The Changbi Group’s East Asia Theory: Progressive Intellectual Discourses on Korean Unification and East Asian Peace
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Drawing attention to the geopolitical significance of the Korean Peninsula, many scholars have defined Korean unification as a critical condition for promoting East Asian community-building. During the 1990s, members of the Changbi Group, most notably Paik Nak-chung, Choi Won-shik, and Baik Young-Seo, proposed the idea that Korean unification plays such an important role, following Paik’s proposal of the Division System Theory. The East Asia Theory espoused by these scholars provides an opportunity to rethink contemporary Korean reality from the perspectives of both an individual state and the context of East Asia as a region. Despite the significance of these intellectual discussions, academia still awaits a detailed study of the analytic/ conceptual strengths and limitations of the East Asia Theory as a whole. Another point of contention that may be raised with previous research on the East Asia Theory is the lack of attention given to the theory’s practical implications. To fill this lacuna, this article offers a theoretical examination of the Changbi Group’s East Asia Theory, with a focus on its practical implications. Finally, this study looks into the limitations of the East Asia Theory and suggests a possible reformulation of it.
Abstract
Drawing attention to the geopolitical significance of the Korean Peninsula, many scholars have defined Korean unification as a critical condition for promoting East Asian community-building. During the 1990s, members of the Changbi Group, most notably Paik Nak-chung, Choi Won-shik, and Baik Young-Seo, proposed the idea that Korean unification plays such an important role, following Paik’s proposal of the Division System Theory. The East Asia Theory espoused by these scholars provides an opportunity to rethink contemporary Korean reality from the perspectives of both an individual state and the context of East Asia as a region. Despite the significance of these intellectual discussions, academia still awaits a detailed study of the analytic/ conceptual strengths and limitations of the East Asia Theory as a whole. Another point of contention that may be raised with previous research on the East Asia Theory is the lack of attention given to the theory’s practical implications. To fill this lacuna, this article offers a theoretical examination of the Changbi Group’s East Asia Theory, with a focus on its practical implications. Finally, this study looks into the limitations of the East Asia Theory and suggests a possible reformulation of it.
참고문헌 (31)
- Baik, Young-seo, "Dongasiain-ui “dongyang” insik: 19-20-segi", pp.11~26 (1997), Moonji Publishing
- Baik, Young-seo, "Dongasia-ui gwihwan" (2000), Changbi Publishers
- Baik, Young-seo, "Jubyeon-eseo bon dongasia", pp.13~37 (2004), Moonji Publishing
- Baik, Young-seo, "Dongasia-ui jiyeokjilseo: jeguk-eul neomeo gongdongchero" (2005), Changbi Publishers
- Baik, Young-seo, "Dongasiaron-gwa geundae jeogeung, geundae geukbok-ui ijung gwaje", Changjak-gwa bipyeong, 36(1), pp.31~51 (2008)
- Baik, Young-seo, "Editorial Introduction: Korea as a Problematic and Paik Nak-chung", Inter‐Asia Cultural Studies, 11(4), pp.481~487 (2010)
- Baik, Young-seo, "Yeondonghaneun dongasia, munje-roseoui hanbando", Changjak-gwa bipyeong, 39(1), pp.15~37 (2011)
- Baik, Young-seo, "Haeksim hyeonjang-eseo dongasia-reul dasi mutda: Gongsaeng sahoereul wihan silcheon gwaje" (2013), Changbi Publishers
- 천광싱, "세계화와 탈제국, ‘방법으로서의 아시아’", 아세아연구, 52(1), pp.57~80 (2009), 아세아문제연구원
- Chen, Kuanhsing, "Paik Nak‐chung’s Theory of Overcoming ‘Division System’:Rethinking the China-Taiwan Relation with Reference to the Two Koreas", InterAsia Cultural Studies, 11(4), pp.566~590 (2010)
- Choi, Won-shik, "Tallaengjeon sidae-wa dongasiajeok sigak-ui mosaek", Changjakgwa bipyeong, 21(1), pp.204~225 (1993)
- Choi, Won-shik, "Jubyeon-eseo bon dongasia", pp.313~333 (2004), Moonji Publishing
- 임우경, "비판적 지역주의로서 한국 동아시아론의 전개", 중국현대문학, (40), pp.1~51 (2007), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 정종현, "'동아시아' 담론의 문제와 가능성-30년대 '동양' 담론과의 비교를 중심으로-", 상허학보, 9, pp.39~69 (2002), 상허학회
- Kim, Gwang-ok, "Dongasia yeongu", pp.162~176 (1999), Sallim
- 김종욱, "‘한반도 평화공영체제’ 구상과 ‘동아시아 공동체’ 건설 - 아시아·태평양 평화공영을 촉진하는 ‘네트워크 국가(Network State)’ -", 통일정책연구, 20(1), pp.185~212 (2011), 통일연구원
- Kim, Myeong-seop, "Dongasia-ui jiyeok jilseo: jeguk-eul neomeo gongdongchero", pp.264~308 (2005), Changbi Publishers
- Koyasu, Nobukuni, "Donga, daedonga, dongasia: Geundae ilbon-ui orientallijeum" (2005), Yeoksa bipyeongsa
- Lee, Dong-yeun, "Dongasia damnonhyeongseong-ui gallaedeul: bipanjeok geomto", Munhwa gwahak, 52, pp.98~118 (2007)
- Lee, Jeong-hoon, "Dongasia damnon, on gil-gwa gal gil", Changjak-gwa bipyeong, 42(1), pp.395~407 (2014)
- Lee, Jong-seok, "Dongasia-wa bundan hanguk: hyeonjang gyeongheom-gwa myeotgaji dansang", Changjak-gwa bipyeong, 39(2), pp.338~360 (2011)
- Paik, Nak-chung, "Hanbandosik tongil, hyeonjae jinhaenghyeong", pp.99~128 (2006), Changbi Publishers
- Paik, Nak-chung, "Ijung gwajeron", pp.29~50 (2009), Changbi Publishers
- 백낙청, "'동아시아공동체' 구상과 한반도: 일본의 한국병탄 100주년을 맞아", 역사비평, (92), pp.229~249 (2010), 역사문제연구소
- 박민철, "한국 동아시아담론의 현재와 미래: ‘동아시아공동체론’을 중심으로", 통일인문학, 63, pp.131~165 (2015), 인문학연구원
- Park, Myoung-kyu, "Bokapjeok jeongchi gongdongch-wa byeonhyeok-ui nolli", Changjak-gwa bipyeong, 28(1), pp.8~26 (2000)
- Person, James, "Limits of the ‘Lips and Teeth’ Alliance: New Evidence on SinoDPRK Relations, 1955–1984", Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars., ~ (1955)
- 류준필, "분단체제론과 동아시아론", 아세아연구, 52(4), pp.38~72 (2009), 아세아문제연구원
- Shen, Zhihua, "A Misunderstood Friendship: Mao Zedong, Kim Il-sung, and Sino-North Korean Relations, 1949–1976" (2018), Columbia University Press
- Sun, Ge, "Minjung sigak-gwa minjung yeondae", Changjak-gwa bipyeong, 39(1), pp.74~94 (2011)
- Wada, Haruki, "Dongbuk asia gongdong-ui jip" (2004), Ilchogak Publishing