본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Public Acceptance of a Health Information Exchange in Korea

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: We assessed the public acceptance of a health information exchange (HIE) and examined factors that influenced the acceptance and associations among constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Methods: We collected data from a survey of 1,000 individuals in Korea, which was administered through a structured questionnaire. We assessed the validity and reliability of the survey instrument with exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. We computed descriptive statistics to assess the acceptance and performed regression analyses with a structural equation model to estimate the magnitude and significance of influences among constructs of TAM. Results: Eighty-seven percent of the respondents were willing to use the technology, and the average level of agreement with the need for the technology was 4.16 on a 5-point Likert scale. The perception of ease of use of the technology significantly influenced perceptions of usefulness and attitudes about the need for HIE. Perceptions of usefulness influenced attitude and behavioral intention to use HIE, and attitude influenced intention. Age showed a wide range of influences throughout the model, and experience with offline-based information exchange and health status also showed noteworthy influences. Conclusions: The public acceptance of HIE was high, and influences posited by TAM were mostly confirmed by the study results. The study findings indicated a need for an education and communication strategy tailored by population age, health status, and prior experience with offline-based exchange to gain public buy-in for a successful introduction of the technology.

Abstract

Objectives: We assessed the public acceptance of a health information exchange (HIE) and examined factors that influenced the acceptance and associations among constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Methods: We collected data from a survey of 1,000 individuals in Korea, which was administered through a structured questionnaire. We assessed the validity and reliability of the survey instrument with exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. We computed descriptive statistics to assess the acceptance and performed regression analyses with a structural equation model to estimate the magnitude and significance of influences among constructs of TAM. Results: Eighty-seven percent of the respondents were willing to use the technology, and the average level of agreement with the need for the technology was 4.16 on a 5-point Likert scale. The perception of ease of use of the technology significantly influenced perceptions of usefulness and attitudes about the need for HIE. Perceptions of usefulness influenced attitude and behavioral intention to use HIE, and attitude influenced intention. Age showed a wide range of influences throughout the model, and experience with offline-based information exchange and health status also showed noteworthy influences. Conclusions: The public acceptance of HIE was high, and influences posited by TAM were mostly confirmed by the study results. The study findings indicated a need for an education and communication strategy tailored by population age, health status, and prior experience with offline-based exchange to gain public buy-in for a successful introduction of the technology.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Report to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on Defining key health information technology terms, "The National Alliance for Health Information Technology", Department of Health and Human Services, ~ (2008)
  2. Kaelber DC, "Health information exchange and patient safety", J Biomed Inform, 40(6Suppl), pp.S40~S45 (2007)
  3. Improving health sector efficiency: the role of information and communication technologies, "Organisation of Economic Co-operation", Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development, ~ (2010)
  4. Walker J, "The value of health care information exchange and interoperability", Health Aff (Millwood), pp.W5-10~W5-18 (2005)
  5. "Promoting Interoperability (PI) programs" (2018)[URL]
  6. "Summary Care Records (SCR)" (2016)[URL]
  7. "A conversation about digital health: annual report 2015-2016" (2016)[URL]
  8. "What is my health record?" (2018)[URL]
  9. Center for Interoperable EHR, "EHR system functionality and health information exchange" (2010), Elsevier Korea
  10. Park H, "Can a health information exchange save healthcare costs? Evidence from a pilot program in South Korea", Int J Med Inform, 84(9), pp.658~666 (2015)
  11. Establishing and activating the infrastructure of medical information exchange based on health-care information ecosystem, "Korea Health Industry Development Institute", Jeonwooyongsachon, ~ (2016)
  12. Hersh W, "Health information exchange" (2015), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  13. 박하영, "진료정보교류 인센티브사업에 대한 이해관계자 조사연구", 한국IT서비스학회지, 16(3), pp.17~45 (2017), 한국IT서비스학회[DOI]
  14. 지혜림, "Technology and Policy Challenges in the Adoption and Operation of Health Information Exchange Systems", Healthcare Informatics Research, 23(4), pp.314~321 (2017), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
  15. Ancker JS, "Consumer perceptions of electronic health information exchange", Am J Prev Med, 43(1), pp.76~80 (2012)
  16. Ancker JS, "Consumer experience with and attitudes toward health information technology : a nationwide survey", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 20(1), pp.152~156 (2013)
  17. O'Donnell HC, "Healthcare consumers' attitudes towards physician and personal use of health information exchange", J Gen Intern Med, 26(9), pp.1019~1026 (2011)
  18. Park H, "Patients' perceptions of a health information exchange : a pilot program in South Korea", Int J Med Inform, 82(2), pp.98~107 (2013)
  19. Agaku IT, "Concern about security and privacy, and perceived control over collection and use of health information are related to withholding of health information from healthcare providers", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 21(2), pp.374~378 (2014)
  20. Dimitropoulos L, "Public attitudes toward health information exchange:perceived benefits and concerns", Am J Manag Care, 17(12 Spec), pp.SP111~SP116 (2011)
  21. Grande D, "Public preferences about secondary uses of electronic health information", JAMA Intern Med, 173(19), pp.1798~1806 (2013)
  22. Whiddett R, "Patients'attitudes towards sharing their health information", Int J Med Inform, 75(7), pp.530~541 (2006)
  23. Davis FD, "User acceptance of computer technology : a comparison of two theoretical models", Manag Sci, 35(8), pp.982~1003 (1989)
  24. "The Korea national health and examination survey contents" (2016)[URL]
  25. "2016 Administrative district population by age and sex" (2016)[URL]
  26. Patel VN, "Consumer support for health information exchange and personal health records : a regional health information organization survey", J Med Syst, 36(3), pp.1043~1052 (2012)
  27. Esmaeilzadeh P, "Patients' support for health information exchange : a literature review and classification of key factors", BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 17(1), pp.33~ (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)