본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본 천황제의 역사적 변모 과정에 관한 연구 - 천황제의 성격변화와 관련하여 -

A study of historical transformations the institution of the emperor in Japan has gone through- in relation with the changed character of the institution of the emperor -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The institution of the emperor in Japan has existed with a different, unique character at each period when we review through her history. however, the essentialities of having existed such an system has not changed at all, while they has developed in a dialectical way. Although the characters the institution of the emperor has held might differ from one another from ancient period and middle age to modern times, the symbolic role of the emperor having performed has developed with a very high political significance responding to such a thing according to the mobility by need of political authority pertaining to each period. The development of the symbolic role of the emperor like that could be possible because the institution of the emperor has carried out actively the role of ideological equipment which can legalize and rationalize all right in responding of the pertinent period of each political phase. Therefore, the symbolic role of the emperor was based on the mobility of reproduction becoming possible by need of the political authorities which was grasping hegemony during each period, and also was placed in correlation of such an political ones. It means that the symbolic role of the institution of the emperor is not to be fixed, unchanged and transcended, but to be centripetal and unified to merely the ruling forces who were coming into power at each age. That is, the institution of the emperor has been not to play a symbolic role of the unification of the japanese people from below but to perform the very one of the unification from above as a representative of the ruling political authorities, and is carrying out a role like that now as well.

Abstract

The institution of the emperor in Japan has existed with a different, unique character at each period when we review through her history. however, the essentialities of having existed such an system has not changed at all, while they has developed in a dialectical way. Although the characters the institution of the emperor has held might differ from one another from ancient period and middle age to modern times, the symbolic role of the emperor having performed has developed with a very high political significance responding to such a thing according to the mobility by need of political authority pertaining to each period. The development of the symbolic role of the emperor like that could be possible because the institution of the emperor has carried out actively the role of ideological equipment which can legalize and rationalize all right in responding of the pertinent period of each political phase. Therefore, the symbolic role of the emperor was based on the mobility of reproduction becoming possible by need of the political authorities which was grasping hegemony during each period, and also was placed in correlation of such an political ones. It means that the symbolic role of the institution of the emperor is not to be fixed, unchanged and transcended, but to be centripetal and unified to merely the ruling forces who were coming into power at each age. That is, the institution of the emperor has been not to play a symbolic role of the unification of the japanese people from below but to perform the very one of the unification from above as a representative of the ruling political authorities, and is carrying out a role like that now as well.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. "일본보수정치세력에 의한 상징천황제의 정치적 이용에 관한 연구", pp.39~48 (2006)
  2. "점령전후 미국의 일본 천황제 개혁에 관한 연구", 33집 (2006), 일본어문학회
  3. "天皇制の歷史 久野收神島二郞編 天皇制論集第1輯,東京,三一書房" (1974), p.76.
  4. "天皇の地位について 靑山經濟論集 第3卷3號" (1952), pp.219-223.
  5. 小林直樹, "現代天皇制論序說,法律時報,第48卷 4" (1976), p.16.
  6. ". 甦える宮澤憲法學の亡靈現代のエスプリ 第280號" (1990), p.10.
  7. ". 建の事情と皇室の萬世一系の思想の由來 世界 15." (1946)
  8. "政治制度としての天皇制,法律時報,第48卷 4" (1976), p.75.
  9. 鳥越憲三郞, "祭政の二重主權 天皇制論集 第2輯" (1976), pp.174-182
  10. "中世的政治形態の展開と天皇の威 天皇制論集 第2輯" (1976), p.218.
  11. Sahlins M, "Islands of History ch.3 University of Chicago Press", pp.475~
  12. "The Mystique of Monarchy", pp.64~ (2006), Time

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)