Diagnostic accuracy of 22/25-gauge core needle in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling: systematic review and meta-analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound- guided core needle aspiration with that of standard fine-needle aspiration by systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Studies using 22/25-gauge core needles, irrespective of comparison with standard fine needles, were comprehensively reviewed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic curves for the diagnosis of malignancy were used to estimate the overall diagnostic efficiency. Results: The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of the core needle for the diagnosis of malignancy were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 0.90), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1), and 167.37 (95% CI, 65.77 to 425.91), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of the standard needle were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88), 1 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1), and 130.14 (95% CI, 34.00 to 495.35), respectively. The area under the curve of core and standard needle in the diagnosis of malignancy was 0.974 and 0.955, respectively. The core and standard needle were comparable in terms of pancreatic malignancy diagnosis. There was no significant difference in procurement of optimal histologic cores between core and standard needles (risk ratio [RR], 0.545; 95% CI, 0.187 to 1.589). The number of needle passes for diagnosis was significantly lower with the core needle (standardized mean difference, –0.72; 95% CI, –1.02 to –0.41). There were no significant differences in overall complications (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.34 to 4.62) and technical failure (RR, 5.07; 95% CI, 0.68 to 37.64). Conclusions: Core and standard needles were comparable in terms of diagnostic accuracy, technical performance, and safety profile.
Abstract
Background/Aims: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound- guided core needle aspiration with that of standard fine-needle aspiration by systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Studies using 22/25-gauge core needles, irrespective of comparison with standard fine needles, were comprehensively reviewed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic curves for the diagnosis of malignancy were used to estimate the overall diagnostic efficiency. Results: The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of the core needle for the diagnosis of malignancy were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 0.90), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1), and 167.37 (95% CI, 65.77 to 425.91), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of the standard needle were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88), 1 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1), and 130.14 (95% CI, 34.00 to 495.35), respectively. The area under the curve of core and standard needle in the diagnosis of malignancy was 0.974 and 0.955, respectively. The core and standard needle were comparable in terms of pancreatic malignancy diagnosis. There was no significant difference in procurement of optimal histologic cores between core and standard needles (risk ratio [RR], 0.545; 95% CI, 0.187 to 1.589). The number of needle passes for diagnosis was significantly lower with the core needle (standardized mean difference, –0.72; 95% CI, –1.02 to –0.41). There were no significant differences in overall complications (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.34 to 4.62) and technical failure (RR, 5.07; 95% CI, 0.68 to 37.64). Conclusions: Core and standard needles were comparable in terms of diagnostic accuracy, technical performance, and safety profile.
참고문헌 (33)
- Puli SR, "How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass? A meta-analysis and systematic review", Pancreas, 42, pp.20~26 (2013)
- Hewitt MJ, "EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.319~331 (2012)
- Caraway NP, "Evolving role of FNA biopsy in diagnosing lymphoma: past, present, and future", Cancer Cytopathol, 123, pp.389~393 (2015)
- DeWitt J, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor", Surg Endosc, 25, pp.2192~2202 (2011)
- Larghi A, "EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study", Gastrointest Endosc, 59, pp.185~190 (2004)
- Iglesias-Garcia J, "Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.1189~1196 (2011)
- Larghi A, "Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study", Surg Endosc, 27, pp.3733~3738 (2013)
- Moher D, "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement", Open Med, 3, pp.e123~e130 (2009)
- Stroup DF, "Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting: Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group", JAMA, 283, pp.2008~2012 (2000)
- Leeflang MM, "Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy", Ann Intern Med, 149, pp.889~897 (2008)
- Whiting P, "The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews", BMC Med Res Methodol, 3, pp.25~ (2003)
- Reitsma JB, "Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews", J Clin Epidemiol, 58, pp.982~990 (2005)
- Glas AS, "The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance", J Clin Epidemiol, 56, pp.1129~1135 (2003)
- Irwig L, "Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy", J Clin Epidemiol, 48, pp.119~130 (1995)
- Moses LE, "Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations", Stat Med, 12, pp.1293~1316 (1993)
- Higgins JP, "Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses", BMJ, 327, pp.557~560 (2003)
- Higgins JP, "Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions" (2011), Cochrane Collaboration
- Deeks JJ, "The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed", J Clin Epidemiol, 58, pp.882~893 (2005)
- Bang JY, "Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions", Gastrointest Endosc, 76, pp.321~327 (2012)
- Hucl T, "Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study", Endoscopy, 45, pp.792~798 (2013)
- Strand DS, "EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms", Diagn Cytopathol, 42, pp.751~758 (2014)
- Lee YN, "Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study", Endoscopy, 46, pp.1056~1062 (2014)
- Vanbiervliet G, "Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study", Endoscopy, 46, pp.1063~1070 (2014)
- Paik WH, "Prospective evaluation of new 22 gauge endoscopic ultrasound core needle using capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique for intra-abdominal solid masses", J Clin Gastroenterol, 49, pp.199~205 (2015)
- Witt BL, "A comparative needle study: EUS-FNA procedures using the HD ProCor and EchoTip 22-gauge needle types", Diagn Cytopathol, 41, pp.1069~1074 (2013)
- Berzosa M, "Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions", Endosc Ultrasound, 4, pp.28~33 (2015)
- Iwashita T, "High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions", Gastrointest Endosc, 77, pp.909~915 (2013)
- Fabbri C, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of small solid pancreatic lesions using a 22-gauge needle with side fenestration", Surg Endosc, 29, pp.1586~1590 (2015)
- Siddiqui UD, "EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles", Gastrointest Endosc, 70, pp.1093~1097 (2009)
- Yusuf TE, "Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience", Endoscopy, 41, pp.445~448 (2009)
- Yasuda I, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders: feasibility of immunohistological, flow cytometric, and cytogenetic assessments", Am J Gastroenterol, 107, pp.397~404 (2012)
- Iwashita T, "Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10, pp.316~322 (2012)
- LeBlanc JK, "Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis", Gastrointest Endosc, 59, pp.475~481 (2004)