Inter-rater Agreement for the Clinical Dysphagia Scale
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To investigate the inter-rater agreement for the clinical dysphagia scale (CDS). Method Sixty-seven subjects scheduled to participate in a video-fl uoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) were preexamined by two raters independently within a 24-hour interval. Each item and the total score were compared between the raters. In addition, we investigated whether subtraction of items showing low agreement or modifi cation of rating methods could enhance inter-rater agreement without signifi cant compromise of validity. Results Inter-rater agreement was excellent for the total score (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.886). Four items (lip sealing, chewing and mastication, laryngeal elevation, and reflex coughing) did not show excellent agreement (ICC: 0.696, 0.377, 0.446, and κ: 0.723, respectively). However, subtraction of each item either compromised validity, or did not improve agreement. When redefi ning ‘history of aspiration’ and ‘lesion location’ items, the inter-rater agreement (ICC: 0.912, 0.888, respectively) and correlation with new videofluoroscopic dysphagia score (PCC: 0.576, 0.577, respectively) were enhanced. The CDS showed better agreement and validity in stroke patients compared to non-stroke patients (ICC: 0.917 vs 0.835, PCC: 0.663 vs 0.414). Conclusion The clinical dysphagia scale is a reliable bedside swallowing test. We can improve inter-rater agreement and validity by refining the ‘history of aspiration’ and ‘lesion location’ item.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the inter-rater agreement for the clinical dysphagia scale (CDS). Method Sixty-seven subjects scheduled to participate in a video-fl uoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) were preexamined by two raters independently within a 24-hour interval. Each item and the total score were compared between the raters. In addition, we investigated whether subtraction of items showing low agreement or modifi cation of rating methods could enhance inter-rater agreement without signifi cant compromise of validity. Results Inter-rater agreement was excellent for the total score (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.886). Four items (lip sealing, chewing and mastication, laryngeal elevation, and reflex coughing) did not show excellent agreement (ICC: 0.696, 0.377, 0.446, and κ: 0.723, respectively). However, subtraction of each item either compromised validity, or did not improve agreement. When redefi ning ‘history of aspiration’ and ‘lesion location’ items, the inter-rater agreement (ICC: 0.912, 0.888, respectively) and correlation with new videofluoroscopic dysphagia score (PCC: 0.576, 0.577, respectively) were enhanced. The CDS showed better agreement and validity in stroke patients compared to non-stroke patients (ICC: 0.917 vs 0.835, PCC: 0.663 vs 0.414). Conclusion The clinical dysphagia scale is a reliable bedside swallowing test. We can improve inter-rater agreement and validity by refining the ‘history of aspiration’ and ‘lesion location’ item.
참고문헌 (22)
- Cook IJ, "Timing of videofluoroscopic, manometric events, and bolus transit during the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing", Dysphagia, 4, pp.8~15 (1989)
- Perlman AL, "Electromyographic activity from human laryngeal, pharyngeal, and submental muscles during swallowing", J Appl Physiol, 86, pp.1663~1669 (1999)
- Koivula I, "Risk factors for pneumonia in the elderly", Am J Med, 96, pp.313~320 (1994)
- Niederman MS, "Th e cost of treating community-acquired pneumonia", Clin Th er, 20, pp.820~837 (1998)
- Trapl M, "Dysphagia bedside screening for acute-stroke patients: the Gugging Swallowing Screen", Stroke, 38, pp.2948~2952 (2007)
- Martino R, "The Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test (TOR-BSST): development and validation of a dysphagia screening tool for patients with stroke", Stroke, 40, pp.555~561 (2009)
- Bates B, "Veterans Affairs", Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: executive summary, 2005, pp.36, 2049~2056
- Duncan PW, "Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: a clinical practice guideline", Stroke, 36, pp.e100~e143 (2005)
- Han TR, "The clinical functional scale for dysphagia in stroke patients", Korean J Sroke, 3, pp.153~157 (2001)
- 정세희, "비디오 투시 연하 검사에 근거한 연하곤란 임상 척도의 타당도 평가", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 29(4), pp.343~350 (2005), 대한재활의학회
- 박진우, "The prediction of persistent dysphagia beyond six months after stroke", DYSPHAGIA, 23, pp.59~64 (2008), SPRINGER
- 백남종, "비디오 투시 연하 검사에 기초한 기능적 연하곤란 척도의 임상적 타당도", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 29(1), pp.43~49 (2005), 대한재활의학회
- Shrout PE, "Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability", Psychol Bull, 86, pp.420~428 (1979)
- Fleiss JL, "Th e equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coeffi cient as measures of reliability", Educ Psychol Meas, 33, pp.613~619 (1973)
- Fleiss JL, "Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters", Psychol Bull, 86, pp.974~977 (1979)
- Splaingard ML, "Aspiration in rehabilitation patients: videofl uoroscopy vs bedside clinical assessment", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 69, pp.637~640 (1988)
- DePippo KL, "Validation of the 3-oz water swallow test for aspiration following stroke", Arch Neurol, 49, pp.1259~1261 (1992)
- DePippo KL, "The Burke dysphagia screening test: validation of its use in patients with stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75, pp.1284~1286 (1994)
- Smithard DG, "Can bedside assessment reliably exclude aspiration following acute stroke?", Age Ageing, 27, pp.99~106 (1998)
- Hinds NP, "Assessment of swallowing and referral to speech and language therapists in acute stroke", QJM, 91, pp.829~835 (1998)
- Mann G, "Swallowing function after stroke: prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months", Stroke, 30, pp.744~748 (1999)
- Kruger E, "The rehabilitation of patients recovering from brainstem strokes: case studies and clinical considerations", Top Stroke Rehabil, 14, pp.56~64 (2007)