Colonoscopy quality in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities in Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: High-quality colonoscopy is essential to reduce colorectal cancer-related deaths. Little is known about colonoscopy quality in non-academic practice settings. We aimed to evaluate the quality of colonoscopies performed in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities. Methods: Colonoscopy data were collected from patients referred to six tertiary care centers after receiving colonoscopies at community hospitals and nonhospital facilities. Based on their photographs, we measured quality indicators including cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, adequacy of bowel preparation, and number of polyps. Results: Data from a total of 1,064 colonoscopies were analyzed. The overall cecal intubation rate was 93.1%. The median withdrawal time was 8.3 minutes, but 31.3% of colonoscopies were withdrawn within 6 minutes. Community hospitals had longer withdrawal time and more polyps than nonhospital facilities (median withdrawal time: 9.9 minutes vs. 7.5 minutes, p < 0.001; mean number of polyps: 3.1 vs. 2.3, p = 0.001). Board-certified endoscopists had a higher rate of cecal intubation than non-board-certified endoscopists (93.2% vs. 85.2%, p = 0.006). A total of 819 follow-up colonoscopies were performed at referral centers with a median interval of 28 days. In total, 2,546 polyps were detected at baseline, and 1,088 were newly identified (polyp miss rate, 29.9%). Multivariable analysis revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.032; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.020 to 1.044) and male sex (OR, 1.719; 95% CI, 1.281 to 2.308) were associated with increased risk of missed polyps. Conclusions: The quality of colonoscopies performed in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities was suboptimal. Systematic reporting, auditing, and feedback are needed for quality improvement.
Abstract
Background/Aims: High-quality colonoscopy is essential to reduce colorectal cancer-related deaths. Little is known about colonoscopy quality in non-academic practice settings. We aimed to evaluate the quality of colonoscopies performed in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities. Methods: Colonoscopy data were collected from patients referred to six tertiary care centers after receiving colonoscopies at community hospitals and nonhospital facilities. Based on their photographs, we measured quality indicators including cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, adequacy of bowel preparation, and number of polyps. Results: Data from a total of 1,064 colonoscopies were analyzed. The overall cecal intubation rate was 93.1%. The median withdrawal time was 8.3 minutes, but 31.3% of colonoscopies were withdrawn within 6 minutes. Community hospitals had longer withdrawal time and more polyps than nonhospital facilities (median withdrawal time: 9.9 minutes vs. 7.5 minutes, p < 0.001; mean number of polyps: 3.1 vs. 2.3, p = 0.001). Board-certified endoscopists had a higher rate of cecal intubation than non-board-certified endoscopists (93.2% vs. 85.2%, p = 0.006). A total of 819 follow-up colonoscopies were performed at referral centers with a median interval of 28 days. In total, 2,546 polyps were detected at baseline, and 1,088 were newly identified (polyp miss rate, 29.9%). Multivariable analysis revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.032; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.020 to 1.044) and male sex (OR, 1.719; 95% CI, 1.281 to 2.308) were associated with increased risk of missed polyps. Conclusions: The quality of colonoscopies performed in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities was suboptimal. Systematic reporting, auditing, and feedback are needed for quality improvement.
참고문헌 (31)
- Torre LA, "Global cancer statistics, 2012", CA Cancer J Clin, 65, pp.87~108 (2015)
- Lauby-Secretan B, "The IARC perspective on colorectal cancer screening", N Engl J Med, 378, pp.1734~1740 (2018)
- Winawer SJ, "Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup", N Engl J Med, 329, pp.1977~1981 (1993)
- Zauber AG, "Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths", N Engl J Med, 366, pp.687~696 (2012)
- Dekker E, "Advances in CRC prevention : screening and surveillance", Gastroenterology, 154, pp.1970~1984 (2018)
- Heresbach D, "Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps : a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies", Endoscopy, 40, pp.284~290 (2008)
- Chen SC, "Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 102, pp.856~861 (2007)
- Pohl H, "Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection(CARE)study", Gastroenterology, 144, pp.74~80 (2013)
- Kaminski MF, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1795~1803 (2010)
- Rex DK, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.31~53 (2015)
- Jun Ki Min, "Revision of Quality Indicators for the Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea", Clinical Endoscopy, 51(3), pp.239~252 (2018), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Lai EJ, "The Boston bowel preparation scale : a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research", Gastrointest Endosc, 69(3 Pt 2), pp.620~625 (2009)
- Sang Bong Ahn, "The Miss Rate for Colorectal Adenoma Determined by Quality-Adjusted, Back-to-Back Colonoscopies", Gut and Liver, 6(1), pp.64~70 (2012), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
- Portillo I, "Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT : quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type", Endosc Int Open, 6, pp.E1149~E1156 (2018)
- Inra JA, "Comparison of colonoscopy quality measures across various practice settings and the impact of performance scorecards", Dig Dis Sci, 62, pp.894~902 (2017)
- Hanefeld J, "Understanding and measuring quality of care : dealing with complexity", Bull World Health Organ, 95, pp.368~374 (2017)
- "Insurance benefit costs" (2011)[URL]
- Meester RG, "Variation in adenoma detection rate and the lifetime benefits and cost of colorectal cancer screening : a microsimulation model", JAMA, 313, pp.2349~2358 (2015)
- Adler A, "Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy : a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12, 134examinations(Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3)", Gut, 62, pp.236~241 (2013)
- Pace D, "Effect of colonoscopy volume on quality indicators", Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, pp.2580894~ (2016)
- Jae Ho Choi, "The current capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea", Intestinal research, 17(1), pp.119~126 (2019), 대한장연구학회[DOI]
- Singh S, "Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Am J Gastroenterol, 109, pp.1375~1389 (2014)
- le Clercq CM, "Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable : a population-based study", Gut, 63, pp.957~963 (2014)
- Baxter NN, "Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer", Gastroenterology, 140, pp.65~72 (2011)
- 문희석, "Education and Training Guidelines for the Board of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy", Clinical Endoscopy, 50(4), pp.345~356 (2017), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Yoo KY, "Cancer control activities in the Republic of Korea", Jpn J Clin Oncol, 38, pp.327~333 (2008)
- Paszat L, "Repeat colonoscopy within 6 months after initial outpatient colonoscopy in Ontario : a population-based cross-sectional study", Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, pp.5917057~ (2017)
- Bryan Dowd, "Medicare’s Physician Quality Reporting Beneficiary Attribution", Medicare & Medicaid Research Review, 4(2), pp.E1~E14 (2014), Office of Research, Development and Information (ORDI)[DOI]
- Idigoras I, "Evaluation of the colorectal cancer screening Programme in the Basque Country(Spain)and its effectiveness based on the Miscan-colon model", BMC Public Health, 18, pp.78~ (2017)
- Hadlock SD, "The quality of colonoscopy reporting in usual practice: are endoscopists reporting key data elements?", Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, pp.1929361~ (2016)
- Webster F, "How to make feedback more effective? Qualitative findings from pilot testing of an audit and feedback report for endoscopists", Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, pp.4983790~ (2016)