Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Mirror Therapy for Patients With Subacute Stroke
3
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and combined mirror therapy for inpatient rehabilitation of the patients with subacute stroke.Methods Twenty-six patients with subacute stroke were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups: CIMT combined with mirror therapy group, CIMT only group, and control group. Two weeks of CIMT for 6 hours a day with or without mirror therapy for 30 minutes a day were performed under supervision. All groups received conventional occupational therapy for 40 minutes a day for the same period. The CIMT only group and control group also received additional self-exercise to substitute for mirror therapy. The box and block test, 9-hole Pegboard test, grip strength, Brunnstrom stage, Wolf motor function test, Fugl-Meyer assessment, and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index were performed prior to and two weeks after the treatment. Results After two weeks of treatment, the CIMT groups with and without mirror therapy showed higher improvement (p<0.05) than the control group, in most of functional assessments for hemiplegic upper extremity. The CIMT combined with mirror therapy group showed higher improvement than CIMT only group in box and block test, 9-hole Pegboard test, and grip strength, which represent fine motor functions of the upper extremity.Conclusion The short-term CIMT combined with mirror therapy group showed more improvement compared to CIMT only group and control group, in the fine motor functions of hemiplegic upper extremity for the patients with subacute stroke.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and combined mirror therapy for inpatient rehabilitation of the patients with subacute stroke.Methods Twenty-six patients with subacute stroke were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups: CIMT combined with mirror therapy group, CIMT only group, and control group. Two weeks of CIMT for 6 hours a day with or without mirror therapy for 30 minutes a day were performed under supervision. All groups received conventional occupational therapy for 40 minutes a day for the same period. The CIMT only group and control group also received additional self-exercise to substitute for mirror therapy. The box and block test, 9-hole Pegboard test, grip strength, Brunnstrom stage, Wolf motor function test, Fugl-Meyer assessment, and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index were performed prior to and two weeks after the treatment. Results After two weeks of treatment, the CIMT groups with and without mirror therapy showed higher improvement (p<0.05) than the control group, in most of functional assessments for hemiplegic upper extremity. The CIMT combined with mirror therapy group showed higher improvement than CIMT only group in box and block test, 9-hole Pegboard test, and grip strength, which represent fine motor functions of the upper extremity.Conclusion The short-term CIMT combined with mirror therapy group showed more improvement compared to CIMT only group and control group, in the fine motor functions of hemiplegic upper extremity for the patients with subacute stroke.
참고문헌 (18)
- Basmajian JV, "The Winter of Our Discontent: breaking intolerable time locks for stroke survivors. The 38th annual John Stanley Coulter lecture", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 70, pp.92~94 (1989)
- Pang MY, "A community-based upper-extremity group exercise program improves motor function and performance of functional activities in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87, pp.1~9 (2006)
- Taub E, "Nepomuceno CS, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, pp.347~354 (1993)
- Taub E, "Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients", Top Stroke Rehabil, 3, pp.38~61 (1997)
- Dromerick AW, "Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?", Stroke, 31, pp.2984~2988 (2000)
- Page SJ, "Modified constraint-induced therapy in subacute stroke: a case report", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83, pp.286~290 (2002)
- Peurala SH, "Effectiveness of constraintinduced movement therapy on activity and participation after stroke: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials", Clin Rehabil, 26, pp.209~223 (2012)
- Ramachandran VS, "Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors", Proc Biol Sci, 263, pp.377~386 (1996)
- Altschuler EL, "Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror", Lancet, 353, pp.2035~2036 (1999)
- Bonifer NM, "Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86, pp.1867~1873 (2005)
- Taub E, "Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications", pp.371~401 (1980), Williams & Wilkins
- Taub E, "Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback", Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 4, pp.335~374 (1976)
- Wilkinson PR, "long-term follow-up of stroke patients", Stroke, 28, pp.507~512 (1997)
- Schaechter JD, "Structural and functional plasticity in the somatosensory cortex of chronic stroke patients", Brain, 129(Pt 10), pp.2722~2733 (2006)
- Dancause N, "Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury", J Neurosci, 25, pp.10167~10179 (2005)
- Gauthier LV, "Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke", Stroke, 39, pp.1520~1525 (2008)
- Garry MI, "Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability", Exp Brain Res, 163, pp.118~122 (2005)
- Fadiga L, "Electrophysiology of action representation", J Clin Neurophysiol, 21, pp.157~169 (2004)