본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Difference of Diagnostic Rates and Analytical Methods in the Test Positions of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective To compare the differences of diagnostic rates, of the two widely used test positions, in measuring vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) and selecting the most appropriate analytical method for diagnostic criteria for the patients with vertigo.Methods Thirty-two patients with vertigo were tested in two comparative testing positions: turning the head to the opposite side of the evaluating side and bowing while in seated position, and bowing while in supine positions. Abnormalities were determined by prolonged latency of p13 or n23, shortening of the interpeak latency, and absence of VEMP formation.Results Using the three criteria above for determining abnormalities, both the seated and supine positions showed no significant differences in diagnostic rates, however, the concordance correlation of the two positions was low. When using only the prolonged latency of p13 or n23 in the two positions, diagnostic rates were not significantly different and their concordance correlation was high. On the other hand, using only the shortened interpeak latency in both positions showed no significant difference of diagnostic rates, and the degree of agreement between two positions was low.Conclusion Bowing while in seated position with the head turned in the opposite direction to the area being evaluated is found to be the best VEMP test position due to the consistent level of sternocleidomastoid muscle tension and the high level of compliance. Also, among other diagnostic analysis methods, using prolonged latency of p13 or n23 as the criterion is found to be the most appropriate method of analysis for the VEMP test.

Abstract

Objective To compare the differences of diagnostic rates, of the two widely used test positions, in measuring vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) and selecting the most appropriate analytical method for diagnostic criteria for the patients with vertigo.Methods Thirty-two patients with vertigo were tested in two comparative testing positions: turning the head to the opposite side of the evaluating side and bowing while in seated position, and bowing while in supine positions. Abnormalities were determined by prolonged latency of p13 or n23, shortening of the interpeak latency, and absence of VEMP formation.Results Using the three criteria above for determining abnormalities, both the seated and supine positions showed no significant differences in diagnostic rates, however, the concordance correlation of the two positions was low. When using only the prolonged latency of p13 or n23 in the two positions, diagnostic rates were not significantly different and their concordance correlation was high. On the other hand, using only the shortened interpeak latency in both positions showed no significant difference of diagnostic rates, and the degree of agreement between two positions was low.Conclusion Bowing while in seated position with the head turned in the opposite direction to the area being evaluated is found to be the best VEMP test position due to the consistent level of sternocleidomastoid muscle tension and the high level of compliance. Also, among other diagnostic analysis methods, using prolonged latency of p13 or n23 as the criterion is found to be the most appropriate method of analysis for the VEMP test.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Tullio P, "Das ohr und die entstehung der sprache und schrift" (1929), Urban & Schwarzenberg
  2. Bickford RG, "Nature of average evoked potentials to sound and other stimuli in man", Ann N Y Acad Sci, 112, pp.204~223 (1964)
  3. Didier A, "Acoustic responses recorded from the saccular bundle on the eighth nerve of the guinea pig", Hear Res, 37, pp.123~127 (1989)
  4. Ferber-Viart C, "Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in humans: a review", Acta Otolaryngol, 119, pp.6~15 (1999)
  5. Colebatch JG, "Vestibular evoked potentials in human neck muscles before and after unilateral vestibular deafferentation", Neurology, 42, pp.1635~1636 (1992)
  6. Mudduwa R, "Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: review", J Laryngol Otol, 124, pp.1043~1050 (2010)
  7. Colebatch JG, "Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 57, pp.190~197 (1994)
  8. Murofushi T, "Absent vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in vestibular neurolabyrinthitis: an indicator of inferior vestibular nerve involvement?", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 122, pp.845~848 (1996)
  9. Murofushi T, "Physiological and anatomical study of click-sensitive primary vestibular afferents in the guinea pig", Acta Otolaryngol, 117, pp.66~72 (1997)
  10. Kim JD, "The effects of test positions and acoustic stimulations on the vestibular evoked myogenic potentials", J Korean Bal Soc, 6, pp.21~28 (2007)
  11. Goh EK, "Vestibular evoked myogenic potential", J Clin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 19, pp.13~17 (2008)
  12. Lee SK, "Age-related differences in parameters of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials", Acta Otolaryngol, 128, pp.66~72 (2008)
  13. Ferber-Viart C, "Myogenic vestibular-evoked potentials in normal subjects:a comparison between responses obtained from sternomastoid and trapezius muscles", Acta Otolaryngol, 117, pp.472~481 (1997)
  14. Cody DT, "Averaged evoked myogenic responses in normal man", Laryngoscope, 79, pp.400~416 (1969)
  15. 김훈, "현훈증 환자 평가에서 전정유발근전위의 임상적 유용성", 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학, 46(5), pp.391~395 (2003), 대한이비인후과학회
  16. Wang CT, "Comparison of the head elevation versus rotation methods in eliciting vestibular evoked myogenic potentials", Ear Hear, 27, pp.376~381 (2006)
  17. Park SH, "The clinical significance of vestibular evoked myogenic potential evoked by click sound", Korean J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg, 44, pp.1253~1258 (2001)
  18. Ahn YJ, "Diagnostic value of vestibular evoked myogenic potential in acoustic neuroma", J Korean Bal Soc, 6, pp.138~142 (2007)
  19. Matsuzaki M, "Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in acoustic tumor patients with normal auditory brainstem responses", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 256, pp.1~4 (1999)
  20. Murofushi T, "Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with acoustic neuromas", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 124, pp.509~512 (1998)
  21. Patko T, "Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients suffering from an unilateral acoustic neuroma: a study of 170 patients", Clin Neurophysiol, 114, pp.1344~1350 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)