Diagnostic accuracy of manual office blood pressure measurement in ambulatory hypertensive patients in Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Currently, office blood pressure (OBP) is the most widely used method of measuring blood pressure (BP) in daily clinical practice. However, data on the diagnostic accuracy of OBP in reference to ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) are scarce in Korea. Methods: In retrospective and prospective cohorts, manual OBP and ABP measurements were compared among ambulatory hypertensive patients. Hypertension was defined as systolic OBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic OBP ≥ 90 mmHg, and systolic ABP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic ABP ≥ 80 mmHg. Results: In the retrospective cohort (n = 903), the mean OBP1 (before ABP measurement) was higher than ABP in both systolic (138 ± 17 mmHg vs. 123 ± 13 mmHg, p < 0.001) and diastolic (84 ± 12 mmHg vs. 78 ± 11 mmHg, p < 0.001) measurements. Interestingly, there was only a weak correlation between OBP and ABP (r2 = 0.038, p < 0.001). The overall discordance rate of OBP compared to ABP, which is the reference method for measuring BP, was 43.9%. The prospective cohort (n = 57) showed similar results. In a subgroup analysis, male patients had higher false negative results (masked or under-treated hypertension) than did female patients (26.1% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.003), whereas female patients had a higher false positive rate (white-coat or over-treated hypertension) than did male patients (28.7% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of manual OBP is low in reference to ABP. Men and women have different patterns of discordance. These findings indicate that management of hypertensive patients with manual OBP measurements may be suboptimal and encourages the use of ABP in ambulatory hypertensive patients.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Currently, office blood pressure (OBP) is the most widely used method of measuring blood pressure (BP) in daily clinical practice. However, data on the diagnostic accuracy of OBP in reference to ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) are scarce in Korea. Methods: In retrospective and prospective cohorts, manual OBP and ABP measurements were compared among ambulatory hypertensive patients. Hypertension was defined as systolic OBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic OBP ≥ 90 mmHg, and systolic ABP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic ABP ≥ 80 mmHg. Results: In the retrospective cohort (n = 903), the mean OBP1 (before ABP measurement) was higher than ABP in both systolic (138 ± 17 mmHg vs. 123 ± 13 mmHg, p < 0.001) and diastolic (84 ± 12 mmHg vs. 78 ± 11 mmHg, p < 0.001) measurements. Interestingly, there was only a weak correlation between OBP and ABP (r2 = 0.038, p < 0.001). The overall discordance rate of OBP compared to ABP, which is the reference method for measuring BP, was 43.9%. The prospective cohort (n = 57) showed similar results. In a subgroup analysis, male patients had higher false negative results (masked or under-treated hypertension) than did female patients (26.1% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.003), whereas female patients had a higher false positive rate (white-coat or over-treated hypertension) than did male patients (28.7% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of manual OBP is low in reference to ABP. Men and women have different patterns of discordance. These findings indicate that management of hypertensive patients with manual OBP measurements may be suboptimal and encourages the use of ABP in ambulatory hypertensive patients.
참고문헌 (28)
- Kannel WB, "Some lessons in cardiovascular epidemiology from Framingham", Am J Cardiol, 37, pp.269~282 (1976)[DOI]
- Wilson PW, "Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories", Circulation, 97, pp.1837~1847 (1998)[DOI]
- Lewington S, "Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies", Lancet, 360, pp.1903~1913 (2002)[DOI]
- James PA, "2014 Evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8)", JAMA, 311, pp.507~520 (2014)[DOI]
- Lee HY, "The Korean Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension in 2013: its essentials and key points", Pulse (Basel), 3, pp.21~28 (2015)[DOI]
- Coogan N, "Assessing accurate BP measurement: size and technique matter!", Nursing, 45, pp.16~18 (2015)
- Myers MG, "The great myth of office blood pressure measurement", J Hypertens, 30, pp.1894~1898 (2012)[DOI]
- Vinyoles E, "Prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension according to the number of office blood pressure measurements", Rev Clin Esp, 215, pp.425~430 (2015)[DOI]
- Campbell NR, "Misclassification of blood pressure by usual measurement in ambulatory physician practices", Am J Hypertens, 18, pp.1522~1527 (2005)[DOI]
- Little P, "Comparison of agreement between different measures of blood pressure in primary care and daytime ambulatory blood pressure", BMJ, 325, pp.254~ (2002)[DOI]
- Parati G, "European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring", J Hypertens, 32, pp.1359~1366 (2014)[DOI]
- Smulyan H, "Blood pressure measurement: retrospective and prospective views", Am J Hypertens, 24, pp.628~634 (2011)[DOI]
- Krause T, "Management of hypertension: summary of NICE guidance", BMJ, 343, pp.d4891~ (2011)[DOI]
- Shimamoto K, "The Japanese Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2014)", Hypertens Res, 37, pp.253~390 (2014)[DOI]
- Daskalopoulou SS, "The 2015 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension", Can J Cardiol, 31, pp.549~568 (2015)[DOI]
- 김순길, "Clinical Implications of Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring", Korean Circulation Journal, 40(9), pp.423~431 (2010), 대한심장학회
- Yoo WS, "A representative value for 24-hour monitored ambulatory blood pressure", J Korean Med Sci, 1, pp.59~62 (1986)[DOI]
- O'Brien E, "European Society of Hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring", J Hypertens, 31, pp.1731~1768 (2013)[DOI]
- Mancia G, "2013 ESH", ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), 2013, pp.31, 1281~1357
- O'Brien E, "European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement", J Hypertens, 21, pp.821~848 (2003)[DOI]
- Sebo P, "Blood pressure measurements are unreliable to diagnose hypertension in primary care", J Hypertens, 32, pp.509~517 (2014)[DOI]
- Sendra-Lillo J, "Agreement between community pharmacy, physician's office, and home blood pressure measurement methods: the PALMERA study", Am J Hypertens, 25, pp.290~296 (2012)[DOI]
- Banegas JR, "High prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension in people with treated hypertension", Eur Heart J, 35, pp.3304~3312 (2014)[DOI]
- 황의석, "Prevalence, Predictive Factor and Clinical Significance of White-Coat Hypertension and Masked Hypertension in Korean Hypertensive patients", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 22(4), pp.256~262 (2007), 대한내과학회
- Conen D, "Age-specific differences between conventional and ambulatory daytime blood pressure values", Hypertension, 64, pp.1073~1079 (2014)[DOI]
- Ohkubo T, "Prognosis of "masked" hypertension and "white-coat" hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study", J Am Coll Cardiol, 46, pp.508~515 (2005)[DOI]
- Clement DL, "Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension", N Engl J Med, 348, pp.2407~2415 (2003)[DOI]
- Salles GF, "Prognostic impact of clinic and ambulatory blood pressure components in high-risk type 2 diabetic patients: the Rio de Janeiro type 2 diabetes cohort study", J Hypertens, 31, pp.2176~2186 (2013)[DOI]