본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Detailed Clinical Models: Representing Knowledge, Data and Semantics in Healthcare Information Technology

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: This paper will present an overview of the developmental effort in harmonizing clinical knowledge modeling using the Detailed Clinical Models (DCMs), and will explain how it can contribute to the preservation of Electronic Health Records (EHR) data. Methods: Clinical knowledge modeling is vital for the management and preservation of EHR and data. Such modeling provides common data elements and terminology binding with the intention of capturing and managing clinical information over time and location independent from technology. Any EHR data exchange without an agreed clinical knowledge modeling will potentially result in loss of information. Results: Many attempts exist from the past to model clinical knowledge for the benefits of semantic interoperability using standardized data representation and common terminologies. The objective of each project is similar with respect to consistent representation of clinical data, using standardized terminologies, and an overall logical approach. However, the conceptual, logical, and the technical expressions are quite different in one clinical knowledge modeling approach versus another. There currently are synergies under the Clinical Information Modeling Initiative (CIMI) in order to create a harmonized reference model for clinical knowledge models. Conclusions: The goal for the CIMI is to create a reference model and formalisms based on for instance the DCM (ISO/TS 13972), among other work. A global repository of DCMs may potentially be established in the future.

Abstract

Objectives: This paper will present an overview of the developmental effort in harmonizing clinical knowledge modeling using the Detailed Clinical Models (DCMs), and will explain how it can contribute to the preservation of Electronic Health Records (EHR) data. Methods: Clinical knowledge modeling is vital for the management and preservation of EHR and data. Such modeling provides common data elements and terminology binding with the intention of capturing and managing clinical information over time and location independent from technology. Any EHR data exchange without an agreed clinical knowledge modeling will potentially result in loss of information. Results: Many attempts exist from the past to model clinical knowledge for the benefits of semantic interoperability using standardized data representation and common terminologies. The objective of each project is similar with respect to consistent representation of clinical data, using standardized terminologies, and an overall logical approach. However, the conceptual, logical, and the technical expressions are quite different in one clinical knowledge modeling approach versus another. There currently are synergies under the Clinical Information Modeling Initiative (CIMI) in order to create a harmonized reference model for clinical knowledge models. Conclusions: The goal for the CIMI is to create a reference model and formalisms based on for instance the DCM (ISO/TS 13972), among other work. A global repository of DCMs may potentially be established in the future.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Huff SM, "Integrating detailed clinical models into application development tools", Stud Health Technol Inform, 107(Pt 2), pp.1058~1062 (2004)
  2. International Organization for Standardization, "Health informatics: detailed clinical models, characteristics and processes", International Organization for Standardization (ISO, 2014
  3. William Goossen, "Detailed Clinical Models: A Review", Healthcare Informatics Research, 16(4), pp.201~214 (2010), 대한의료정보학회
  4. Rector AL, "A framework for modeling the electronic medical record", Methods Inf Med, 32, pp.109~119 (1993)
  5. Goossen W, "Detailed clinical models: kennis en semantiek weergeven met UML en XML", Element, 17(1), pp.11~16 (2011)
  6. Beale T, "Archetypes and the EHR", Stud Health Technol Inform, 96, pp.238~244 (2003)
  7. van der Kooij J, "Evaluation of documents that integrate knowledge, terminology and information models", Stud Health Technol Inform, 122, pp.519~522 (2006)
  8. "Clinical Contents Manager" (2012)[URL]
  9. Goossen W, "Representing knowledge, data and concepts for EHRS using DCM", Stud Health Technol Inform, 169, pp.774~778 (2011)
  10. Blobel B, "Architectural approach to eHealth for enabling paradigm changes in health", Methods Inf Med, 49(2), pp.123~134 (2010)
  11. "Model Driven Architecture" (2014)[URL]
  12. Goossen W, "Clinical knowledge modeling using Detailed Clinical Models", Proceedings of the 23rd International CODATA Conference (2012)
  13. Goossen WT, "Bridging the HL7 template: 13606 archetype gap with detailed clinical models", Stud Health Technol Inform, 160(Pt 2), pp.932~936 (2010)
  14. Teasdale G, "Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale", Lancet, 2(7872), pp.81~84 (1974)
  15. "Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)" (2014)[URL]
  16. "SNOMED CT" (2014)[URL]
  17. "LOINC" (2014)[URL]
  18. Cuggia M, "Comparing the APGAR score representation in HL7 and OpenEHR formalisms", Stud Health Technol Inform, 150, pp.250~254 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)