“Two States-Two Systems” on the Korean Peninsula with Security Guarantees from the U.S. and China
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this article is to critically examine the existing discourse on the reunification of the Korean peninsula and the Chinese “one country-two systems” construct and to provide a method of approach to realistically feasible strategies for peace and prosperity. Most of the Korean discourse on the establishment of a peace system on the Korean peninsula and the reunification of Korea and the case of “one country-two systems” in China favor a gradual, phased approach based on functionalism theory. However, these studies do not recognize the political reality of separate states with independent sovereignty and substantially different 30systems. As a result, conflicts and confrontations continue despite non-political exchange and cooperation between the two Koreas. In order to solve or minimize these problems, I suggest a “two sovereign states-two systems” approach for peace and prosperity on the Korean peninsula and Northeast Asia, with their security guaranteed by the four major powers around the two Koreas.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to critically examine the existing discourse on the reunification of the Korean peninsula and the Chinese “one country-two systems” construct and to provide a method of approach to realistically feasible strategies for peace and prosperity. Most of the Korean discourse on the establishment of a peace system on the Korean peninsula and the reunification of Korea and the case of “one country-two systems” in China favor a gradual, phased approach based on functionalism theory. However, these studies do not recognize the political reality of separate states with independent sovereignty and substantially different 30systems. As a result, conflicts and confrontations continue despite non-political exchange and cooperation between the two Koreas. In order to solve or minimize these problems, I suggest a “two sovereign states-two systems” approach for peace and prosperity on the Korean peninsula and Northeast Asia, with their security guaranteed by the four major powers around the two Koreas.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김연철, "김대중·노무현 정부 10년의 남북관계 : 평가와 과제", 기억과 전망, (22), pp.109~140 (2010), 민주화운동기념사업회
- 김옥준, "양안관계발전과 통일방안에 대한 기능주의적 고찰", 국제정치연구, 14(1), pp.223~251 (2011), 동아시아국제정치학회
- 매일경제, "대만' 딸기세대'의 힘", 매일경제 1 월 18 일, ~ (2016)
- 박인규, "백낙청-최장집 한반도 평화체제 논쟁 한반도 평화와 통일은 양립 가능한가?", 프레시안. 4 월 7 일, ~ (2018)
- 백학순., "김대중정부와 노무현정부의 대북정책 비교", 세종정책연구, 5(1), pp.277~354
- 윤경우, "양안관계를 통해 본 남북한관계 발전의 신(新)전략", 인문사회과학연구, (47), pp.99~135 (2015), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
- "중국현대를 읽는 키워드 100 '일국양제'" (2016)[URL]
- 윤평중, "우리의 소원은 평화", 조선일보. 6 월 8 일, ~ (2018)
- 동서독 통일과정에서 서독정부의 대동독정책 연구, "이상신", 통일연구원, ~, pp.KIEP 정책연구시리즈 17-03
- 이일영, "'양국체제' 는 실현가능한가", 경향신문. 12 월 14 일, ~ (2017)
- 2018 통일의식조사, "정동준", 서울대학교 통일평화연구원, ~ (2019)
- 정창화, "유럽통합모델과 남북한 통합모델간의 비교분석", 행정논총, 40(4), pp.6~157 (2002), 한국행정연구소
- 통일방안에 대한 이해, "통일부", ~ (2002)
- Anderson, Benedict, "Imagined Community: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism" (1983), Verso
- The White House, "National Security Strategy of the United States of America", ~ (2017)
- 政治大學選舉研究中心, "臺灣民眾臺灣人 中國人認同趨勢分佈 (1992年 06月-2018年 12月)", ~ (2019)
- 政治大學選舉研究中心, "臺灣民 眾統獨 趨勢分佈 (1992年 06月-2018 年 12月)", ~ (1992)
- 蘋果日報, "周子瑜道 歉黃安爽喊 : 爭取回認同祖國的好孩子", 蘋果日報 1月 15日, ~ (2016)
- 大陸委員會, "民眾對兩岸相關議題之看法 民意調査結果", ~ (2019)
- 中央社, "周子瑜事件 民調稱約影響 1 成選票", ~ (2016)
- 自由時報, "全民怒了 子瑜事件升高到國家層次", 自由時報. 1月 16日, ~ (2016)
- 行政院內政部戶政司, "民國 108年 2月戶口統計資料分析", ~ (2019)
- ETtoday 東森新聞雲, "周子瑜事件發酵邱毅坦言 確實重創國民黨選情!", ETtoday 東森新聞雲. 1月 16日, ~ (2016)