본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

現代日本語におけるヤリモライの構造 -「ト/カラ格」を受益者とする場合 -

A Study on the Sentence Structure of Yarimorai in Modern Japanese

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

There are two types of the sentence structure of Yarimorai in modern Japanese: (1) the beneficiary is in the core structure (2) the beneficiary is not in the core structure. The former type includes four types of Yarimorai : ⓐ the direct object of Yarimorai ⓑ the indirect object of Yarimorai ⓒ the possessor of direct object of Yarimorai ⓓ the possessor of indirection object of Yarimorai. Every Yarimorai verb can be applicable to the above type, but the following kiyoutai is used in daily expressions.  1)「…お父さんが四谷と和解してくれれば、いちばんいいんですが <お父さんが四谷と和解してくれる>(冬の旅)  2)下女の袈裟治は塵払を取り出して、背中に附いた雪を払ってくれる。 <袈裟治は(自分から)雪を払ってくれる>(破戒) The above sentence structures have not been studied. Therefore, the verbs which need these sentence structures are examined, and the positions of the sentence structure of Yarimorai are also investigated. The conclusion is as follows: The basic usage of Yarimorai belongs to the four types in case the beneficiary is in the core structure. The structure in which the to/kara case is the beneficiary, is also included in the indirect object of Yarimorai in that it requires the modifier which modifies the other to complete the categorical meaning of the kiyoutai verbs themselves. But with a formal point of view, it is not acceptable that the structure in which to/kara case is the beneficiary, is the same as the indirect object of Yarimorai because the structure requires either the to case or the kara case. And in case of the kara case, most of torihazusino musubituki, hanasiaiteno musubituki, and detokorono musubituki has the same meaning unless there is a strict semantic distinction, because the structure of the possessor of direct object of Yarimorai (no case) and reciprocal relationship between the kara case and the no case exist in the sentence. With the above reasons, I suggest that the structure of darekaga dareka (beneficiary)to/kara (nanikawo) ∼siteyaru/kureru be called another structural type.

Abstract

There are two types of the sentence structure of Yarimorai in modern Japanese: (1) the beneficiary is in the core structure (2) the beneficiary is not in the core structure. The former type includes four types of Yarimorai : ⓐ the direct object of Yarimorai ⓑ the indirect object of Yarimorai ⓒ the possessor of direct object of Yarimorai ⓓ the possessor of indirection object of Yarimorai. Every Yarimorai verb can be applicable to the above type, but the following kiyoutai is used in daily expressions.  1)「…お父さんが四谷と和解してくれれば、いちばんいいんですが <お父さんが四谷と和解してくれる>(冬の旅)  2)下女の袈裟治は塵払を取り出して、背中に附いた雪を払ってくれる。 <袈裟治は(自分から)雪を払ってくれる>(破戒) The above sentence structures have not been studied. Therefore, the verbs which need these sentence structures are examined, and the positions of the sentence structure of Yarimorai are also investigated. The conclusion is as follows: The basic usage of Yarimorai belongs to the four types in case the beneficiary is in the core structure. The structure in which the to/kara case is the beneficiary, is also included in the indirect object of Yarimorai in that it requires the modifier which modifies the other to complete the categorical meaning of the kiyoutai verbs themselves. But with a formal point of view, it is not acceptable that the structure in which to/kara case is the beneficiary, is the same as the indirect object of Yarimorai because the structure requires either the to case or the kara case. And in case of the kara case, most of torihazusino musubituki, hanasiaiteno musubituki, and detokorono musubituki has the same meaning unless there is a strict semantic distinction, because the structure of the possessor of direct object of Yarimorai (no case) and reciprocal relationship between the kara case and the no case exist in the sentence. With the above reasons, I suggest that the structure of darekaga dareka (beneficiary)to/kara (nanikawo) ∼siteyaru/kureru be called another structural type.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 言語學硏究會, "日本語文法․連語論(資料編)", pp.24~27 (1983), 麥書房
  2. 鈴木康之, "現代日本語の名詞的な連語の硏究", pp.169~ (1994), 日本語文法
  3. 黃 順花他, "やりもらい, 槪說․現代日本語文法", pp.61~65 (1989), 櫻楓社
  4. 黃 順花, "日本語の寄与態「してやる」「してくれる」に關する韓國語との對照硏究", 日語日文學硏究, 19 (1991), 韓國日語日文學會
  5. 黃 順花, "日本語のシテヤル、シテクレル", 國文學 解釋と鑑賞, 61(7), pp.86~87 (1996), 至文堂
  6. 黃 順花他, "文法記述で意味をどう扱うのか", 國文學 解釋と鑑賞, 63(7), pp.8~9 (1998), 至文堂
  7. 黃 順花, "寄与態における動詞の意味․用法", 人文論叢, 12, pp.433~438 (1999), 慶南大學校 人文科學硏究
  8. 黃 順花, "寄与態における受益者のあらわれ方", 國文學 解釋と鑑賞, 66(7), pp.153~156 (2001), 至文堂
  9. 黃 順花, "寄与態の構造的なタイプ", 日語日文學硏究, 40, pp.1~16 (2002), 韓國日語日文學會
  10. 黃 順花, "寄与態の文の構造に関する研究", 日本文化研究, 6, pp.372~379 (2002), 韓国日本学協会
  11. 黃 順花, "寄与態構造における日韓対照研究", 日本文化研究, 7 (2003), 東アジア日本学会
  12. 黃 順花, "現代日本語のヤリモライとその教育について", 国文学 解釈と鑑賞, 68(7), pp.99~102 (2003), 至文堂
  13. 黃 順花, "寄与態の文の構造-受益者が内部構造に存在しない場合", 日本文化研究, 10, pp.327~329 (2004), 東アジア日本学会
  14. 黃 順花, "寄与態構造における相互的関係 - 直接対象の持ち主と相手対象を話題に", 日本語文学, 24, pp.190~194 (2005), 韓国日本語文学会
  15. 黃 順花, "寄与態の副次的な用法", 日語日文学研究, 25, pp.131~138 (2005), 大韓日語日文学会
  16. 黃 順花, "寄与態の文の構造における日韓対照研究", 国文学解釈と鑑賞, 70(7) (2005), 至文堂

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (36건)