월정사 탑돌이의 실상과 전승과제
The Reality and Transmission Tasks of Circling the Pagoda of Woljeongsa
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Among the cultural heritage, intangible heritages are already gone or in danger of disappearing, and circling the pagoda is one of them. Currently, there are only two places for circling the pagoda in the country. Among them, circling the pagoda, which is relatively well transmitted, remains almost the only circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa. The purpose of this paper was to explore and direct how circling the pagoda in such a crisis could be firmly established as a traditional cultural heritage. This paper was created by closely observing the site where circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa was carried out in keeping with the field‐oriented attitude of focusing on the field of folklore. First, this paper examined the origins and significance of circling the pagoda, which is believed to have originated in Buddhism. The center of circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa is the Woljeongsa pagoda. By identifying the nature of the octagonal 9‐storied pagoda of Woljeongsa, this paper attempted to discover the driving force for the power of transmitting circling the pagoda. Circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa suggests that a hedge of the designation of cultural property is necessary for the future to be handed down with vitality. It is important to restore the original shape of circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa, but I think ecological creativity is necessary for festivization, contentization, and globalization strategies. Fortunately, Woljeongsa is the only circling the pagoda that has been endeavoring to preserve and pass on the culture of Buddhist temples and believers. The task remaining to be done is to have circling the pagoda, which traditionally existed, be interested in continuing the cycle without external interference. If the means for circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa is designated as cultural property, the designation of cultural property should also be considered. The most important problem, however, is that the designation of circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa as a nation’s cultural asset can be an external interference and is a dependence stance. Therefore, it is important to recognize that common people participating in circling the pagoda are creative and voluntary as a culture transferee.
Abstract
Among the cultural heritage, intangible heritages are already gone or in danger of disappearing, and circling the pagoda is one of them. Currently, there are only two places for circling the pagoda in the country. Among them, circling the pagoda, which is relatively well transmitted, remains almost the only circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa. The purpose of this paper was to explore and direct how circling the pagoda in such a crisis could be firmly established as a traditional cultural heritage. This paper was created by closely observing the site where circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa was carried out in keeping with the field‐oriented attitude of focusing on the field of folklore. First, this paper examined the origins and significance of circling the pagoda, which is believed to have originated in Buddhism. The center of circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa is the Woljeongsa pagoda. By identifying the nature of the octagonal 9‐storied pagoda of Woljeongsa, this paper attempted to discover the driving force for the power of transmitting circling the pagoda. Circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa suggests that a hedge of the designation of cultural property is necessary for the future to be handed down with vitality. It is important to restore the original shape of circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa, but I think ecological creativity is necessary for festivization, contentization, and globalization strategies. Fortunately, Woljeongsa is the only circling the pagoda that has been endeavoring to preserve and pass on the culture of Buddhist temples and believers. The task remaining to be done is to have circling the pagoda, which traditionally existed, be interested in continuing the cycle without external interference. If the means for circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa is designated as cultural property, the designation of cultural property should also be considered. The most important problem, however, is that the designation of circling the pagoda of Woljeongsa as a nation’s cultural asset can be an external interference and is a dependence stance. Therefore, it is important to recognize that common people participating in circling the pagoda are creative and voluntary as a culture transferee.
참고문헌 (39)
- "묘법연화경", ~
- "금광명경", ~
- "방등경", ~
- "화엄경", ~
- "한국대장경", ~
- "한국불교대사전", ~
- "불교대사전", ~
- "삼국유사", ~
- "고려사", ~
- 康炳喜, "韓國의 多角多層 石塔", 박사, 한국예술민속사, pp.1996
- 강순형, "월정사8각 9층석탑의 재조명" (2000), 월정사성보박물관
- 강우방, "한국 미의 재발견 5.탑" (2003), 솔출판사
- 곽철환, "불교길라잡이" (1998), 시공사
- 국립문화재연구소, "불교민속놀이" (2002)
- 무형문화유산자원조사연구, "국립문화재연구소", ~ (2012)
- 국립민속박물관, "한국민속신앙사전" (2012)
- 김용덕, "연등회의 문화재적 가치와 한중일 연등축제의 비교" (2009), 대한불교 조계종 총무원문화부, 한국민속학회
- 김준오, "탑돌이 유형과 민속적 전개", 남도민속연구, (22), pp.31~74 (2011), 남도민속학회
- 김현준, "사찰,그속에 깃든의미" (1991), 교보문고
- 문명대, "한국불교미술의 형식1" (1999), 한언
- 민지, "조선불교통사 하권"
- 박동석, "문화재보호법" (2005), 민속원
- 박종천, "월정사 탑돌이의 불교문화콘텐츠 개발 및 활용방안에 대한 논평", 2010월정사박물관학술세미나 (2010), 월정사
- 스태판M.크라우스, "무형유산의 가치와 지속가능한 발전", ICH COURIER-아태무형유산꾸리에, 16, pp.16~ (2013)
- 신동하, "신라오대산신앙의 구조", 인문과학연구, 3 (1997), 상명대
- 신하순, "통도사 연산전의 다보탑벽화에 관한 소고", 경성대학교문화전통논집, (1) (2003), 경성대한국학연구소
- 심효섭, "월정사 탑돌이의 구성과 발전방향", 월정사탑돌이 원형복원을 위한 학술세미나 (2010)
- 월정사, "월정사 탑돌이 해설", ~ (2010)
- 이재수, "월정사 탑돌이의 불교문화콘텐츠 개발 및 활용방안", 2010월정사박물관학술세미나 (2010), 월정사
- 이채원, "국립문화재연구소 무형문화유산 조사 사례", 불교무형문화유산 보호, 2013, ~[DOI]
- 정각, "한국불교의 의례1" (2001), 운주사
- 정신문화연구원, "한국민족문화대백과사전" (1992), 웅진출판주식회사
- 정영호, "월정사 팔각구층 석탑의 재조명" (2000), 월정사성보박물관
- 진철승, "한국세시풍속사전(여름편)" (2005), 국립민속박물관
- 최인학, "한국축제의 이론과 실제" (2000), 월인
- 한국불교연구원, "월정사" (1981), 일지사
- 법주사탑돌이, "홍윤식", 문화재관리국, ~, pp.무형문화재보고서 제 103호 (1972)
- 홍윤식, "오대산의 불교문화와 월정사 탑돌이의 역사", 월정사 탑돌이 원형복원을 위한 학술 세미나 (2010), 월정사
- "Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage"[URL]
