Concurrent Validation of T-REX Accelerometer
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To examine the concurrent validity of the T-REX accelerometer assessing physical activity against indirect calorimetry (oxygen uptake) and two different accelerometers (Actical and ActiGraph). Methods: Fifty healthy volunteers (25 men, age 23.5 ± 1.7 years; 25 women, age 22.4 ± 2.0 years) participated in tests using treadmill protocol. They walked or ran on a treadmill at four different speeds (4, 6, 8, and 10 km․h⁻¹ for men and 4, 6, 7.5, and 9 km․h⁻¹ for women) for 5 min at each speed. During the test, the T-REX (Taewoong Medical Co., Ltd., Korea) was attached at five locations on the body (ankle, arm, chest, waist, and wrist), the Actical was attached at two locations (waist and chest), and the ActiGraph was worn at the waist. Oxygen uptake (VO₂) was measured using a portable device during exercise, and metabolic equivalents (METs) were calculated. The validity of the T-REX was assessed using Pearson correlations and Bland–Altman plots. Results: There were strong associations between T-REX and VO₂ in men (r = 0.92–0.95) and women (r = 0.83–0.91) on the treadmill test (p<0.001). Associations between the T-REX and two different accelerometers (Actical and ActiGraph) were also strong (r = 0.89–0.98). Similar associations were also observed between VO₂ and Actical (r = 0.87–0.95) and between VO₂ and ActiGraph (r = 0.85–0.87). In the Bland–Altman plots, there were no statistical differences between VO₂ and five T-REX sensor locations in both men and women (all p>0.05). Conclusion: The T-REX has a high concurrent validity with VO₂ in assessing energy expenditure in men and women. This device might be an alternative to conventional accelerometers.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the concurrent validity of the T-REX accelerometer assessing physical activity against indirect calorimetry (oxygen uptake) and two different accelerometers (Actical and ActiGraph). Methods: Fifty healthy volunteers (25 men, age 23.5 ± 1.7 years; 25 women, age 22.4 ± 2.0 years) participated in tests using treadmill protocol. They walked or ran on a treadmill at four different speeds (4, 6, 8, and 10 km․h⁻¹ for men and 4, 6, 7.5, and 9 km․h⁻¹ for women) for 5 min at each speed. During the test, the T-REX (Taewoong Medical Co., Ltd., Korea) was attached at five locations on the body (ankle, arm, chest, waist, and wrist), the Actical was attached at two locations (waist and chest), and the ActiGraph was worn at the waist. Oxygen uptake (VO₂) was measured using a portable device during exercise, and metabolic equivalents (METs) were calculated. The validity of the T-REX was assessed using Pearson correlations and Bland–Altman plots. Results: There were strong associations between T-REX and VO₂ in men (r = 0.92–0.95) and women (r = 0.83–0.91) on the treadmill test (p<0.001). Associations between the T-REX and two different accelerometers (Actical and ActiGraph) were also strong (r = 0.89–0.98). Similar associations were also observed between VO₂ and Actical (r = 0.87–0.95) and between VO₂ and ActiGraph (r = 0.85–0.87). In the Bland–Altman plots, there were no statistical differences between VO₂ and five T-REX sensor locations in both men and women (all p>0.05). Conclusion: The T-REX has a high concurrent validity with VO₂ in assessing energy expenditure in men and women. This device might be an alternative to conventional accelerometers.
