Busulfan, Melphalan, and Etoposide (BuME) Showed an Equivalent Effect to Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide (BuCE) as Conditioning Therapy for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or High-Risk Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study bythe Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL)
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard management for relapsed or high-risk non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). We reported the busulfan, melphalan, and etoposide (BuME) conditioning regimen was effective in patients with relapsed or high-risk NHL. Moreover, the busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCE) conditioning regimen has been used widely in ASCT for NHL. Therefore, based on these encouraging results, this randomized phase II multicenter trial compared the outcomes of BuME and BuCE as conditioning therapies for ASCT in patients with NHL.Materials and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive either BuME (n=36) or BuCE (n=39). The BuME regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day, intravenously) administered on days –7, –6, and –5, etoposide (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> intravenously) on days –5 and –4, and melphalan (50 mg/m2/day intravenously) on days –3 and –2. The BuCE regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days –7, –6, and –5, etoposide (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day intravenously) on days –5 and –4, and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days –3 and –2. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS).Results Seventy-five patients were enrolled. Eleven patients (30.5%) in the BuME group and 13 patients (33.3%) in the BuCE group had disease progression or died. The 2-year PFS rate was 65.4% in the BuME group and 60.6% in the BuCE group (p=0.746). There were no non-relapse mortalities within 100 days after transplantation.Conclusion There were no significant differences in PFS between the two groups. Therefore, busulfan-based conditioning regimens, BuME and BuCE, may be important treatment substitutes for the BCNU-containing regimens.
Abstract
Purpose High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard management for relapsed or high-risk non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). We reported the busulfan, melphalan, and etoposide (BuME) conditioning regimen was effective in patients with relapsed or high-risk NHL. Moreover, the busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCE) conditioning regimen has been used widely in ASCT for NHL. Therefore, based on these encouraging results, this randomized phase II multicenter trial compared the outcomes of BuME and BuCE as conditioning therapies for ASCT in patients with NHL.Materials and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive either BuME (n=36) or BuCE (n=39). The BuME regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day, intravenously) administered on days –7, –6, and –5, etoposide (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> intravenously) on days –5 and –4, and melphalan (50 mg/m2/day intravenously) on days –3 and –2. The BuCE regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days –7, –6, and –5, etoposide (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day intravenously) on days –5 and –4, and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days –3 and –2. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS).Results Seventy-five patients were enrolled. Eleven patients (30.5%) in the BuME group and 13 patients (33.3%) in the BuCE group had disease progression or died. The 2-year PFS rate was 65.4% in the BuME group and 60.6% in the BuCE group (p=0.746). There were no non-relapse mortalities within 100 days after transplantation.Conclusion There were no significant differences in PFS between the two groups. Therefore, busulfan-based conditioning regimens, BuME and BuCE, may be important treatment substitutes for the BCNU-containing regimens.
참고문헌 (27)
- Philip T, "Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma", N Engl J Med, 333, pp.1540~1545 (1995)
- Mills W, "BEAM chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma", J Clin Oncol, 13, pp.588~595 (1995)
- Salar A, "Autologous stem cell transplantation for clinically aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma : the role of preparative regimens", Bone Marrow Transplant, 27, pp.405~412 (2001)
- Philip T, "Parma international protocol : pilot study of DHAP followed by involved-field radiotherapy and BEAC with autologous bone marrow transplantation", Blood, 77, pp.1587~1592 (1991)
- Kim JG, "Multicenter study of intravenous busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide(i. v. Bu", Cy, Bone Marrow Transplant, pp.2007, 40[DOI]
- Isidori A, "Novel regimens prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for the management of adults with relapsed", refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma : alternatives to BEAM conditioning, 2016, pp.57, 2499~2509
- Kuittinen T, "Very acute cardiac toxicity during BEAC chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation", Bone Marrow Transplant, 36, pp.1077~1082 (2005)
- Kuittinen T, "Cardiac effects within 3 months of BEAC high-dose therapy in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation", Eur J Haematol, 77, pp.120~127 (2006)
- Lemieux C, "Outcome of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in older patients with B cell lymphoma when selected for fitness and chemosensitive disease", Leuk Res, 79, pp.75~80 (2019)
- Kim KH, "Treatment with intravenous busulfan, melphalan, and etoposide followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma : a multicenter study from the consortium for improving survival of lymphoma", Transpl Int, 33, pp.1211~1219 (2020)
- Bearman SI, "Regimen-related toxicity in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation", J Clin Oncol, 6, pp.1562~1568 (1988)
- Cheson BD, "Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group", J Clin Oncol, 17, pp.1244~ (1999)
- Robinson SP, "High-dose therapy with BEAC conditioning compared to BEAM conditioning prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma : no differences in toxicity or outcome. A matched-control study of the EBMT-Lymphoma Working Party", Bone Marrow Transplant, 53, pp.1553~1559 (2018)
- Redondo AM, "Bendamustine as part of conditioning of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive lymphoma : a phase 2 study from the GELTAMO group", Br J Haematol, 184, pp.797~807 (2019)
- Lee SC, "Excessive toxicity of once daily i. v. BU, melphalan and thiotepa followed by auto SCT on patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma", Bone Marrow Transplant, 45, pp.801~802 (2010)
- Avalos BR, "Preparation for marrow transplantation in Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using Bu", CY, 1993, pp.12, 133~138
- Dalle JH, "Hepatic veno-occlusive disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation : risk factors and stratification, prophylaxis, and treatment", Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 22, pp.400~409 (2016)
- Copelan EA, "Autotransplantation following busulfan, etoposide and cyclophosphamide in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma", Bone Marrow Transplant, 25, pp.1243~1248 (2000)
- Yanamandra U, "Melphalan-induced cardiotoxicity : ventricular arrhythmias", BMJ Case Rep, 2016, pp.bcr2016218652~ (2016)
- Jagadeesh D, "Outcomes of rituximab-BEAM versus BEAM conditioning regimen in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma undergoing autologous transplantation", Cancer, 126, pp.2279~2287 (2020)
- Vose JM, "Phase III randomized study of rituximab", carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan(BEAM)compared with iodine-131 tositumomab, J Clin Oncol, pp.2013, 31[DOI]
- Jo JC, "Busulfan, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan as a high-dose regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphomas", Ann Hematol, 100, pp.189~196 (2021)
- Park SI, "The role of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas in first complete remission : report from COMPLETE, a prospective, multicenter cohort study", Cancer, 125, pp.1507~1517 (2019)
- Roerden M, "The role of autologous stem cell transplantation in peripheral T cell lymphoma : a long-term follow-up single-center experience", J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 145, pp.2595~2604 (2019)
- Zahid U, "A review of autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma", Curr Hematol Malig Rep, 12, pp.217~226 (2017)
- Schuster SJ, "Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma", N Engl J Med, 380, pp.45~56 (2019)
- Viardot A, "Phase 2 study of the bispecific T-cell engager(BiTE)antibody blinatumomab in relapsed", refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 2016, pp.127, 1410~1416
