본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

라디오믹스 기반 직장암 수술 위험도 예측을 위한 MRI 반자동 선택 바이오마커 검증 연구

A Study on MRI Semi-Automatically Selected Biomarkers for Predicting Risk of Rectal Cancer Surgery Based on Radiomics

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Currently, studies to predict the risk of rectal cancer surgery select MRI image slices based on the clinical experience of surgeons. The purpose of this study is to semi-automatically select and classify 2D MRI image slides to predict the risk of rectal cancer surgery using biomarkers. The data used were retrospectively collected MRI imag- ing data of 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer at Gachon University Gil Medical Center. Expert-selected MRI image slices and non-selected slices were screened and radiomics was used to extract a total of 102 features. A total of 16 approaches were used, combining 4 classifiers and 4 feature selection methods. The combination of Random Forest and Ridge performed with a sensitivity of 0.83, a specificity of 0.88, an accuracy of 0.85, and an AUC of 0.89±0.09. Differences between expert-selected MRI image slices and non-selected slices were analyzed by extracting the top five significant features. Selected quantitative features help expedite decision making and improve efficiency in studies to predict risk of rectal cancer surgery.

Abstract

Currently, studies to predict the risk of rectal cancer surgery select MRI image slices based on the clinical experience of surgeons. The purpose of this study is to semi-automatically select and classify 2D MRI image slides to predict the risk of rectal cancer surgery using biomarkers. The data used were retrospectively collected MRI imag- ing data of 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer at Gachon University Gil Medical Center. Expert-selected MRI image slices and non-selected slices were screened and radiomics was used to extract a total of 102 features. A total of 16 approaches were used, combining 4 classifiers and 4 feature selection methods. The combination of Random Forest and Ridge performed with a sensitivity of 0.83, a specificity of 0.88, an accuracy of 0.85, and an AUC of 0.89±0.09. Differences between expert-selected MRI image slices and non-selected slices were analyzed by extracting the top five significant features. Selected quantitative features help expedite decision making and improve efficiency in studies to predict risk of rectal cancer surgery.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Valentini V, "Evidence and research in rectal cancer", Radiotherapy and Oncology, 87(3), pp.449~474 (2008)
  2. Enker WE, "Total mesorectal excision–the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer", Annals of medicine, 29(2), pp.127~133 (1997)
  3. Shihab OC, "MRI staging of low rectal cancer", European radiology, 19(3), pp.643~650 (2009)
  4. Brown G, "Techniques and trouble-shooting in high spatial resolution thin slice MRI for rectal cancer", The British journal of radiology, 78(927), pp.245~251 (2005)
  5. Akiyoshi T, "Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer", Surgery, 146(3), pp.483~489 (2009)
  6. Chen J, "MRI pelvimetry-based evaluation of surgical difficulty in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for male rectal cancer", Surgery today, 51(7), pp.1144~1151 (2021)
  7. Escal L, "MRI-based score to predict surgical difficulty in patients with rectal cancer", Journal of British Surgery, 105(1), pp.140~146 (2018)
  8. Yamamoto T, "Prediction of surgical difficulty in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer by use of MRI pelvimetry", BJS Open, 4(4), pp.666~677 (2020)
  9. Lee JM, "Prediction of transabdominal total mesorectal excision difficulty according to the angle of pelvic floor muscle", Surgical Endoscopy, 34(7), pp.3043~3050 (2020)
  10. Trebeschi S, "Deep learning for fully-automated localization and segmentation of rectal cancer on multiparametric MR", Scientific reports, 7(1), pp.1~9 (2017)
  11. Doi K, "Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging", The British journal of radiology, 78(suppl_1), pp.s3~s19 (2005)
  12. Kumar V, "Radiomics : the process and the challenges", Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30(9), pp.1234~1248 (2012)
  13. Van Griethuysen JJM, "Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype", Cancer research, 77(21), pp.e104~e107 (2017)[DOI]
  14. Machicado JD, "Radiomics for the Diagnosis and Differentiation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions", Diagnostics, 10(7), pp.505~ (2020)
  15. Zhang S, "Role of MRI-based radiomics in locally advanced rectal cancer", Oncology Reports, 47(2), pp.1~10 (2022)
  16. Yip SSF, "Applications and limitations of radiomics", Physics in Medicine & Biology, 61(13), pp.R150~ (2016)
  17. Kniep HC, "Radiomics of brain MRI : utility in prediction of metastatic tumor type", Radiology, 290(2), pp.479~487 (2019)
  18. Kandemirli SG, "Presurgical detection of brain invasion status in meningiomas based on first-order histogram-based texture analysis of contrast enhanced imaging", Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 198, pp.106205~ (2020)
  19. Mohanaiah P, "Image tex ture feature extraction using GLCM approach", International journal of scientific and research publications, 3(5), pp.1~5 (2013)
  20. Ahmadi N, "Iris tissue recognition based on GLDM feature extraction and hybrid MLPNN-ICA classifier", Neural Computing and Applications, 32(7), pp.2267~2281 (2020)
  21. Sohail ASM, "Local relative GLRLM-based texture feature extraction for classifying ultrasound medical images", 2011 24th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), pp.001092~001095 (2011)
  22. Thibault G, "Advanced statistical matrices for texture characterization: Application to DNA chromatin and microtubule network classification", 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp.53~56 (2011)
  23. Amadasun M, "Textural features corresponding to textural properties", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19(5), pp.1264~1274 (1989)
  24. Chandrashekar G, "A survey on feature selection methods", Computers & Electrical Engineering, 40(1), pp.16~28 (2014)
  25. Lu M, "Embedded feature selection accounting for unknown data heterogeneity", Expert Systems with Applications, 119, pp.350~361 (2019)
  26. Yan K, "Feature selection and analysis on correlated gas sensor data with recursive feature elimination", Sensors and Actuators B : Chemical, 212, pp.353~363 (2015)
  27. Biau G, "A random forest guided tour", TEST, 25(2), pp.197~227 (2016)
  28. Verma C, "Real-time classification of national and international students for ICT and mobile technology : an experimental study on Indian and Hungarian University", Journal of Physics : Conference Series, 1432(1), pp.012091~ (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

2D 전립선 단면 영상에서 영역 분류를 위한 라디오믹스 기반 바이오마커 검증 연구김광기, 김영재, 김지섭, 박준영대한의용생체공학회 · 의공학회지2023 · 제44권 제1호Magnetic Resonance-Based Texture Analysis Differentiating KRAS Mutation Status in Rectal Cancer김번, 김대용, 김민주, 박성찬, 백지연, 손대경, 오재환, 오지은, 이주형, 장희진, 조선아, 허보윤대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제1호Prediction of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Using a Machine Learning Model Based on PET/CT Radiomics강정현, 김소영, 박은정, 백승혁, 유영훈, 이강영, 이재훈, 이혜선, 전태주연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2023 · 제64권 제5호컴퓨터 단층 촬영 영상에서의 전이성 척추 종양의 정량적 분류를 위한 라디오믹스 기반의 머신러닝 기법강혜원, 김광기, 김영재, 이은우, 임상헌, 전지수, 전지영대한의용생체공학회 · 의공학회지2021 · 제42권 제3호Texture Analysis in Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Recurrence Risk in Endometrial Cancer After Hysterectomy이주헌, 이현정대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2024 · 제28권 제2호Use of artificial intelligence in the management of T1 colorectal cancer: a new tool in the arsenal or is deep learning out of its depth?James Chi-Yong Ngu, James Weiquan Li, Katsuro Ichimasa, Kenneth Weicong Lin, Lai Mun Wang, Tiing Leong Ang대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2024 · 제57권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)