Ten-Year Follow-Up of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study in a Patient With Congenital Mirror Movements: A Case Report
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Most studies concerning congenital mirror movements (CMMs) have been focused on the motor organization in the distal hand muscles exclusively. To the best of our knowledge, there is no data on motor organization pattern of lower extremities, and a scarcity of data on the significance of forearm and arm muscles in CMMs. Here, we describe the case of a 19-year-old boy presenting mirror movements. In these terms, a 10-year transcranial magnetic stimulation study demonstrated that the motor organization pattern of the arm muscles was different from that of distal hand and forearm muscles even in the same upper extremity, and that the lower extremities showed the same pathways as healthy children. Moreover, in this case, an ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (MEPs) for distal hand muscles increased in amplitude with age, even though the intensity of mirror movements decreased. In the arm muscles, however, it was concluded that the contralateral MEPs increased in amplitude with age.
Abstract
Most studies concerning congenital mirror movements (CMMs) have been focused on the motor organization in the distal hand muscles exclusively. To the best of our knowledge, there is no data on motor organization pattern of lower extremities, and a scarcity of data on the significance of forearm and arm muscles in CMMs. Here, we describe the case of a 19-year-old boy presenting mirror movements. In these terms, a 10-year transcranial magnetic stimulation study demonstrated that the motor organization pattern of the arm muscles was different from that of distal hand and forearm muscles even in the same upper extremity, and that the lower extremities showed the same pathways as healthy children. Moreover, in this case, an ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (MEPs) for distal hand muscles increased in amplitude with age, even though the intensity of mirror movements decreased. In the arm muscles, however, it was concluded that the contralateral MEPs increased in amplitude with age.
참고문헌 (9)
- Maegaki Y, "Congenital mirror movement : a study of functional MRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation", Dev Med Child Neurol, 44, pp.838~843 (2002)
- 박성희, "선천성 거울상 운동 환자의 동측 비교차 피질척수 투사 - 증례 보고 -", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33(4), pp.502~505 (2009), 대한재활의학회
- Woods BT, "Mirror movements after childhood hemiparesis", Neurology, 28, pp.1152~1157 (1978)
- Srour M, "Mutations in DCC cause congenital mirror movements", Science, 328, pp.592~ (2010)
- Soon-Won Yook, "Motor Evoked Potentials of the Upper Extremities in Healthy Children", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(6), pp.759~764 (2011), 대한재활의학회
- 손수민, "양측 피질 기형을 동반한 환자의 동측 피질척수로-증례보고-", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 32(5), pp.582~585 (2008), 대한재활의학회
- Kang-Won Kim, "A Wide Spectrum of Axial Mesodermal Dysplasia Complex With Rhombencephalic Anomaly: A Case Report", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(1), pp.162~167 (2016), 대한재활의학회
- Finger JH, "The netrin 1 receptors Unc5h3 and Dcc are necessary at multiple choice points for the guidance of corticospinal tract axons", J Neurosci, 22, pp.10346~10356 (2002)
- Brandao P, "Congenital mirror movements: lack of decussation of pyramids", Brain, 137(Pt 8), pp.e292~ (2014)