본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The effect of the dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) regimen on stem cell mobilization and transplant outcomes of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma who are candidates for up-front autologous stem cell transplantation

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background/Aims: Data on dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) as a mobilization regimen, compared to high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC), for up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) is limited. Methods: Consecutive patients with aggressive NHL treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or rituximab-CHOP who underwent chemomobilization using HDC or DHAP plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for up-front ASCT were enrolled from three institutions between 2004 and 2014. Results: Ninety-six patients (57 men) were included. Sixty-five patients (67.7%) received HDC; and 31 (32.3%), DHAP. The total CD34+ cells mobilized were significantly higher in patients receiving DHAP (16.1 vs. 6.1 × 106/kg, p = 0.001). More patients achieved successful mobilization with DHAP (CD34+ cells ≥ 5.0 × 106/kg) compared to HDC (87.1% vs. 61.5%, respectively; p = 0.011), particularly within the first two sessions of apheresis (64.5% vs. 32.3%, respectively; p = 0.003). Mobilization failure rate (CD34+ cells < 2.0 × 106/kg) was significantly higher in patients receiving HDC (20.0% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.032). On multivariate analysis, the DHAP regimen (odds ratio, 4.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 15.17) was an independent predictor of successful mobilization. During chemomobilization, patients receiving HDC experienced more episodes of febrile neutropenia compared to patients receiving DHAP (32.3% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.043). Conclusions: The DHAP regimen was associated with a significantly higher efficacy for stem cell mobilization and lower frequency of febrile neutropenia. Therefore, DHAP plus G-CSF is an effective for mobilization in patients with aggressive NHL who were candidates for up-front ASCT.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Data on dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) as a mobilization regimen, compared to high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC), for up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) is limited. Methods: Consecutive patients with aggressive NHL treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or rituximab-CHOP who underwent chemomobilization using HDC or DHAP plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for up-front ASCT were enrolled from three institutions between 2004 and 2014. Results: Ninety-six patients (57 men) were included. Sixty-five patients (67.7%) received HDC; and 31 (32.3%), DHAP. The total CD34+ cells mobilized were significantly higher in patients receiving DHAP (16.1 vs. 6.1 × 106/kg, p = 0.001). More patients achieved successful mobilization with DHAP (CD34+ cells ≥ 5.0 × 106/kg) compared to HDC (87.1% vs. 61.5%, respectively; p = 0.011), particularly within the first two sessions of apheresis (64.5% vs. 32.3%, respectively; p = 0.003). Mobilization failure rate (CD34+ cells < 2.0 × 106/kg) was significantly higher in patients receiving HDC (20.0% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.032). On multivariate analysis, the DHAP regimen (odds ratio, 4.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 15.17) was an independent predictor of successful mobilization. During chemomobilization, patients receiving HDC experienced more episodes of febrile neutropenia compared to patients receiving DHAP (32.3% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.043). Conclusions: The DHAP regimen was associated with a significantly higher efficacy for stem cell mobilization and lower frequency of febrile neutropenia. Therefore, DHAP plus G-CSF is an effective for mobilization in patients with aggressive NHL who were candidates for up-front ASCT.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Stiff PJ, "Autologous transplantation as consolidation for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma", N Engl J Med, 369, pp.1681~1690 (2013)
  2. Villanueva ML, "The role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma", Clin Adv Hematol Oncol, 4, pp.521~530 (2006)
  3. 이홍기, "R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous transplantation for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma", Blood Research, 49(2), pp.107~114 (2014), 대한혈액학회
  4. Giralt S, "Optimizing autologous stem cell mobilization strategies to improve patient outcomes:consensus guidelines and recommendations", Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 20, pp.295~308 (2014)
  5. Sanchez-Ortega I, "Plerixafor in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma: effectiveness in cases with very low circulating CD34+ cell levels and preemptive intervention vs remobilization", Bone Marrow Transplant, 50, pp.34~39 (2015)
  6. Wuchter P, "Poor mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells-definitions, incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome of autologous transplantation", Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 16, pp.490~499 (2010)
  7. Sung AD, "Outcomes and costs of autologous stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF vs G-CSF alone", Bone Marrow Transplant, 48, pp.1444~1449 (2013)
  8. Narayanasami U, "Randomized trial of filgrastim versus chemotherapy and filgrastim mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells for rescue in autologous transplantation", Blood, 98, pp.2059~2064 (2001)
  9. Pusic I, "Impact of mobilization and remobilization strategies on achieving sufficient stem cell yields for autologous transplantation", Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 14, pp.1045~1056 (2008)
  10. Milone G, "G-CSF alone vs cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in PBPC mobilization of patients with lymphoma: results depend on degree of previous pretreatment", Bone Marrow Transplant, 31, pp.747~754 (2003)
