Detailed Clinical Models: A Review
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Due to the increasing use of electronic patient records and other health care information technology, we see an increase in requests to utilize these data. A highly level of standardization is required during the gathering of these data in the clinical context in order to use it for analyses. Detailed Clinical Models (DCM) have been created toward this purpose and several initiatives have been implemented in various parts of the world to create standardized models. This paper presents a review of DCM. Methods: Two types of analyses are presented; one comparing DCM against health care information architectures and a second bottom up approach from concept analysis to representation. In addition core parts of the draft ISO standard 13972 on DCM are used such as clinician involvement, data element specification, modeling, meta information, and repository and governance. Results: Six initiatives were selected: Intermountain Healthcare, 13606/OpenEHR Archetypes,Clinical Templates, Clinical Contents Models, Health Level 7 templates, and Dutch Detailed Clinical Models. Each model selected was reviewed for their overall development, involvement of clinicians, use of data types, code bindings, expressing semantics, modeling, meta information, use of repository and governance. Conclusions: Using both a top down and bottom up approach to comparison reveals many commonalties and differences between initiatives. Important differences include the use of or lack of a reference model and expressiveness of models. Applying clinical data element standards facilitates the use of conceptual DCM models in different technical representations.
Abstract
Objectives: Due to the increasing use of electronic patient records and other health care information technology, we see an increase in requests to utilize these data. A highly level of standardization is required during the gathering of these data in the clinical context in order to use it for analyses. Detailed Clinical Models (DCM) have been created toward this purpose and several initiatives have been implemented in various parts of the world to create standardized models. This paper presents a review of DCM. Methods: Two types of analyses are presented; one comparing DCM against health care information architectures and a second bottom up approach from concept analysis to representation. In addition core parts of the draft ISO standard 13972 on DCM are used such as clinician involvement, data element specification, modeling, meta information, and repository and governance. Results: Six initiatives were selected: Intermountain Healthcare, 13606/OpenEHR Archetypes,Clinical Templates, Clinical Contents Models, Health Level 7 templates, and Dutch Detailed Clinical Models. Each model selected was reviewed for their overall development, involvement of clinicians, use of data types, code bindings, expressing semantics, modeling, meta information, use of repository and governance. Conclusions: Using both a top down and bottom up approach to comparison reveals many commonalties and differences between initiatives. Important differences include the use of or lack of a reference model and expressiveness of models. Applying clinical data element standards facilitates the use of conceptual DCM models in different technical representations.
참고문헌 (27)
- Huff SM, "Integrating detailed clinical models into application development tools", Stud Health Technol Inform, 107, pp.1058~1062 (2004)
- Parker CG, "Detailed clinical models for sharable, executable guidelines", Stud Health Technol Inform, 107, pp.145~148 (2004)
- Goossen W, "Model once, use multiple times: reusing HL7 domain models from one domain to the other", Stud Health Technol Inform, 107, pp.366~370 (2004)
- Goossen WT, "Using detailed clinical models to bridge the gap between clinicians and HIT. In Collaborative patient centred ehealth", pp.3~10 (2008), IOS Press
- "Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium"[URL]
- "SNOMED CT"[URL]
- European Committee for Standardization (CEN), "ISO", CEN 13972 Health Informatics: quality criteria and methodology for detailed clinical models draft materials, 2010
- "Open source healthcare solutions that facilitate collaboration"[URL]
- Hoy D, "A feasibility study on clinical templates for the National Health Service in Scotland", Stud Health Technol Inform, 129, pp.770~774 (2007)
- "Normative Edition of the HL7 Standards 2010"[URL]
- van der Kooij J, "Evaluation of documents that integrate knowledge, terminology and information models", Stud Health Technol Inform, 122, pp.519~522 (2006)
- "Clinical Contents Model"[URL]
- European Committee for Standardization (CEN), "ISO", CEN 13606: health Informatics–-electronic health record communication, 2010
- Rector AL, "A framework for modelling the electronic medical record", Methods Inf Med, 32, pp.109~119 (1993)
- Johnson SB, "Generic data modeling for clinical repositories", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 3, pp.328~339 (1996)
- "Archetypes constraint-based domain models for future-proof information systems"[URL]
- Beale T, "Archetypes and the EHR", Stud Health Technol Inform, 96, pp.238~244 (2003)
- "OpenEHR: clinical knowledge manger"[URL]
- White TM, "Extending the LOINC conceptual schema to support standardized assessment instruments", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 9, pp.586~599 (2002)
- Blobel B, "Architectural approach to eHealth for enabling paradigm changes in health", Methods Inf Med, 49, pp.123~134 (2010)
- "CDE browser. Bethesda (MD):National Cancer Institute"[URL]
- Huff SM, "Presentation on detailed clinical models", HL7 Netherlands, ~ (2010)
- "Development of evaluation metrics for DCM"[URL]
- de Bel E, "Ontwikkeling van een elektronisch patientendossier op basis van HL7", HL7 Mag, 25, pp.6~8 (2005)
- Goossen WT, "Goossen-Baremans A. Bridging the HL7 template: 13606 archetype gap with detailed clinical models", Stud Health Technol Inform, 160, pp.932~936 (2010)
- Dutch Mirror Group on Information Models & Messages, "Insight into the choices to be made in standards for the electronic exchange of health record information", Netherlands Normalization institute (NEN), ~ (2008)
- Blobel B, "Advanced and secure architectural EHR approaches", Int J Med Inform, 75, pp.185~190 (2006)