstetrics & Gynecology Science|제66권 제6호|pp. 509-517|DOI 10.5468/ogs.23073

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Postoperative complicationsIntraoperative complicationsRobot surgeryPelvic organ prolapseSacrocolpopexy
주제분류산부인과학

초록

This review aimed to summarize the complications and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Nineteen original articles on 1,440 robotic sacrocolpopexies were reviewed, and three systematic reviews and meta-analyses were summarized in terms of intraoperative, perioperative, postoperative, and/or surgical outcomes. Robotic sacrocolpopexy has demonstrated low overall complication rates and favorable surgical outcomes. Nevertheless, long-term follow-up outcomes regarding objective and/or subjective prolapse recurrence, reoperation rates, and mesh-related complications remain unclear. Further research is required to demonstrate whether the robotic approach for sacrocolpopexy is feasible or can become the modality of choice in the future when performing sacrocolpopexy.

Abstract

This review aimed to summarize the complications and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Nineteen original articles on 1,440 robotic sacrocolpopexies were reviewed, and three systematic reviews and meta-analyses were summarized in terms of intraoperative, perioperative, postoperative, and/or surgical outcomes. Robotic sacrocolpopexy has demonstrated low overall complication rates and favorable surgical outcomes. Nevertheless, long-term follow-up outcomes regarding objective and/or subjective prolapse recurrence, reoperation rates, and mesh-related complications remain unclear. Further research is required to demonstrate whether the robotic approach for sacrocolpopexy is feasible or can become the modality of choice in the future when performing sacrocolpopexy.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Wu JM, "Lifetime risk of stress incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery", Obstet Gynecol, 123, pp.1201~ (2014)
  2. "Pelvic organ prolapse: ACOG practice bulletin, number 214", Obstet Gynecol, 134, pp.e126~42 (2019)
  3. Dällenbach P, "To mesh or not to mesh : a review of pelvic organ reconstructive surgery", Int J Womens Health, 7, pp.331~343 (2015)
  4. Maher C, "Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (4), pp.CD004014~ (2007)
  5. Haya N, "Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 212, pp.755~ (2015)
  6. Nygaard IE, "Abdominal sacrocolpopexy : a comprehensive review", Obstet Gynecol, 104, pp.805~823 (2004)
  7. Callewaert G, "Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse : a systematic review", Gynecol Surg, 13, pp.115~123 (2016)
  8. Moreno Sierra J, "Long-term outcomes after robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse : prospective analysis", Urol Int, 86, pp.414~418 (2011)
  9. Gala RB, "Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology : robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 21, pp.353~361 (2014)
  10. Serati M, "Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse : a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies", Eur Urol, 66, pp.303~318 (2014)
  11. Shin HJ, "Robotic single-port surgery using the da Vinci SP®surgical system for benign gynecologic disease : a preliminary report", Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 59, pp.243~247 (2020)
  12. Matanes E, "Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy : our experience with the first 25 cases", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 23, pp.e14~8 (2017)
  13. Matanes E, "Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 222, pp.358~ (2020)
  14. Ercoli A, "Anatomical insights into sacrocolpopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse", Neurourol Urodyn, 35, pp.813~818 (2016)
  15. Muavha DA, "Laparoscopic surgical anatomy for pelvic floor surgery", Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 54, pp.89~102 (2019)
  16. Liu J, "Robotic single-site sacrocolpopexy with retroperitoneal tunneling", JSLS, 22, pp.e2018~ (2018)
  17. Oh S, "Learning curves and perioperative outcomes of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy on two different da Vinci®surgical systems", J Robot Surg, 17, pp.1457~1462 (2023)
  18. Hudson CO, "Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 20, pp.252~260 (2014)
  19. Chan SS, "Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse : with or without robotic assistance", Hong Kong Med J, 17, pp.54~60 (2011)
  20. Anand M, "Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse", Int Urogynecol J, 25, pp.1193~1200 (2014)
  21. Paraiso MFR, "Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse : a randomized controlled trial", Obstet Gynecol, 118, pp.1005~1013 (2011)
  22. Culligan PJ, "Longterm outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using lightweight Y-mesh", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 26, pp.202~206 (2020)
  23. van Zanten F, "Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery : a prospective study and overview of the literature", Int Urogynecol J, 31, pp.1423~1433 (2020)
  24. Nam G, "Single-incision vs. multiport robotic sacrocolpopexy : 126 consecutive cases at a single institution", J Clin Med, 10, pp.4457~ (2021)
  25. Lee SR, "First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy : single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system", Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 60, pp.60~65 (2021)
  26. Mourik SL, "Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy : quality of life and technique", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 165, pp.122~127 (2012)
  27. Matthew Fagan, "Ostergard's urogynecology and pelvic floor dysfunction", pp.328~329 (2008), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  28. Matthews CA, "Prospective evaluation of surgical outcomes of robotassisted sacrocolpopexy and sacrocervicopexy for the management of apical pelvic support defects", South Med J, 105, pp.274~278 (2012)
  29. Germain A, "Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse", Surg Endosc, 27, pp.525~529 (2013)
  30. Illiano E, "Robot-assisted Vs laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for high-stage pelvic organ prolapse : a prospective, randomized, single-center study", Urology, 134, pp.116~123 (2019)
  31. Anger JT, "Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy : a randomized controlled trial", Obstet Gynecol, 123, pp.5~12 (2014)
  32. Cundiff GW, "Risk factors for mesh", suture erosion following sacral colpopexy, 2008, pp.199, 688~
  33. Deblaere S, "Mesh exposure following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy : a narrative review", Int Urogynecol J, 33, pp.2713~2725 (2022)
  34. Siddiqui NY, "Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 206, pp.435~ (2012)
  35. Geller EJ, "Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy : one-year outcomes", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 18, pp.322~327 (2011)
  36. Myers EM, "Differences in recurrent prolapse at 1 year after total vs supracervical hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy", Int Urogynecol J, 26, pp.585~589 (2015)
  37. Nygaard I, "Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse", JAMA, 309, pp.2016~2024 (2013)
  38. Schulten SF, "Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 227, pp.252~ (2022)
  39. Friedman T, "Risk factors for prolapse recurrence : systematic review and meta-analysis", Int Urogynecol J, 29, pp.13~21 (2018)
  40. Sumin Oh, "How and on whom to perform uterine-preserving surgery for uterine prolapse", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 65(4), pp.317~324 (2022), 대한산부인과학회
  41. Freeman RM, "A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse : LAS study", Int Urogynecol J, 24, pp.377~384 (2013)
  42. Costantini E, "Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy : a randomized, controlled trial", J Urol, 196, pp.159~165 (2016)
  43. Coolen AWM, "Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair : a randomised controlled trial", Int Urogynecol J, 28, pp.1469~1479 (2017)
  44. Matthews CA, "Permanent compared with absorbable suture for vaginal mesh fixation during total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy : a randomized controlled trial", Obstet Gynecol, 136, pp.355~364 (2020)
  45. Tan-Kim J, "A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy", Int Urogynecol J, 26, pp.649~656 (2015)
  46. Berger AA, "Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy : a randomized clinical trial", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 223, pp.258~ (2020)
  47. 이사라, "Robotic Single-Site® Sacrocolpopexy: First Report and Technique Using the Single-Site® Wristed Needle Driver", Yonsei Medical Journal, 57(4), pp.1029~1033 (2016), 연세대학교의과대학[DOI]
  48. Ganesan V, "Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with magnetic retraction : first experience using the SP da Vinci platform", J Robot Surg, 14, pp.753~758 (2020)
  49. Gupta P, "Perioperative outcomes, complications, and efficacy of robotic-assisted prolapse repair : a single institution study of 196 patients", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 24, pp.408~411 (2018)
  50. Thomas TN, "Long-term pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy", Int Urogynecol J, 31, pp.1763~1770 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