  11. Dazzi C, "Is there any difference in PBPC mobilization between cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF and G-CSF alone in patients with non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma?", Leuk Lymphoma, 39, pp.301~310 (2000)
  12. Dingli D, "Cyclophosphamide mobilization does not improve outcome in patients receiving stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma", Clin Lymphoma Myeloma, 6, pp.384~388 (2006)
  13. Hyun SY, "High-dose etoposide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as an effective chemomobilization regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma previously treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy:a study from the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma", Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 20, pp.73~79 (2014)
  14. Pavone V, "Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with high-dose cyclophosphamide or the DHAP regimen plus G-CSF in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma", Bone Marrow Transplant, 29, pp.285~290 (2002)
  15. Pavone V, "Poor mobilization is an independent prognostic factor in patients with ma-lignant lymphomas treated by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation", Bone Marrow Transplant, 37, pp.719~724 (2006)
  16. 곽재용, "Treatment of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 27(4), pp.369~377 (2012), 대한내과학회[DOI]
  17. Sehn LH, "Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma:optimizing outcome in the context of clinical and biologic heterogeneity", Blood, 125, pp.22~32 (2015)
  18. Vose J, "International peripheral T-cell and natural killer", T-cell lymphoma study: pathology findings and clinical outcomes, 2008, pp.26, 4124~4130
  19. Gertz MA, "Current status of stem cell mobilization", Br J Haematol, 150, pp.647~662 (2010)
  20. Gisselbrecht C, "Rituximab maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed CD20(+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final analysis of the collaborative trial in relapsed aggressive lymphoma", J Clin Oncol, 30, pp.4462~4469 (2012)
  21. Philip T, "Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma", N Engl J Med, 333, pp.1540~1545 (1995)
  22. Suh C, "Initiation of peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest based on peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell counts enumerated by the Sysmex SE9000", Transfusion, 44, pp.1762~1768 (2004)
  23. Cheson BD, "Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma", J Clin Oncol, 25, pp.579~586 (2007)
  24. Ford CD, "Effect of prior chemotherapy on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization", Bone Marrow Transplant, 33, pp.901~905 (2004)
  25. Jillella AP, "Infectious complications in patients receiving mobilization chemotherapy for autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection", J Hematother Stem Cell Res, 12, pp.155~160 (2003)
  26. Jin Seok Ahn, "High-dose Versus Low-dose Cyclophosphamide in Combination with G-CSF for Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Mobilization", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 20(3), pp.224~231 (2005), 대한내과학회
  27. Damon L, "Impact of intensive PBSC mobilization therapy on outcomes following auto-SCT for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma", Bone Marrow Transplant, 42, pp.649~657 (2008)
  28. Yoon DH, "Higher infused CD34+hematopoietic stem cell dose correlates with earlier lymphocyte recovery and better clinical outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma", Transfusion, 49, pp.1890~1900 (2009)
  29. Gordan LN, "Correlation of early lymphocyte recovery and progression-free survival after autologous stem-cell transplant in patients with Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma", Bone Marrow Transplant, 31, pp.1009~1013 (2003)
  30. Sauter CS, "The prognostic impact of peripheral blood progenitor cell dose following high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant for hematologic malignancies", Leuk Lymphoma, 56, pp.1619~1625 (2015)
  31. Ketterer N, "High CD34(+) cell counts decrease hematologic toxicity of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation", Blood, 91, pp.3148~3155 (1998)
  32. Porrata LF, "Early lymphocyte recovery predicts superior survival after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma", Blood, 98, pp.579~585 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

High-dose Versus Low-dose Cyclophosphamide in Combination with G-CSF for Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Mobilization김병국, 김철수, 박선양, 방수미, 윤성수, 이근석, 이문희, 이종석, 임석아, 정철원, 조은경, Chu Myung Seong, Hugh Chul Kim, Jae Hoon Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Jung Ae Lee, Myung Ju Ahn대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2005 · 제20권 제3호Busulfan, Melphalan, and Etoposide (BuME) Showed an Equivalent Effect to Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide (BuCE) as Conditioning Therapy for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or High-Risk Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study bythe Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL)박용, 강혜진, 공지현, 곽재용, 김경하, 김원석, 김훈구, 도영록, 문영철, 박무림, 박성규, 신호진, 양덕환, 오성용, 원종호, 이재훈, Mark Lee대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2023 · 제55권 제1호High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: an Eight-Year Experience장현, 정준원, 한지숙연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2006 · 제47권 제5호Gemcitabine, Etoposide, Cisplatin, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma김기향, 김양수, 손창학, 신성훈, 신호진, 이원식, 정주섭, 조곤재, 주영돈대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2009 · 제24권 제1호Role of frontline autologous stem cell transplantation in young, high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients이석, 김유진, 김종욱, 김희제, 민우성, 민창기, 박장원, 엄기성, 윤재호, 이성은, 이종욱, 전영우, 조석구대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2015 · 제30권 제3호Comparison of Total Body Irradiation (TBI) Conditioning with Non-TBI for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed or Relapsed Mature T- and NK-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma강은석, 고영혜, 김석진, 김원석, 맹치훈, 임도훈, 최준영대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2017 · 제49권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (28건)