참고문헌 (33)
- Atallah, L, "Energy expenditure prediction using a miniaturized ear-worn sensor", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 43(7), pp.1369~1377 (2011)
- Atienza, A. A, "Self-reported and objectively measuredactivity relatedto biomarkers using NHANES", MedSci Sports Exerc, 43(5), pp.815~821 (2011)
- Bassett, D. R., Jr, "Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity", Res Q Exerc Sport, 71(2 Suppl), pp.S30~S36 (2000)
- Berendsen, B. A, "Which activity monitor to use? Validity, reproducibilityanduserfriendliness of three activity monitors", BMC Public Health, 14, pp.749~ (2014)
- Bouten, C. V, "Effects of placement and orientationof body-fixed accelerometers on the assessment ofenergyexpenditure during walking", Med Biol EngComput, 35(1), pp.50~56 (1997)
- Brown, D. K, "The validityof the ActiPed for physical activity monitoring", IntJ SportsMed, 34(5), pp.431~437 (2013)
- Crouter, S. E, "A new 2-regression model for the Actical accelerometer", Br J Sports Med, 42(3), pp.217~224 (2008)
- Daniels, J, "Running economy of elite male and elite female runners", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 24(4), pp.483~489 (1992)
- Ellis, K, "A random forest classifierfor the prediction of energy expenditure and typeof physicalactivity from wrist and hip accelerometers", Physiol Meas, 35(11), pp.2191~2203 (2014)
- Esliger, D. W, "Validationof the GENEA Accelerometer", Med Sci SportsExerc, 43(6), pp.1085~1093 (2011)
- Eston, R. G, "Validity of heart rate, pedometry, and accelerometryfor predicting the energy cost of children'sactivities", JAppl Physiol(1985), 84(1), pp.362~371 (1998)
- Freedson, P. S, "Evaluation of artificialneural network algorithms for predicting METs andactivity typefrom accelerometer data : validation onan independent sample", J Appl Physiol(1985), 111(6), pp.1804~1812 (2011)
- Hagenbuchner, M, "Prediction of activitytype in preschool children using machine learningtechniques", J Sci Med Sport, 18(4), pp.426~431 (2015)
- Hall, C, "Energy expenditure of walking andrunning : comparison with prediction equations", MedSci SportsExerc, 36(12), pp.2128~2134 (2004)
- Hall, K. S, "METs and accelerometryof walking in older adults : standard versus measuredenergycost", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 45(3), pp.574~582 (2013)
- Hanggi, J. M, "Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph inchildren and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph", J Sci Med Sport, 16(1), pp.40~44 (2013)
- Hasson, R. E, "Validity of theOmron HJ-112 pedometer during treadmill walking", Med SciSports Exerc, 41(4), pp.805~809 (2009)
- Hekler, E. B, "Validation of Physical Activity Trackingvia AndroidSmartphones Compared to ActiGraphAccelerometer : Laboratory-Based and Free-LivingValidation Studies", JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 3(2), pp.e36~ (2015)
- Johnson, M, "Validity ofthe Actical activity monitor for assessing steps andenergyexpenditure during walking", J Sports Sci, 33(8), pp.769~776 (2015)
- Lyden, K, "A comprehensive evaluationof commonly used accelerometer energy expenditureandMET prediction equations", Eur J Appl Physiol, 111(2), pp.187~201 (2011)
- Mannini, A, "Accelerometry-based Recognition of the PlacementSites of a Wearable Sensor", Pervasive Mob Comput, 21, pp.62~74 (2015)
- Pavey, T. G, "The validity of the GENEActivwrist-worn accelerometer for measuring adultsedentary time infree living", J Sci Med Sport, 19(5), pp.395~399 (2016)
- Saibene, F, "Biomechanical andphysiological aspects of legged locomotion in humans", Eur J Appl Physiol, 88(4-5), pp.297~316 (2003)
- Schall, M. C., Jr, "Evaluation of four sensor locations for physicalactivity assessment", Appl Ergon, 53, pp.103~109 (2016)
- Sieverdes, J. C, "Reliabilityand validity of the Mywellness Key physical activitymonitor", Clin Epidemiol, 5, pp.13~20 (2013)
- Staudenmayer, J, "An artificial neural network toestimate physical activity energy expenditure andidentify physical activity type from an accelerometer", J Appl Physiol, 107(4), pp.1300~1307 (2009)
- Stone, M. R, "Relationships between accelerometer-assessed physicalactivity and health in children : impact of theactivityintensity classification method", J Sports SciMed, 8(1), pp.136~143 (2009)
- Swartz, A. M, "Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometersat hip and wrist sites", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 32(9Suppl), pp.S450~S456 (2000)
- Tully, M. A, "The validation of Fibit Zip physical activitymonitor as a measure of free-living physicalactivity", BMCResNotes, 7, pp.952~ (2014)
- Van Domelen, D. R, "Is there a sex difference inaccelerometer countsduring walking in olderadults?", J Phys Act Health, 11(3), pp.626~637 (2014)
- Welch, W. A, "Cross-validation of waist-worn GENEAaccelerometer cut-points", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 46(9), pp.1825~1830 (2014)
- Westerterp, K. R, "Assessment of physicalactivity : a critical appraisal", Eur J Appl Physiol, 105(6), pp.823~828 (2009)
- Zhu, W, "Invariance of wearinglocation of Omron-BI pedometers : a validationstudy", J Phys Act Health, 7(6), pp.706~717 (2010)