본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Continuous measurement of quality indicators (QIs) should be a routine part of colonoscopy, as a wide variation still exists in the performanceand quality levels of colonoscopy in Korea. Among the many QIs of colonoscopy, the adenoma detection rate, average withdrawaltime, bowel preparation adequacy, and cecal intubation rate should be monitored in daily clinical practice to improve the qualityof the procedure. The adenoma detection rate is the best indicator of the quality of colonoscopy; however, it has many limitations foruniversal use in daily practice. With the development of natural language processing, the adenoma detection rate is expected to becomemore effective and useful. It is important that colonoscopists do not strictly and mechanically maintain an average withdrawal time of 6minutes but instead perform careful colonoscopy to maximally expose the colonic mucosa with a withdrawal time of at least 6 minutes. To achieve adequate bowel preparation, documentation of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) shouldbe a routine part of colonoscopy. When colonoscopists routinely followed the bowel preparation protocols, ≥85% of outpatient screeningcolonoscopies had a BBPS score of ≥6. In addition, the cecal intubation rate should be ≥95% of all screening colonoscopies. Thefirst step in improving colonoscopy quality in Korea is to apply these key performance measurements in clinical practice.

Abstract

Continuous measurement of quality indicators (QIs) should be a routine part of colonoscopy, as a wide variation still exists in the performanceand quality levels of colonoscopy in Korea. Among the many QIs of colonoscopy, the adenoma detection rate, average withdrawaltime, bowel preparation adequacy, and cecal intubation rate should be monitored in daily clinical practice to improve the qualityof the procedure. The adenoma detection rate is the best indicator of the quality of colonoscopy; however, it has many limitations foruniversal use in daily practice. With the development of natural language processing, the adenoma detection rate is expected to becomemore effective and useful. It is important that colonoscopists do not strictly and mechanically maintain an average withdrawal time of 6minutes but instead perform careful colonoscopy to maximally expose the colonic mucosa with a withdrawal time of at least 6 minutes. To achieve adequate bowel preparation, documentation of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) shouldbe a routine part of colonoscopy. When colonoscopists routinely followed the bowel preparation protocols, ≥85% of outpatient screeningcolonoscopies had a BBPS score of ≥6. In addition, the cecal intubation rate should be ≥95% of all screening colonoscopies. Thefirst step in improving colonoscopy quality in Korea is to apply these key performance measurements in clinical practice.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Martin CS Wong, "Prevalence and risk factors of colorectal cancer in Asia", Intestinal research, 17(3), pp.317~329 (2019), 대한장연구학회[DOI]
  2. Winawer SJ, "Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup", N Engl J Med, 329, pp.1977~1981 (1993)
  3. Zauber AG, "Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths", N Engl J Med, 366, pp.687~696 (2012)
  4. van Rijn JC, "Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy : a systematic review", Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp.343~350 (2006)
  5. Pickhardt PJ, "Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy", Ann Intern Med, 141, pp.352~359 (2004)
  6. Heresbach D, "Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps : a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies", Endoscopy, 40, pp.284~290 (2008)
  7. Sang Bong Ahn, "The Miss Rate for Colorectal Adenoma Determined by Quality-Adjusted, Back-to-Back Colonoscopies", Gut and Liver, 6(1), pp.64~70 (2012), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
  8. Chen SC, "Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 102, pp.856~861 (2007)
  9. Hetzel JT, "Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort", Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp.2656~2664 (2010)
  10. Rex DK, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 110, pp.72~90 (2015)
  11. Keswani RN, "AGA clinical practice update on strategies to improve quality of screening and surveillance colonoscopy : expert review", Gastroenterology, 161, pp.701~711 (2021)
  12. Sanaka MR, "Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates : variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist", Dis Colon Rectum, 57, pp.1113~1119 (2014)
  13. Kaminski MF, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1795~1803 (2010)
  14. Corley DA, "Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death", N Engl J Med, 370, pp.1298~1306 (2014)
  15. Aniwan S, "The secondary quality indicator to improve prediction of adenoma miss rate apart from adenoma detection rate", Am J Gastroenterol, 111, pp.723~729 (2016)
  16. BoroffES, "Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon", Am J Gastroenterol, 108, pp.993~999 (2013)
  17. Imler TD, "Multi-center colonoscopy quality measurement utilizing natural language processing", Am J Gastroenterol, 110, pp.543~552 (2015)
  18. Mehrotra A, "Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.1233~1239 (2012)
  19. Raju GS, "Natural language processing as an alternative to manual reporting of colonoscopy quality metrics", Gastrointest Endosc, 82, pp.512~519 (2015)
  20. Park SK, "Comparison of adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy as a quality indicator of colonoscopy", Scand J Gastroenterol, 51, pp.886~890 (2016)
  21. Do A, "Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume", Gastrointest Endosc, 77, pp.376~380 (2013)
  22. Robertson DJ, "Recommendations on fecal immunochemical testing to screen for colorectal neoplasia : a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer", Gastrointest Endosc, 85, pp.2~21 (2017)
  23. Yoon JY, "An adjusted level of adenoma detection rate is necessary for adults below 50 years old", J Clin Gastroenterol, 52, pp.703~708 (2018)
  24. Barclay RL, "Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy", N Engl J Med, 355, pp.2533~2541 (2006)
  25. Chaptini L, "Can I improve my adenoma detection rate?", J Clin Gastroenterol, 49, pp.270~281 (2015)
  26. Shaukat A, "Longer withdrawal time is associated with a reduced incidence of interval cancer after screening colonoscopy", Gastroenterology, 149, pp.952~957 (2015)
  27. Barclay RL, "Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 6, pp.1091~1098 (2008)
  28. Vavricka SR, "Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists", Endoscopy, 48, pp.256~262 (2016)
  29. Kaminski MF, "Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy : a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)quality improvement initiative", United European Gastroenterol J, 5, pp.309~334 (2017)
  30. Butterly L, "Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time : results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry", Am J Gastroenterol, 109, pp.417~426 (2014)
  31. Moritz V, "Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy : a nationwide analysis", Endoscopy, 44, pp.476~481 (2012)
  32. Jung Y, "Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma", polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments : a KASID multicenter study, 2019, pp.89, 523~530
  33. Bianco MA, "Prevalence of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia : an Italian multicenter observational study", Endoscopy, 42, pp.279~285 (2010)
  34. Munoz Garcia-Borruel M, "Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: characteristics and predictive factors", Med Clin(Barc), 150, pp.1~7 (2018)
  35. Rex DK, "Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy : recommendations of the U. S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer", Am J Gastroenterol, 97, pp.1296~1308 (2002)
  36. Larsen M, "The impact of the quality of colon preparation on follow-up colonoscopy recommendations", Am J Gastroenterol, 106, pp.2058~2062 (2011)
  37. Calderwood AH, "Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale", Gastrointest Endosc, 72, pp.686~692 (2010)
  38. Clark BT, "What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy : systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate", Am J Gastroenterol, 109, pp.1714~1723 (2014)
  39. Johnson DA, "Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy : recommendations from the U. S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer", Gastrointest Endosc, 80, pp.543~562 (2014)
  40. Clark BT, "Quantification of adequate bowel preparation for screening or surveillance colonoscopy in men", Gastroenterology, 150, pp.396~405 (2016)
  41. Kilgore TW, "Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.1240~1245 (2011)
  42. Jeeyeon Kim, "Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study", Intestinal research, 17(3), pp.413~418 (2019), 대한장연구학회[DOI]
  43. 신성현, "Oral Sulfate Solution is as Effective as 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid", Clinical Endoscopy, 53(5), pp.503~504 (2020), 대한소화기내시경학회[DOI]
  44. Hassan C, "Bowel preparation for colonoscopy : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)guideline", Endoscopy, 45, pp.142~150 (2013)
  45. Dae Hyung Woo, "Prospective analysis of factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in actual clinical practice", Intestinal research, 16(2), pp.293~298 (2018), 대한장연구학회
  46. Lee TJ, "Colonoscopy quality measures : experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme", Gut, 61, pp.1050~1057 (2012)
  47. Baxter NN, "Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer", Gastroenterology, 140, pp.65~72 (2011)
  48. Rex DK, "Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, pp.879~883 (2007)
  49. 박상현, "Colon Polyp Detection in Primary Health Care Institutions of Korea: Detection Rate and Issues with Following the Guidelines", 대한소화기학회지, 78(6), pp.328~336 (2021), 대한소화기학회[DOI]
  50. Kim DH, "The usefulness of colonoscopy as a screening test for detecting colorectal polyps", Hepatogastroenterology, 54, pp.2240~2242 (2007)
  51. Jae Ho Choi, "The current capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea", Intestinal research, 17(1), pp.119~126 (2019), 대한장연구학회[DOI]
  52. Bretthauer M, "Population-based colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer : a randomized clinical trial", JAMA Intern Med, 176, pp.894~902 (2016)
  53. Jin Young Yoon, "Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening", Intestinal research, 16(1), pp.48~54 (2018), 대한장연구학회