Robotic sacrocolpopexyAl-Otaibi Mozon, Ju Hee Kim, Sa Ra Lee대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2024 · 제67권 제2호Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse among Peri- and Post-Menopausal Women김성훈, 채희동, Eun Sil Lee, Ju Hee Kim, Sa Ra Lee대한폐경학회 · 대한폐경학회지2020 · 제26권 제3호Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Compartment Prolapse고광진, 이규성대한배뇨장애요실금학회 · International Neurourology Journal2020 · 제24권 제2호Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse고광진, 서윤석, 성현환, 유규하, 이규성대한배뇨장애요실금학회 · International Neurourology Journal2017 · 제21권 제1호Robotic Single-Site® Sacrocolpopexy: First Report and Technique Using the Single-Site® Wristed Needle Driver이사라연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2016 · 제57권 제4호How and on whom to perform uterine-preserving surgery for uterine prolapse전명재, Sumin Oh대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2022 · 제65권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancyHarshitha Kallubhavi Choodinatha, Min Ryeong Jeon, Bo Young Choi, Kyong-No Lee, Hyeon Ji Kim, Jee Yoon Parkpp. 463-476The effect of a vanishing twin on first- and second-trimester maternal serum markers and ultrasound screening for aneuploidySeungMi Lee, Da Rae Lee, Se Jin Leepp. 477-483Patient blood management to minimize transfusions during the postpartum periodHo Yeon Kim, Eun Saem Choi, Kwan Heup Song, Ki Hoon Ahn, Hai Joong Kimpp. 484-497Clinical relevance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early ovarian cancerYoung Tae Kim, Ki Eun Seon, Sang Wun Kimpp. 498-508Robotic surgery in Gynecology: the present and the futureSu Jeong Lee, 김미란, JungYoon Park, SeongEun Bak, Gen Yuki, Jae-Yen Song, Jisu Mun, Youn-Jee Chungpp. 518-528
원문 보기