The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To evaluate the validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and general movements (GMs) assessment for predicting Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) score at 12 months in preterm infants. Methods A total of 44 preterm infants who underwent the GMs and TIMP at 1 month and 3 months of corrected age (CA) and whose motor performance was evaluated using AIMS at 12 months CA were included. GMs were judged as abnormal on basis of poor repertoire or cramped-synchronized movements at 1 month CA and abnormal or absent fidgety movement at 3 months CA. TIMP and AIMS scores were categorized as normal (average and low average and >5th percentile, respectively) or abnormal (below average and far below average or <5th percentile, respectively). Correlations between GMs and TIMP scores at 1 month and 3 months CA and the AIMS classification at 12 months CA were examined. Results The TIMP score at 3 months CA and GMs at 1 month and 3 months CA were significantly correlated with the motor performance at 12 months CA. However, the TIMP score at 1 month CA did not correlate with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA. For infants with normal GMs at 3 months CA, the TIMP score at 3 months CA correlated significantly with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA. Conclusion Our findings suggest that neuromotor assessment using GMs and TIMP could be useful to identify preterm infants who are likely to benefit from intervention.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and general movements (GMs) assessment for predicting Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) score at 12 months in preterm infants. Methods A total of 44 preterm infants who underwent the GMs and TIMP at 1 month and 3 months of corrected age (CA) and whose motor performance was evaluated using AIMS at 12 months CA were included. GMs were judged as abnormal on basis of poor repertoire or cramped-synchronized movements at 1 month CA and abnormal or absent fidgety movement at 3 months CA. TIMP and AIMS scores were categorized as normal (average and low average and >5th percentile, respectively) or abnormal (below average and far below average or <5th percentile, respectively). Correlations between GMs and TIMP scores at 1 month and 3 months CA and the AIMS classification at 12 months CA were examined. Results The TIMP score at 3 months CA and GMs at 1 month and 3 months CA were significantly correlated with the motor performance at 12 months CA. However, the TIMP score at 1 month CA did not correlate with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA. For infants with normal GMs at 3 months CA, the TIMP score at 3 months CA correlated significantly with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA. Conclusion Our findings suggest that neuromotor assessment using GMs and TIMP could be useful to identify preterm infants who are likely to benefit from intervention.
참고문헌 (26)
- Bracewell M, "Patterns of motor disability in very preterm children", Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev, 8, pp.241~248 (2002)[DOI]
- Vaccarino FM, "Injury and repair in developing brain", Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 89, pp.F190~F192 (2004)[DOI]
- Wang CJ, "Quality-of-care indicators for the neurodevelopmental follow-up of very low birth weight children: results of an expert panel process", Pediatrics, 117, pp.2080~2092 (2006)[DOI]
- Rosenbaum P, "Variation and "abnormality": recognizing the differences", J Pediatr, 149, pp.593~594 (2006)[DOI]
- Johnson S, "Developmental screen or developmental testing?", Early Hum Dev, 82, pp.173~183 (2006)[DOI]
- Spittle AJ, "A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life", Dev Med Child Neurol, 50, pp.254~266 (2008)[DOI]
- Darrah J, "Intra-individual stability of rate of gross motor development in full-term infants", Early Hum Dev, 52, pp.169~179 (1998)[DOI]
- van Haastert IC, "Early gross motor development of preterm infants according to the Alberta Infant Motor Scale", J Pediatr, 149, pp.617~622 (2006)[DOI]
- Campbell SK, "Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for discriminating among infants with varying risk for poor motor outcome", J Pediatr, 139, pp.546~551 (2001)[DOI]
- Campbell SK, "Construct validity of the test of infant motor performance", Phys Ther, 75, pp.585~596 (1995)[DOI]
- Barbosa VM, "Comparison of test of infant motor performance (TIMP) item responses among children with cerebral palsy, developmental delay, and typical development", Am J Occup Ther, 59, pp.446~456 (2005)[DOI]
- Campbell SK, "Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale", Dev Med Child Neurol, 44, pp.263~272 (2002)[DOI]
- Kolobe TH, "Predicting motor outcome at preschool age for infants tested at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days after term age using the Test of Infant Motor Performance", Phys Ther, 84, pp.1144~1156 (2004)
- Einspieler C, "Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants" (2004), Mac Keith Press
- Bosanquet M, "A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children", Dev Med Child Neurol, 55, pp.418~426 (2013)[DOI]
- Spittle AJ, "Predicting motor development in very preterm infants at 12 months' corrected age: the role of qualitative magnetic resonance imaging and general movements assessments", Pediatrics, 123, pp.512~517 (2009)[DOI]
- Sustersic B, "General movements of preterm infants in relation to their motor competence between 5 and 6 years", Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 16, pp.724~729 (2012)[DOI]
- Piper MC, "Motor assessment of the developing infant" (1994), Saunders
- Jeng SF, "Alberta infant motor scale: reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan", Phys Ther, 80, pp.168~178 (2000)
- Majnemer A, "A comparison of developmental assessments of the newborn and young infant", Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev, 11, pp.68~73 (2005)[DOI]
- Snider L, "Prediction of motor and functional outcomes in infants born preterm assessed at term", Pediatr Phys Ther, 21, pp.2~11 (2009)[DOI]
- Snider LM, "A comparison of the general movements assessment with traditional approaches to newborn and infant assessment: concurrent validity", Early Hum Dev, 84, pp.297~303 (2008)[DOI]
- Noble Y, "Neonatal assessments for the preterm infant up to 4 months corrected age: a systematic review", Dev Med Child Neurol, 54, pp.129~139 (2012)[DOI]
- Spittle AJ, "Quality of general movements is related to white matter pathology in very preterm infants", Pediatrics, 121, pp.e1184~e1189 (2008)[DOI]
- Ferrari F, "Qualitative changes of general movements in preterm infants with brain lesions", Early Hum Dev, 23, pp.193~231 (1990)[DOI]
- Barbosa VM, "Longitudinal performance of infants with cerebral palsy on the Test of Infant Motor Performance and on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale", Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 23, pp.7~29 (2003)[DOI]