Early Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Is It Worth the Risk?
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To compare the outcomes of a 6-month-long accelerated rehabilitation with a 12-month-long rehabilitation. There is no consensus on the optimal duration of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Trends in the past decades have shifted towards accelerated programs, often resulting in a return to play (RTP) at 4–6 months, postoperatively. However, longer rehabilitation cycles have recently experienced renaissance due to a greater understanding of graft remodeling. Methods Adult athletes who underwent ACLR between 2015 and 2018 by the same surgeon were included and followed-up prospectively for 24 months. Participants were allocated into two groups based on their RTP (6 months vs. 12 months) and compared with graft elongation, reoperation rate, and sports career (quit or continue) outcomes. Results Fifty-four patients underwent accelerated rehabilitation and 92 completed conventional rehabilitation. The accelerated rehabilitation was significantly associated with graft elongation—the accelerated rehabilitation group (n=9) and the conventional rehabilitation group (n=0), p<0.001—and need for reoperation—the accelerated rehabilitation group (n=5) and the conventional rehabilitation group (n=1), p=0.026. Although the relationship between rehabilitation time and quitting competitive sports did not reach significance at 0.05 level (p=0.063), it was significant when p<0.1, thereby showing a clear trend. Conclusion Accelerated rehabilitation increased graft elongation risk. Knee laxity ≥3 mm measured at 6 months after ACLR should be accompanied by RTP time frame re-evaluation. Arthrometry checkups or routine magnetic resonance imaging shortly after RTP may be considered in cases of accelerated rehabilitation.
Abstract
Objective To compare the outcomes of a 6-month-long accelerated rehabilitation with a 12-month-long rehabilitation. There is no consensus on the optimal duration of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Trends in the past decades have shifted towards accelerated programs, often resulting in a return to play (RTP) at 4–6 months, postoperatively. However, longer rehabilitation cycles have recently experienced renaissance due to a greater understanding of graft remodeling. Methods Adult athletes who underwent ACLR between 2015 and 2018 by the same surgeon were included and followed-up prospectively for 24 months. Participants were allocated into two groups based on their RTP (6 months vs. 12 months) and compared with graft elongation, reoperation rate, and sports career (quit or continue) outcomes. Results Fifty-four patients underwent accelerated rehabilitation and 92 completed conventional rehabilitation. The accelerated rehabilitation was significantly associated with graft elongation—the accelerated rehabilitation group (n=9) and the conventional rehabilitation group (n=0), p<0.001—and need for reoperation—the accelerated rehabilitation group (n=5) and the conventional rehabilitation group (n=1), p=0.026. Although the relationship between rehabilitation time and quitting competitive sports did not reach significance at 0.05 level (p=0.063), it was significant when p<0.1, thereby showing a clear trend. Conclusion Accelerated rehabilitation increased graft elongation risk. Knee laxity ≥3 mm measured at 6 months after ACLR should be accompanied by RTP time frame re-evaluation. Arthrometry checkups or routine magnetic resonance imaging shortly after RTP may be considered in cases of accelerated rehabilitation.
참고문헌 (35)
- Paschos NK, "Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : principles of treatment", EFORT Open Rev, 1, pp.398~408 (2017)
- Brandl G, "Bone-on-bone anatomic patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a reproducible technique combining press-fit and extracortical fixation", Arthrosc Tech, 9, pp.e205~e212 (2020)
- Iio K, "Characteristics of elongated and ruptured anterior cruciate ligament grafts : an analysis of 21 consecutive revision cases", Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol, 8, pp.1~7 (2017)
- Sanders TL, "Long-term rate of graft failure after ACL reconstruction : a geographic population cohort analysis", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 25, pp.222~228 (2017)
- Raines BT, "Management of anterior cruciate ligament injury : what’s in and what’s out?", Indian J Orthop, 51, pp.563~575 (2017)
- Samitier G, "Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Arch Bone Jt Surg, 3, pp.220~240 (2015)
- Ellman MB, "Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 23, pp.283~296 (2015)
- Flagg KY, "Current criteria for return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : an evidence-based literature review", Ann Transl Med, 7(Suppl 7), pp.S252~ (2019)
- Menetrey J, ""Biological failure"of the anterior cruciate ligament graft", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 16, pp.224~231 (2008)
- Mayr HO, "Histomorphological alterations of human anterior cruciate ligament grafts during mid-term and long-term remodeling", Orthop Surg, 13, pp.314~320 (2021)
- American College of Surgeons, Committee on Trauma, "Resources for optimal care of the injured", pp.16~23 (2014), American College of Surgeons
- Soto JM, "An overview of the American trauma system", Chin J Traumatol, 21, pp.77~79 (2018)
- van Melick N, "Evidence-based clinical practice update : practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus", Br J Sports Med, 50, pp.1506~1515 (2016)
- Malfait F, "The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes", Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet, 175, pp.8~26 (2017)
- Grassi A, "Magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a practical guide", World J Orthop, 7, pp.638~649 (2016)
- Kamien PM, "Age, graft size, and Tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft", Am J Sports Med, 41, pp.1808~1812 (2013)
- Kaeding CC, "Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : predictors of failure from a MOON prospective longitudinal cohort", Sports Health, 3, pp.73~81 (2011)
- Noailles T, "Incidence and risk factors for cyclops syndrome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a systematic literature review", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 105, pp.1401~1405 (2019)
- Decarlo MS, "Traditional versus accelerated rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction : a one-year follow-up", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 15, pp.309~316 (1992)
- Zaffagnini S, "Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: how, when and why? A narrative review of current evidence", Joints, 3, pp.25~30 (2015)
- Risberg MA, "The long-term effect of 2 postoperative rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years of follow-up", Am J Sports Med, 37, pp.1958~1966 (2009)
- Wiggins AJ, "Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Am J Sports Med, 44, pp.1861~1876 (2016)
- Beynnon BD, "Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of programs administered over 2 different time intervals", Am J Sports Med, 33, pp.347~359 (2005)
- Magnussen RA, "Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft", Arthroscopy, 28, pp.526~531 (2012)
- Beynnon BD, "The science of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (402), pp.9~20 (2002)
- Arnoczky SP, "Biology of ACL reconstructions : what happens to the graft?", Instr Course Lect, 45, pp.229~233 (1996)
- Raoul T, "Are athletes able to resume sport at six-month mean follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Prospective functional and psychological assessment from the French Anterior Cruciate Ligament Study (FAST) cohort", Knee, 26, pp.155~164 (2019)
- Marumo K, "The"ligamentization"process in human anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar and hamstring tendons : a biochemical study", Am J Sports Med, 33, pp.1166~1173 (2005)
- Maletis GB, "Agerelated risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a cohort study of 21, 304 patients from the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Registry", Am J Sports Med, 44, pp.331~336 (2016)
- Sutherland K, "Risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and frequency with which patients change surgeons", Orthop J Sports Med, 7, pp.2325967119880487~ (2019)
- Snaebjornsson T, "Young age and high BMI are predictors of early revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a cohort study from the Swedish and Norwegian knee ligament registries based on 30, 747 patients", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 27, pp.3583~3591 (2019)
- Parkinson B, "Factors that predict failure in anatomic singlebundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Am J Sports Med, 45, pp.1529~1536 (2017)
- Inderhaug E, "No effect of graft size or body mass index on risk of revision after ACL reconstruction using hamstrings autograft", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 28, pp.707~713 (2020)
- Hsu WH, "Effect of high body mass index on knee muscle strength and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 19, pp.363~ (2018)
- Crawford SN, "Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Arthroscopy, 29, pp.1566~1571 (2013)