Can Short-Term Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Combined With Visual Biofeedback Training Improve Hemiplegic Upper Limb Function of Subacute Stroke Patients?
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To Investigate the synergic effects of short-term constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and visual biofeedback training (VBT) in subacute stroke patients.Methods Thirty-two subacute stroke patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three groups: short-term CIMT with VBT, VBT only, and control groups. We applied CIMT for an hour daily during VBT instead of the ordinary restraint time, referred to as ‘short-term’ CIMT. Short-term CIMT with VBT group received simultaneous VBT with CIMT, whereas the VBT the only group received VBT without CIMT for an hour a day for 2 weeks. The control group received conventional occupational therapy (OT) alone. Patients underwent the Purdue Pegboard Test, the JAMAR grip strength test, the Wolf Motor Function Test, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (upper extremity), Motricity index and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index test to evaluate motor functions of the hemiplegic upper limb at baseline, post-treatment, and 2 weeks after treatment.Results No significant differences were observed between short-term CIMT with VBT and VBT only groups. Both groups showed significantly higher scores compared to the control group in the WMFT and FMA tests. However, the short-term CIMT with VBT group showed significant improvement (p<0.05) compared with the control group in both grasp and pad pinch at post-treatment and 2 weeks after treatment while the VBT only group did not.Conclusion Short-term CIMT with VBT group did not show significant improvement of hemiplegic upper limb function of subacute stroke patients, compared to VBT only group. Larger sample sizes and different restraint times would be needed to clarify the effect.
Abstract
Objective To Investigate the synergic effects of short-term constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and visual biofeedback training (VBT) in subacute stroke patients.Methods Thirty-two subacute stroke patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three groups: short-term CIMT with VBT, VBT only, and control groups. We applied CIMT for an hour daily during VBT instead of the ordinary restraint time, referred to as ‘short-term’ CIMT. Short-term CIMT with VBT group received simultaneous VBT with CIMT, whereas the VBT the only group received VBT without CIMT for an hour a day for 2 weeks. The control group received conventional occupational therapy (OT) alone. Patients underwent the Purdue Pegboard Test, the JAMAR grip strength test, the Wolf Motor Function Test, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (upper extremity), Motricity index and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index test to evaluate motor functions of the hemiplegic upper limb at baseline, post-treatment, and 2 weeks after treatment.Results No significant differences were observed between short-term CIMT with VBT and VBT only groups. Both groups showed significantly higher scores compared to the control group in the WMFT and FMA tests. However, the short-term CIMT with VBT group showed significant improvement (p<0.05) compared with the control group in both grasp and pad pinch at post-treatment and 2 weeks after treatment while the VBT only group did not.Conclusion Short-term CIMT with VBT group did not show significant improvement of hemiplegic upper limb function of subacute stroke patients, compared to VBT only group. Larger sample sizes and different restraint times would be needed to clarify the effect.
참고문헌 (28)
- Kwakkel G, "Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb:impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke", Stroke, 34, pp.2181~2186 (2003)
- Wolf SL, "The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy", Stroke, 41, pp.2309~2315 (2010)
- Taub E, "Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, pp.347~354 (1993)
- Sterr A, "Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83, pp.1726~1731 (2002)
- Morris DM, "Constraint-induced movement therapy for moter recovery after stroke", NeuroRehabilitation, 9, pp.29~43 (1997)
- Page SJ, "Stroke patients’ and therapists’ opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy", Clin Rehabil, 16, pp.55~60 (2002)
- 최수원, "뇌졸중 환자의 건측 상지 운동 제한 치료 시 중도 탈락과 치료 의욕의 중요성", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 32(1), pp.20~25 (2008), 대한재활의학회
- Urra O, "The impact of visual feedback on the motor control of the upper-limb", Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2015, pp.3945~3948 (2015)
- Kim CY, "Effect of spatial target reaching training based on visual biofeedback on the upper extremity function of hemiplegic stroke patients", J Phys Ther Sci, 27, pp.1091~1096 (2015)
- Butler AJ, "Mental practice with motor imagery:evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(12 Suppl 2), pp.S2~11 (2006)
- 윤진아, "Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Mirror Therapy for Patients With Subacute Stroke", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38(4), pp.458~466 (2014), 대한재활의학회
- 김금순, "바이오피드백과 건측 억제유도 운동을 이용한 상지운동훈련이 편마비 환자의 상지기능에 미치는 효과", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 33(5), pp.591~600 (2003), 한국간호과학회
- Duncan PW, "Health status of individuals with mild stroke", Stroke, 28, pp.740~745 (1997)
- Pollock A, "Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (11), pp.CD010820~ (2014)
- Holden MK, "Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation:review", Cyberpsychol Behav, 8, pp.187~219 (2005)
- Yin CW, "Virtual reality for upper extremity rehabilitation in early stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial", Clin Rehabil, 28, pp.1107~1114 (2014)
- Blanton S, "Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke rehabilitation: perspectives on future clinical applications", NeuroRehabilitation, 23, pp.15~28 (2008)
- Woldag H, "Is the repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements beneficial for motor recovery in stroke patients?", Clin Rehabil, 17, pp.723~730 (2003)
- Woldag H, "Repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements with shaping is beneficial for motor improvement in patients after stroke", J Rehabil Med, 42, pp.582~587 (2010)
- Sterr A, "CI therapy distribution: theory, evidence and practice", NeuroRehabilitation, 21, pp.97~105 (2006)
- Sterr A, "Motor-improvement following intensive training in low-functioning chronic hemiparesis", Neurology, 61, pp.842~844 (2003)
- Brogardh C, "Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use", Clin Rehabil, 20, pp.218~227 (2006)
- Souza WC, "Similar effects of two modified constraint-induced therapy protocols on motor impairment, motor function and quality of life in patients with chronic stroke", Neurol Int, 7, pp.5430~ (2015)
- Treger I, "Constraint-induced movement therapy alters cerebral blood flow in subacute post-stroke patients", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 91, pp.804~809 (2012)
- Shi YX, "Modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus traditional rehabilitation in patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and metaanalysis", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 92, pp.972~982 (2011)
- Pedlow K, "Application of constraint-induced movement therapy in clinical practice: an online survey", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 95, pp.276~282 (2014)
- Burns A, "Does the use of a constraint mitten to encourage use of the hemiplegic upper limb improve arm function in adults with subacute stroke?", Clin Rehabil, 21, pp.895~904 (2007)
- Gauthier LV, "Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke", Stroke, 39, pp.1520~1525 (2008)