Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire for breast cancer survivors in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) developed in Korea for breast cancer survivors. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Ninety-nine breast cancer survivors who completed an FFQ twice and three 3-day dietary records (DRs) between 2016–2017 were included. Energy and 14 nutrient intakes were calculated from FFQs and DRs. To determine the validity of the FFQ, energy-adjusted de-attenuated Pearson correlations between two FFQ assessments and the average of the three 3-day DRs were calculated, and to determine reproducibility, energy-adjusted Pearson correlations and degrees of agreement were calculated between the first and second FFQ assessments. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients of validity ranged from 0.29 (protein) to 0.47 (fat) (median value = 0.36) for the FFQ assessment and from 0.20 (riboflavin) to 0.53 (calcium) (median value = 0.37) for the second. Correlation coefficients of reproducibility ranged from 0.22 (sodium) to 0.62 (carbohydrate) (median value = 0.36). Regarding FFQ reproducibilities, percentage classifications of exact agreements for energy-adjusted nutrients ranged from 27.3% (sodium) and 45.5% (fat). A median 76.8% of participants were classified into the same or adjacent quartiles, while a median of 5.6% of participants were classified in extreme quartiles. Bland–Atman plots for the majority of data points of three macronutrients, calcium and vitamins A and C fell within limits of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that the newly developed FFQ for Korean breast cancer survivors has acceptable validity and reproducibility as compared with three 3-day DRs collected over a one-year period.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) developed in Korea for breast cancer survivors. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Ninety-nine breast cancer survivors who completed an FFQ twice and three 3-day dietary records (DRs) between 2016–2017 were included. Energy and 14 nutrient intakes were calculated from FFQs and DRs. To determine the validity of the FFQ, energy-adjusted de-attenuated Pearson correlations between two FFQ assessments and the average of the three 3-day DRs were calculated, and to determine reproducibility, energy-adjusted Pearson correlations and degrees of agreement were calculated between the first and second FFQ assessments. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients of validity ranged from 0.29 (protein) to 0.47 (fat) (median value = 0.36) for the FFQ assessment and from 0.20 (riboflavin) to 0.53 (calcium) (median value = 0.37) for the second. Correlation coefficients of reproducibility ranged from 0.22 (sodium) to 0.62 (carbohydrate) (median value = 0.36). Regarding FFQ reproducibilities, percentage classifications of exact agreements for energy-adjusted nutrients ranged from 27.3% (sodium) and 45.5% (fat). A median 76.8% of participants were classified into the same or adjacent quartiles, while a median of 5.6% of participants were classified in extreme quartiles. Bland–Atman plots for the majority of data points of three macronutrients, calcium and vitamins A and C fell within limits of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that the newly developed FFQ for Korean breast cancer survivors has acceptable validity and reproducibility as compared with three 3-day DRs collected over a one-year period.
참고문헌 (32)
- Bray F, "Global cancer statistics 2018 : GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries", CA Cancer J Clin, 68, pp.394~424 (2018)
- 정규원, "Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2015", Cancer Research and Treatment, 50(2), pp.303~316 (2018), 대한암학회
- "Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Cancer: a Global Perspective - The Third Expert Report" (2018)[URL]
- Michels KB, "Diet and breast cancer : a review of the prospective observational studies", Cancer, 109(Suppl), pp.2712~2749 (2007)
- Rossi RE, "The role of dietary factors in prevention and progression of breast cancer", Anticancer Res, 34, pp.6861~6875 (2014)
- Rock CL, "Nutrition and survival after the diagnosis of breast cancer : a review of the evidence", J Clin Oncol, 20, pp.3302~3316 (2002)
- Miller AB, "Role of nutrition in the etiology of breast cancer", Cancer, 39(Suppl), pp.2704~2708 (1977)
- Graham S, "Diet in the epidemiology of postmenopausal breast cancer in the New York State Cohort", Am J Epidemiol, 136, pp.1327~1337 (1992)
- Subar AF, "Improving food frequency questionnaires : a qualitative approach using cognitive interviewing", J Am Diet Assoc, 95, pp.781~788 (1995)
- Willett W, "Nutritional Epidemiology", pp.70~95 (2013), Oxford University Press
- Shin WK, "Development of a FFQ for breast cancer survivors in Korea", Br J Nutr, 116, pp.1~6 (2016)
- The Korean Nutrition Society, "CAN-Pro 4.0 (Computer Aided Nutritional analysis program)", The Korean Nutrition Society, ~ (2011)
- "Food Composition Database" (2020)[URL]
- "Korean Food Composition Table" (2020)[URL]
- Willett W, "Nutritional Epidemiology", pp.260~286 (2013), Oxford University Press
- Willett W, "Nutritional Epidemiology", pp.287~304 (2013), Oxford University Press
- Shu XO, "Validity and reproducibility of the food frequency questionnaire used in the Shanghai Women’s Health Study", Eur J Clin Nutr, 58, pp.17~23 (2004)
- Ahn Y, "Validation and reproducibility of food frequency questionnaire for Korean genome epidemiologic study", Eur J Clin Nutr, 61, pp.1435~1441 (2007)
- Bland JM, "Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement", Lancet, 1, pp.307~310 (1986)
- Willett WC, "Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire", Am J Epidemiol, 122, pp.51~65 (1985)
- Amanatidis S, "Comparison of two frequency questionnaires for quantifying fruit and vegetable intake", Public Health Nutr, 4, pp.233~239 (2001)
- 나윤주, "Development and validation of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess nutritional status in Korean adults", Nutrition Research and Practice, 6(5), pp.444~450 (2012), 한국영양학회[DOI]
- Park MK, "Validity and reliability of a dishbased, semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for Korean diet and cancer research", Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, pp.545~552 (2012)
- Kim DW, "Reproducibility and validity of an FFQ developed for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(KNHANES)", Public Health Nutr, 18, pp.1369~1377 (2015)
- 김소혜, "한국인을 위한 반정량 식품섭취빈도 조사지의 개발 및 타당도 연구", Journal of Nutrition and Health, 51(1), pp.103~119 (2018), 한국영양학회[DOI]
- Cade J, "Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires-a review", Public Health Nutr, 5, pp.567~587 (2002)
- Cade JE, "Food-frequency questionnaires : a review of their design, validation and utilisation", Nutr Res Rev, 17, pp.5~22 (2004)
- Voss S, "Is macronutrient composition of dietary intake data affected by underreporting? Results from the EPIC-Potsdam Study. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition", Eur J Clin Nutr, 52, pp.119~126 (1998)
- Nagel G, "Long-term reproducibility of a food-frequency questionnaire and dietary changes in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition(EPIC)-Heidelberg cohort", Br J Nutr, 98, pp.194~200 (2007)
- Kristal AR, "Associations of race", ethnicity, education, and dietary intervention with the validity and reliability of a food frequency questionnaire : the Women’s Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations, 1997, pp.146, 856~869
- Beaton GH, "Approaches to analysis of dietary data : relationship between planned analyses and choice of methodology", Am J Clin Nutr, 59(Suppl), pp.253S~261S (1994)
- Freedman LS, "Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies", J Natl Cancer Inst, 103, pp.1086~1092 (2011)