Comparison of treatment delay associated with tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement between interventionists
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Fragmented care in nephrology can cause treatment delays. Nephrologists are qualified to perform vascular access-related procedures because they understand the pathophysiology of renal disease and perform physical examination for vascular access. We compared treatment delays associated with tunneled hemodialysis catheter (TDC) placement between interventional radiologists and nephrologists. Methods: We collected data by radiologists from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 and by nephrologists from since July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013. We compared the duration from the hemodialysis decision to TDC placement (D-P duration) and hemodialysis initiation (D-H duration), catheter success and the complication rate, and the frequency and the usage time of non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters (NDCs) before TDC placement. Results: The study analyzed 483 placed TDCs: 280 TDCs placed by radiologists and 203 by nephrologists. The D-P durations were 319 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 180 to 1,057) in the radiologist group and 140 minutes (IQR, 0 to 792) in the nephrologist group. Additionally, the D-H durations were 415 minutes (IQR,260 to 1,091) and 275 minutes (IQR, 123 to 598), respectively. These differences were statistically significant (p = 0.00). The TDC success rate (95.3% vs. 94.5%, respectively; p = 0.32) and complication rate (16.2% vs. 11%, respectively; p = 0.11) did not differ between the groups. The frequency (24.5 vs. 26%, respectively; p = 0.72) and the usage time of NDC (8,451 vs. 8,416 minutes, respectively; p = 0.91) before TDC placement were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Trained interventional nephrologists could perform TDC placement safely, minimizing treatment delays.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Fragmented care in nephrology can cause treatment delays. Nephrologists are qualified to perform vascular access-related procedures because they understand the pathophysiology of renal disease and perform physical examination for vascular access. We compared treatment delays associated with tunneled hemodialysis catheter (TDC) placement between interventional radiologists and nephrologists. Methods: We collected data by radiologists from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 and by nephrologists from since July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013. We compared the duration from the hemodialysis decision to TDC placement (D-P duration) and hemodialysis initiation (D-H duration), catheter success and the complication rate, and the frequency and the usage time of non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters (NDCs) before TDC placement. Results: The study analyzed 483 placed TDCs: 280 TDCs placed by radiologists and 203 by nephrologists. The D-P durations were 319 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 180 to 1,057) in the radiologist group and 140 minutes (IQR, 0 to 792) in the nephrologist group. Additionally, the D-H durations were 415 minutes (IQR,260 to 1,091) and 275 minutes (IQR, 123 to 598), respectively. These differences were statistically significant (p = 0.00). The TDC success rate (95.3% vs. 94.5%, respectively; p = 0.32) and complication rate (16.2% vs. 11%, respectively; p = 0.11) did not differ between the groups. The frequency (24.5 vs. 26%, respectively; p = 0.72) and the usage time of NDC (8,451 vs. 8,416 minutes, respectively; p = 0.91) before TDC placement were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Trained interventional nephrologists could perform TDC placement safely, minimizing treatment delays.
참고문헌 (25)
- Lund GB, "Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists", Radiology, 198, pp.467~472 (1996)
- Trerotola SO, "Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed via the right internal jugular vein by interventional radiologists", Radiology, 203, pp.489~495 (1997)
- Asif A, "Diagnostic and interventional nephrology", Am J Ther, 9, pp.530~536 (2002)
- Jackson JW, "Initial experience of a nephrologist-operated vascular access center", Semin Dial, 13, pp.354~358 (2000)
- Asif A, "Interventional nephrology: from episodic to coordinated vascular access care", J Nephrol, 20, pp.399~405 (2007)
- Moss AH, "Use of a silicone catheter with a Dacron cuff for dialysis short-term vascular access", Am J Kidney Dis, 12, pp.492~498 (1988)
- Moss AH, "Use of a silicone dual-lumen catheter with a Dacron cuff as a long-term vascular access for hemodialysis patients", Am J Kidney Dis, 16, pp.211~215 (1990)
- Schwab SJ, "Prospective evaluation of a Dacron cuffed hemodialysis catheter for prolonged use", Am J Kidney Dis, 11, pp.166~169 (1988)
- Lok CE, "Fistula first initiative: advantages and pitfalls", Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2, pp.1043~1053 (2007)
- Ackad A, "A journey in reversing practice patterns: a multidisciplinary experience in implementing DOQI guidelines for vascular access", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 20, pp.1450~1455 (2005)
- Wasse H, "Predictors of delayed transition from central venous catheter use to permanent vascular access among ESRD patients", Am J Kidney Dis, 49, pp.276~283 (2007)
- Moist LM, "Increased hemodialysis catheter use in Canada and associated mortality risk:data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry 2001-2004", Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 3, pp.1726~1732 (2008)
- Rayner HC, "Vascular access results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): performance against Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K", DOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2004, pp.44(5 Suppl 2), 22~26
- Astor BC, "Type of vascular access and survival among incident hemodialysis patients:the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD(CHOICE) Study", J Am Soc Nephrol, 16, pp.1449~1455 (2005)
- Dhingra RK, "Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patients", Kidney Int, 60, pp.1443~1451 (2001)
- Polkinghorne KR, "Vascular access and all-cause mortality: a propensity score analysis", J Am Soc Nephrol, 15, pp.477~486 (2004)
- Vesely TM, "A position statement from the American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology", Semin Dial, 20, pp.359~364 (2007)
- Beathard GA, "Effectiveness and safety of dialysis vascular access procedures performed by interventional nephrologists", Kidney Int, 66, pp.1622~1632 (2004)
- Cimochowski GE, "Superiority of the internal jugular over the subclavian access for temporary dialysis", Nephron, 54, pp.154~161 (1990)
- Schillinger F, "Post-catheterization venous stenosis in hemodialysis:comparative angiographic study of 50 subclavian and 50internal jugular accesses", Nephrologie, 13, pp.127~133 (1992)
- Vanholder R, "Vascular access for hemodialysis", Artif Organs, 18, pp.263~265 (1994)
- Develter W, "Survival and complications of indwelling venous catheters for permanent use in hemodialysis patients", Artif Organs, 29, pp.399~405 (2005)
- Kakkos SK, "Effectiveness of a new tunneled catheter in preventing catheter malfunction: a comparative study", J Vasc Interv Radiol, 19, pp.1018~1026 (2008)
- Hwang HS, "Comparison of the palindrome vs. step-tip tunneled hemodialysis catheter: a prospective randomized trial", Semin Dial, 25, pp.587~591 (2012)
- Tal MG, "Comparison of recirculation percentage of the palindrome catheter and standard hemodialysis catheters in a swine model", J Vasc Interv Radiol, 16, pp.1237~1240 (2005)