본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Zhu Xi’s Theory of Heterodoxy and King Sejong’s Thinking of Zhongyong: Focusing on the Arguments over the Sarigak at Heungcheonsa Temple

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

King Sejong practiced faithfully the Confucian policies that had been established with the foundation of the new Joseon dynasty. He was a typical Confucian king who repressed Buddhism, which had been the state religion in the preceding Goryeo dynasty. When he expressed support for a Buddhist event of repairing the sarigak at Heungcheonsa temple in the capital in the 17th year of his reign (1435), however, King Sejong came into conflict with his Confucian subjects. The opposition assumed various aspects in the process until the conflict came to an end, and the will of King Sejong was accomplished in the 24th year of his reign (1442). Previous studies have interpreted the Buddhismfriendly events of the Confucian King Sejong from the viewpoints of social, national, and religious necessity as well as of functionalism, usefulness, and practicability. This paper, however, pays attention to the reasoning structure of King Sejong. It aims to show that while Confucian subjects argued on the basis of Zhu Xi’s theory of heterodoxy, King Sejong employed zhongyong (doctrine of the mean) in the conflicts with his subjects on Buddhist events. In addition, this paper examines the relationship between Zhu Xi’s theory of heterodoxy and the theory of zhongyong, and gives ideological meaning to the arguments between King Sejong and his subjects.

Abstract

King Sejong practiced faithfully the Confucian policies that had been established with the foundation of the new Joseon dynasty. He was a typical Confucian king who repressed Buddhism, which had been the state religion in the preceding Goryeo dynasty. When he expressed support for a Buddhist event of repairing the sarigak at Heungcheonsa temple in the capital in the 17th year of his reign (1435), however, King Sejong came into conflict with his Confucian subjects. The opposition assumed various aspects in the process until the conflict came to an end, and the will of King Sejong was accomplished in the 24th year of his reign (1442). Previous studies have interpreted the Buddhismfriendly events of the Confucian King Sejong from the viewpoints of social, national, and religious necessity as well as of functionalism, usefulness, and practicability. This paper, however, pays attention to the reasoning structure of King Sejong. It aims to show that while Confucian subjects argued on the basis of Zhu Xi’s theory of heterodoxy, King Sejong employed zhongyong (doctrine of the mean) in the conflicts with his subjects on Buddhist events. In addition, this paper examines the relationship between Zhu Xi’s theory of heterodoxy and the theory of zhongyong, and gives ideological meaning to the arguments between King Sejong and his subjects.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. "Jachi tonggam hunui 自治通鑑訓義(Explanations on the Comprehensive Mirror for Aid in Government)", ~
  2. "Jinsilu 近思錄 (Reflections on Things at Hand)", ~
  3. "Sejong sillok 世宗實錄 (Annals of King Sejong)", ~
  4. "Sishu daquan 四書大全(Great Collection of the Four Books)", ~
  5. "Zhongyong 中庸(Doctrine of the Mean)", ~
  6. "Zhongyong huowen 中庸或問(Questions and Answers on the Doctrine of the Mean)", ~
  7. "Zhongyong zhangju 中庸章句(Commentaries on the Doctrine of the Mean)", ~
  8. "Zhongyong zhangju daquan 中庸章句大全(Collection of Commentaries on the Doctrine of the Mean)", ~
  9. "Zhongyong zhangju xu 中庸章句序(Preface to Commentaries on the Doctrine of the Mean)", ~
  10. Choi, Sang-yong, "Statesman Jeong Do-jeon" (2007), Kkachi
  11. Han, Woo-Keun, "A Study on the History of Thought during the Joseon Dynasty Era" (1996), : Ilchokak
  12. Keum, Jang-tae, "The Religious Culture during Sejong’s Period and Sejong’s ReligiousConsciousness" (2001), Korean Studies Information Service System
  13. Kim, Young-Ju, "A Study on the Formation of Public Opinion in the Early Joseon Dynasty", Journal of Communication Science, 2(3) (2002)
  14. Kim, Yong-Jick, "Korean Politics and Publicity", Korean Journal of International Relations, 38(3) (1998)
  15. Lee, Han-wu, "Sejong, He is Joseon" (2003), Dongbang Media
  16. 이현출, "사림정치기의 공론정치 전통과 현대적 함의", 한국정치학회보, 36(3), pp.115~134 (2002), 한국정치학회
  17. 이승환, "동양에서 ‘공적 합리성’의 특성과 근대적 변용: 성리학적 公論觀을 통해 본 '진리의 정치'와 '관용의 정치'", 철학연구, 29(29), pp.3~46 (2005), 철학연구소
  18. Park, Hong-kyu, "Sejong’s Political Tactics and Escape from Taejong: The Change in the 9th Year of Sejong’s Reign", Paper presented at the 1st Korean Leadership Conference (2008)
  19. 박현모, "‘성주(聖主)’와 ‘독부(獨夫)’ 사이: 척불(斥佛)논쟁과 정치가 세종의 고뇌", 정치사상연구, 11(2), pp.39~61 (2005), 한국정치사상학회
  20. Park, Hyun Mo, "The Departure of Confucian Gongnon Politics, In History of Korean Political Thought", pp.239~259 (2005), Baeksan Publishing
  21. Pu, Nam Chul, "Buddhist Faith and Confucian Politics of Sejong, In The Statecraft of Sejong", pp.53~78 (2006), Jisik Sanupsa
  22. 엄훈, "조선시대 공론 영역 논변에 대한 장르론적 접근", 국어교육학연구, 14(14) (2002), 국어교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)