Validation of Korean Version of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To translate the English version of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale (LCADL) into a Korean version and to determine the reliability and validity of the Korean version in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods The English version of LCADL was translated into Korean and back-translated into English. Subsequently, the back-translated version was reviewed and compared with the original, and thus the final K-LCADL was obtained. To evaluate the validation of the K-LCADL, patients simultaneously completed a pulmonary function test, a 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and questionnaires, including the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, the Korean version of the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (K-SGRQ), the Korean version of the COPD Assessment Test (K-CAT), and the Korean version of the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (K-EQ-5D). To assess test-retest reliability, the K-LCADL was again administered to the same patients within 2 weeks from initial assessment. Results A total of 94 patients participated in the present study. The total K-LCADL score was positively correlated with the K-SGRQ (r=0.802, p<0.001), the mMRC dyspnea scale (r=0.603, p<0.001), and the K-CAT score (r=0.714, p<0.001), and negatively correlated with the K-EQ-5D (r=-0.764, p<0.001), 6MWT (r=-0.635, p<0.001), forced expiratory volume in one second 1 (r=-0.416, p=0.002), and forced vital capacity (r=-0.397, p=0.023). Intraclass correlation coefficient of the K-LCADL was 0.951 (p<0.001). Conclusion The K-LCADL is a reliable and valid questionnaire for evaluating limitation of activities of daily living in patients with COPD.
Abstract
Objective To translate the English version of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale (LCADL) into a Korean version and to determine the reliability and validity of the Korean version in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods The English version of LCADL was translated into Korean and back-translated into English. Subsequently, the back-translated version was reviewed and compared with the original, and thus the final K-LCADL was obtained. To evaluate the validation of the K-LCADL, patients simultaneously completed a pulmonary function test, a 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and questionnaires, including the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, the Korean version of the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (K-SGRQ), the Korean version of the COPD Assessment Test (K-CAT), and the Korean version of the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (K-EQ-5D). To assess test-retest reliability, the K-LCADL was again administered to the same patients within 2 weeks from initial assessment. Results A total of 94 patients participated in the present study. The total K-LCADL score was positively correlated with the K-SGRQ (r=0.802, p<0.001), the mMRC dyspnea scale (r=0.603, p<0.001), and the K-CAT score (r=0.714, p<0.001), and negatively correlated with the K-EQ-5D (r=-0.764, p<0.001), 6MWT (r=-0.635, p<0.001), forced expiratory volume in one second 1 (r=-0.416, p=0.002), and forced vital capacity (r=-0.397, p=0.023). Intraclass correlation coefficient of the K-LCADL was 0.951 (p<0.001). Conclusion The K-LCADL is a reliable and valid questionnaire for evaluating limitation of activities of daily living in patients with COPD.
참고문헌 (27)
- Klijn P, "Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale in patients with severe COPD", Medicine (Baltimore), 94, pp.e2191~ (2015)[DOI]
- Shah S, "Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation", J Clin Epidemiol, 42, pp.703~709 (1989)[DOI]
- Vitacca M, "Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases", Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 11, pp.1199~1206 (2016)
- Garrod R, "Development and validation of a standardized measure of activity of daily living in patients with severe COPD: the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale (LCADL)", Respir Med, 94, pp.589~596 (2000)[DOI]
- Yohannes AM, "The Manchester Respiratory Activities of Daily Living questionnaire: development, reliability, validity, and responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation", J Am Geriatr Soc, 48, pp.1496~1500 (2000)[DOI]
- Lareau SC, "Development and testing of the Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire (PFSDQ)", Heart Lung, 23, pp.242~250 (1994)
- Lareau SC, "Development and testing of the modified version of the pulmonary functional status and dyspnea questionnaire (PFSDQ-M)", Heart Lung, 27, pp.159~168 (1998)[DOI]
- Morimoto M, "Development of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease activity rating scale: reliability, validity and factorial structure", Nurs Health Sci, 5, pp.23~30 (2003)[DOI]
- Weaver TE, "The development and psychometric evaluation of the Pulmonary Functional Status Scale: an instrument to assess functional status in pulmonary disease", J Cardiopulm Rehabil, 18, pp.105~111 (1998)[DOI]
- Garrod R, "An evaluation of the reliability and sensitivity of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale (LCADL)", Respir Med, 96, pp.725~730 (2002)[DOI]
- Carpes MF, "The Brazilian Portuguese version of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale for use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease", J Bras Pneumol, 34, pp.143~151 (2008)[DOI]
- Pitta F, "Validation of the Portuguese version of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale (LCADL) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients", Rev Port Pneumol, 14, pp.27~47 (2008)[DOI]
- Vilaro J, "Daily living activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: validation of the Spanish version and comparative analysis of 2 questionnaires", Med Clin (Barc), 129, pp.326~332 (2007)[DOI]
- 김영삼, "한국어판 세인트조지 호흡기설문의 타당도와 신뢰도 검정", Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 61(2), pp.121~128 (2006), 대한결핵및호흡기학회
- 황용일, "A Validation Study for the Korean Version of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT)", Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 74(6), pp.256~263 (2013), 대한결핵및호흡기학회
- Pauwels RA, "Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI", WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary, 2001, pp.163, 1256~1276
- Vogelmeier CF, "Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 Report: GOLD Executive Summary", Respirology, 22, pp.575~601 (2017)[DOI]
- Stoller JK, "Further specification and evaluation of a new clinical index for dyspnea", Am Rev Respir Dis, 134, pp.1129~1134 (1986)
- 박철주, "대형 백화점의 신규출점에 따른 예상 매출액 추정", 유통과학연구, 4(2), pp.5~20 (2006), 한국유통과학회
- Terwee CB, "Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires", J Clin Epidemiol, 60, pp.34~42 (2007)[DOI]
- 김호철, "만성폐쇄성폐질환 환자에서 골격근 기능 이상", Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 68(3), pp.125~139 (2010), 대한결핵및호흡기학회
- Williams SJ, "Impairment, disability and handicap in chronic respiratory illness", Soc Sci Med, 29, pp.609~616 (1989)[DOI]
- Jones PW, "A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation: the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire", Am Rev Respir Dis, 145, pp.1321~1327 (1992)[DOI]
- Travis WD, "An official American Thoracic Society", European Respiratory Society statement: update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, 2013, pp.188, 733~748
- Ries AL, "Pulmonary rehabilitation: joint ACCP", AACVPR evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 2007, pp.131(5 Suppl), 4S~42S
- Bourbeau J, "Activities of life: the COPD patient", COPD, 6, pp.192~200 (2009)[DOI]
- Curtis JR, "Patient-assessed health outcomes in chronic lung disease: what are they, how do they help us, and where do we go from here?", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 156(4), pp.1032~1039 (1997)[DOI]