본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Modified Mixture of Experts for the Diagnosis of Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures in Locally Rectal Cancer Patients

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a modified mixture of experts (ME) model with repeated measured tumoural Ktrans value to perform an automatic diagnosis of responder based on perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of rectal cancer. Methods: The data used in this study was obtained from 39 patients with primary rectal carcinoma who were scheduled for preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The modified ME model is a joint modeling of the ME model via the linear mixed effect model. First, we considered two local experts and a gating network, and the modified expert network as a liner mixed effect model. Afterward, the finding estimates were obtained via the expectation-maximization algorithm. All computation was performed by R-2.15.2. Results: We found that two experts have different patterns. The feature of expert 1 (n = 10) had a higher baseline value and a lower slope than expert 2 (n = 29). A comparison of the estimated experts and responder/non-responder groups according to T-downstaging criteria showed that expert 1 had a more effect treatment responder than expert 2. Conclusions: A novel feature of this study is that it is an extension of classical ME models in case of repeatedly measured data. The proposed model has the advantages of flexibility and adaptability for identifying distinct subgroups with various time patterns, and it can be applied to biomedical data which is measured repeatedly, such as time-course microarray data or cohort data. This method can assist physicians as important diagnostic decision making mechanism.

Abstract

Objectives: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a modified mixture of experts (ME) model with repeated measured tumoural Ktrans value to perform an automatic diagnosis of responder based on perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of rectal cancer. Methods: The data used in this study was obtained from 39 patients with primary rectal carcinoma who were scheduled for preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The modified ME model is a joint modeling of the ME model via the linear mixed effect model. First, we considered two local experts and a gating network, and the modified expert network as a liner mixed effect model. Afterward, the finding estimates were obtained via the expectation-maximization algorithm. All computation was performed by R-2.15.2. Results: We found that two experts have different patterns. The feature of expert 1 (n = 10) had a higher baseline value and a lower slope than expert 2 (n = 29). A comparison of the estimated experts and responder/non-responder groups according to T-downstaging criteria showed that expert 1 had a more effect treatment responder than expert 2. Conclusions: A novel feature of this study is that it is an extension of classical ME models in case of repeatedly measured data. The proposed model has the advantages of flexibility and adaptability for identifying distinct subgroups with various time patterns, and it can be applied to biomedical data which is measured repeatedly, such as time-course microarray data or cohort data. This method can assist physicians as important diagnostic decision making mechanism.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Corchado JM, "Model of experts for decision support in the diagnosis of leukemia patients", Artif Intell Med, 46(3), pp.179~200 (2009)
  2. Shortliffe EH, "Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine" (2006), Springer
  3. Spilker ME, "Mixture model approach to tumor classification based on pharmacokinetic measures of tumor permeability", J Magn Reson Imaging, 22(4), pp.549~558 (2005)
  4. Jacobs RA, "Adaptive mixtures of local experts", Neural Comput, 3(1), pp.79~87 (1991)
  5. Jordan MI, "Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the EM algorithm", Neural Comput, 6(2), pp.181~214 (1994)
  6. Chen K, "Improved learning algorithms for mixture of experts in multiclass classification", Neural Netw, 12(9), pp.1229~1252 (1999)
  7. Dempster AP, "Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm", J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol, 39(1), pp.1~38 (1977)
  8. Ubeyli ED, "A mixture of experts network structure for breast cancer diagnosis", J Med Syst, 29(5), pp.569~579 (2005)
  9. Subasi A, "EEG signal classification using wavelet feature extraction and a mixture of expert model", Expert Syst Appl, 32(4), pp.1084~1093 (2007)
  10. Raman S, "Infinite mixture-of-experts model for sparse survival regression with application to breast cancer", BMC Bioinformatics, 11(Suppl 8), pp.S8~ (2010)
  11. 명성민, "A Mixture of Experts Model for the Diagnosis of Liver Cirrhosis by Measuring the Liver Stiffness", Healthcare Informatics Research, 18(1), pp.29~34 (2012), 대한의료정보학회
  12. Shankaracharya A, "Computational intelligence-based diagnosis tool for the detection of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in India", Rev Diabet Stud, 9(1), pp.55~62 (2012)
  13. Lim JS, "Perfusion MRI for the prediction of treatment response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer", Eur Radiol, 22(8), pp.1693~1700 (2012)
  14. Padhani AR, "Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations", Neoplasia, 11(2), pp.102~125 (2009)
  15. McCullagh P, "Generalized linear models" (1983), Chapman and Hall
  16. Jordan MI, "Convergence results for the EM approach to mixture of experts architectures", Neural Netw, 8(9), pp.1409~1431 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)