Adding Endoscopist-Directed Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing to the Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study Increased the Detection Rates of Penetration, Aspiration, and Pharyngeal Residue
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Currently, the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) is the standard tool for evaluating dysphagia. We evaluated whether the addition of endoscopist-directed flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) to VFSS could improve the detection rates of penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue, compared the diagnostic efficacy between VFSS and endoscopist-directed FEES and assessed the adverse events of the FEES. Methods: In single tertiary referral center, a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. Fifty consecutive patients suspected of oropharyngeal dysphagia were enrolled in this study between January 2012 and July 2012. Results: The agreement in the detection of penetration and aspiration between VFSS and FEES of viscous food (κ=0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.53) and liquid food (κ=0.22; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.42) was “fair.” The agreement in the detection of pharyngeal residue between the two tests was “substantial” with viscous food (κ=0.63; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.94) and “fair” with liquid food (κ=0.37; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.63). Adding FEES to VFSS significantly increased the detection rates of penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue. No severe adverse events were noted during FEES, except for two cases of epistaxis, which stopped spontaneously without requiring any packing. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the addition of endoscopist-directed FEES to VFSS increased the detection rates of penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Currently, the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) is the standard tool for evaluating dysphagia. We evaluated whether the addition of endoscopist-directed flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) to VFSS could improve the detection rates of penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue, compared the diagnostic efficacy between VFSS and endoscopist-directed FEES and assessed the adverse events of the FEES. Methods: In single tertiary referral center, a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. Fifty consecutive patients suspected of oropharyngeal dysphagia were enrolled in this study between January 2012 and July 2012. Results: The agreement in the detection of penetration and aspiration between VFSS and FEES of viscous food (κ=0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.53) and liquid food (κ=0.22; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.42) was “fair.” The agreement in the detection of pharyngeal residue between the two tests was “substantial” with viscous food (κ=0.63; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.94) and “fair” with liquid food (κ=0.37; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.63). Adding FEES to VFSS significantly increased the detection rates of penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue. No severe adverse events were noted during FEES, except for two cases of epistaxis, which stopped spontaneously without requiring any packing. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the addition of endoscopist-directed FEES to VFSS increased the detection rates of penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue.
참고문헌 (26)
- Guyomard V, "Effect of dysphasia and dysphagia on inpatient mortality and hospital length of stay: a database study", J Am Geriatr Soc, 57, pp.2101~2106 (2009)
- Johnson ER, "Aspiration pneumonia in stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, pp.973~976 (1993)
- Martin BJ, "The association of swallowing dysfunction and aspiration pneumonia", Dysphagia, 9, pp.1~6 (1994)
- Schmidt J, "Videofluoroscopic evidence of aspiration predicts pneumonia and death but not dehydration following stroke", Dysphagia, 9, pp.7~11 (1994)
- Logemann JA, "Impact of the diagnostic procedure on outcome measures of swallowing rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients", Dysphagia, 7, pp.179~186 (1992)
- Martin-Harris B, "The videofluorographic swallowing study", Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 19, pp.769~785 (2008)
- McCullough GH, "Inter- and intrajudge reliability for videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation measures", Dysphagia, 16, pp.110~118 (2001)
- Langmore SE, "Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure", Dysphagia, 2, pp.216~219 (1988)
- Leder SB, "Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing", Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 19, pp.787~801 (2008)
- Warnecke T, "Towards a basic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in acute stroke: identification of salient findings by the inexperienced examiner", BMC Med Educ, 9, pp.13~ (2009)
- Kelly AM, "Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare?", Laryngoscope, 117, pp.1723~1727 (2007)
- Kelly AM, "Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity?", Clin Otolaryngol, 31, pp.425~432 (2006)
- Rosenbek JC, "A penetration-aspiration scale", Dysphagia, 11, pp.93~98 (1996)
- Perlman AL, "Videofluoroscopic predictors of aspiration in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia", Dysphagia, 9, pp.90~95 (1994)
- Langmore SE, "Endoscopic evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders", pp.101~143 (2001), Thieme
- Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data", Biometrics, 33, pp.159~174 (1977)
- Bennett BM, "On comparisons of sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of a number of diagnostic procedures", Biometrics, 28, pp.793~800 (1972)
- Kaye GM, "Role of flexible laryngoscopy in evaluating aspiration", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 106, pp.705~709 (1997)
- Leder SB, "Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of dysphagia to identify silent aspiration", Dysphagia, 13, pp.19~21 (1998)
- Périé S, "Role of videoendoscopy in assessment of pharyngeal function in oropharyngeal dysphagia: comparison with videofluoroscopy and manometry", Laryngoscope, 108, pp.1712~1716 (1998)
- Wu CH, "Evaluation of swallowing safety with fiberoptic endoscope: comparison with videofluoroscopic technique", Laryngoscope, 107, pp.396~401 (1997)
- Giraldo LF, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) for the diagnosis of oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 187, pp.A5678~ (2013)
- Aviv JE, "The safety of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST): an analysis of 500 consecutive evaluations", Dysphagia, 15, pp.39~44 (2000)
- Aviv JE, "Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing: patient characteristics and analysis of safety in 1,340 consecutive examinations", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 114, pp.173~176 (2005)
- Castell DO, "Evaluation of dysphagia: a careful history is crucial", Dysphagia, 2, pp.65~71 (1987)
- Lind CD, "Dysphagia: evaluation and treatment", Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 32, pp.553~575 (2003)