Analysis of Seongho Yi Ik’s Theory of Cognition
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The theory of cognition of Yi Ik was constructed in response to Kim Chang-hyeop, who separated cognition from morality by distinguishing between psychological energy and physical energy. Yi Ik reinterpreted Yi Hwang’s theory of mutual manifestation by making a distinction between psychological and physical energy, but developed a counterargument to Kim Chang-hyeop’s separation of cognition from morality. First, taking advantage of the Western medicine introduced by Adam Schall for connecting psychological and physical energy, Yi Ik insisted that the brain, which belonged to physical energy, could control the lower level cognitions like reflex action and sense perception. However, according to him, since mind, which was made of psychological energy, supervised all the processes of cognition by the principle of human nature, psychological energy and physical energy were interrelated. Second, in contrast with Kim Chang-hyeop, he reconnected cognition to wisdom as the source of moral consciousness and the intellectual virtue that could operate cognitive abilities. Although Yi Ik partially accepted the naturalism and psychologism of the Yulgok School, his theory can be considered a response of the Toegye School to Kim Chang-hyeop and a creative theory of cognition and morality integration.
Abstract
The theory of cognition of Yi Ik was constructed in response to Kim Chang-hyeop, who separated cognition from morality by distinguishing between psychological energy and physical energy. Yi Ik reinterpreted Yi Hwang’s theory of mutual manifestation by making a distinction between psychological and physical energy, but developed a counterargument to Kim Chang-hyeop’s separation of cognition from morality. First, taking advantage of the Western medicine introduced by Adam Schall for connecting psychological and physical energy, Yi Ik insisted that the brain, which belonged to physical energy, could control the lower level cognitions like reflex action and sense perception. However, according to him, since mind, which was made of psychological energy, supervised all the processes of cognition by the principle of human nature, psychological energy and physical energy were interrelated. Second, in contrast with Kim Chang-hyeop, he reconnected cognition to wisdom as the source of moral consciousness and the intellectual virtue that could operate cognitive abilities. Although Yi Ik partially accepted the naturalism and psychologism of the Yulgok School, his theory can be considered a response of the Toegye School to Kim Chang-hyeop and a creative theory of cognition and morality integration.
참고문헌 (21)
- An, Jeong-bok, "Selections from the Miscellaneous Discussions of Seongho Yi Ik" (1929)
- Hu, Guang, "Collection of Great Learning in Chapters and Verses"
- Kim, Chang-hyeop, "Complete Works of Nongam Kim Chang-hyeop"
- Yi, Ik, "Miscellaneous Discussions of Seongho Yi Ik"
- Kim, Chang-hyeop, "Complete Works of Seongho Yi Ik" (1922)
- Kim, Chang-hyeop, "Annotated Translation of New Book on the Four-Seven Debate" (1999), Daunsaem
- "Evidences Testifying Divine Providence"[URL]
- Zhu, Xi, "Questions and Answers Concerning the Great Learning", ~
- Zhu, Xi, "Collected Works of Zhu Xi" (1996), Sichuan Jiaoyu Chubanshe
- Ahn, Young-sang, "Seongho Yi Ik’s Theory on the Four-Seven Debate", Journal of Asian Philosophy in Korea, 11, pp.41~69 (1999)
- 안영상, "동서 문화의 융합-충돌 과정에 나타난 성호학파의 철학적 특징의 일단면", 민족문화연구, (41), pp.489~529 (2004), 민족문화연구원
- Kang, Byung-soo, "A Study on the Debate of Western Learning between Yi Ik and Shin Hudam", Korean Silhak Review, 6, pp.29~62 (2003)
- 김선희, "신체성, 일상성, 실천성, 공공성 : 성호 이익의 심학(心學)", 한국실학연구, (28), pp.77~123 (2014), 한국실학학회
- Kim, Woo-hyung, "Epistemology in Zhu Xi’s Philosophy: Formation and System of Cognitive Theory" (2005), Simsan
- 김우형, "주희 인심도심론의 윤리학적 성격에 대한 고찰 - 본체론 비판 및 ‘지각’론의 정립과 관련하여 -", 동서철학연구, (69), pp.158~187 (2013), 한국동서철학회[DOI]
- 김우형, "김창협의 지각론과 퇴율절충론의 관계에 대한 일고찰- 知覺과 智의 분리에 따른 도덕심리학적 견해", 한국철학논집, (40), pp.69~93 (2014), 한국철학사연구회
- Lyu, In-Heui, "Philosophical Thought of Miscellaneous Discussions of Seongho Yi Ik: Its Comparative Study with Cheng-Zhu’s Neo-Confucianism", Journal of the Jindan Historical Society, 59, pp.157~175 (1985)
- 문석윤, "星湖 李瀷의 心說에 관하여 : 畏庵 李栻의 ｢堂室銘｣에 대한 비판을 중심으로", 철학연구, (86), pp.5~31 (2009), 철학연구회
- Shin, Dongwon, "Korean Medical Discourses on Western Medicine, 1720–1876", Journal of Tasan Studies, 15, pp.181~218 (1876)
- Takahashi, Toru, "Korean Neo-Confucianism" (1999), Sonamu
- 여인석, "주제군징(主制群徵)』에 나타난 서양의학 이론과 중국과 조선에서의 수용 양상", 의사학, 21(2), pp.251~277 (2012), 대한의사학회