관련 논문AI추천

Colonoscopy quality in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities in Korea이재곤, Chang Soo Eun, Dae-Seong Myung, Dong Il Park, Dong Soo Han, Eun Soo Kim, Joon Seok Yoon, Seul Ki Kim, Won Hyun Lee, Young-Eun Joo, Yunho Jung대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2021 · 제36권 제1호Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer김은란, Joo Hye Song대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2024 · 제39권 제4호Colonoscopy Quality and Strategies for ImprovementLadabaum Uri, Lee Hyun Jung거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2026 · 제20권 제1호Clinical significance of computer-aided quality assessment systems in colonoscopy: a comprehensive reviewKatsuro Ichimasa, Khay Guan Yeoh, Masashi Misawa, Shin-Ei Kudo, Taishi Okumura, Wai Phyo Lwin, Yasuharu Maeda, Yuta Kouyama, Yutaro Ide대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2025 · 제58권 제5호Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study곽민섭, 김현건, 신정은, 전성란, 차재명, Ahn Eu Mi, Cho Young-Seok, Han Jae Hee, Jung Yunho, Park Suyeon, Shin Hyun Deok거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2022 · 제16권 제5호Revision of Quality Indicators for the Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program of the National Cancer Screening Program in KoreaJae Myung Cha, Jeong Seop Moon, Jie-Hyun Kim, Jin Oh Kim, Jong Pil Im, Jun Ki Min, Soon Man Yoon, Yoon Tae Jeen, Yu Kyung Cho, Yunho Jung대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2018 · 제51권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)